RealNapster
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 6, 2015
- Messages
- 7,611
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
I am pretty certain a few hundred years down the line the future generations would look at our times and say - "wow - what a bunch of idiots."
True that.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am pretty certain a few hundred years down the line the future generations would look at our times and say - "wow - what a bunch of idiots."

YAWNThat is great. Who soever think that they will do mischief and will get away will have to pay the price and heavy price.
Now Indian army has lot more to their discretion to use against cross border strike including Guided Pinaka with 75 KM range which can wipe whole area out in one stroke and precision artillery shelling in chopper based operations.
this is getting boring, too much phantom is not good for your brain.YAWNthis is getting boring, too much phantom is not good for your brain.
Ok your wish shall be granted happy now, sleep well.Be carefull next time. Now Surgical strike is a standard procedure.

bollywood surgical strikes that even the international media laughed atBe carefull next time. Now Surgical strike is a standard procedure.
The point is you don't have a source to back your 100 meter claim. The way you describe it - it sounds pretty much like what China did in 1962 to India.The point is that India did cross the border, shoot their guns, went right back and call it surgical strike. It's more of a cross border shooting.
Because India come up with exaggerated names such as surgical strike to describe a shallow cross border incursion, there is no need to discuss forther as we all agree with the facts, if not the name.
So what is the difference between a border incursion vs surgical strike in India? Outside of India, What India did was an incursion. What US did with OBL was a surgical strike.
The point is you don't have a source to back your 100 meter claim. The way you describe it - it sounds pretty much like what China did in 1962 to India.
To execute a operation 3 kms behind the enemy line is not just a border incursion. We Indians have reasons to believe the DGMO of Indian Army cause they had never lied to us. Pakistanis can believe what their army says. The truth will out in a few years like it did for Kargil.So what is the difference between a border incursion vs surgical strike in India? Outside of India, What India did was an incursion. What US did with OBL was a surgical strike.
Be carefull next time. Now Surgical strike is a standard procedure.
Once again - perhaps someone should translate this for you in a language comprehensible to you. "Do you have any source for your 100 meter claim?"LOL. Didn't China feed the India prisoners and India opened the prisons in Assam in anticipation of an invasion. What I described is more of a cross border shooting. Which India called a surgical strike.
India need to accept that this surgical strike is actually a border incursion.
To execute a operation 3 kms behind the enemy line is not just a border incursion. We Indians have reasons to believe the DGMO of Indian Army cause they have never lied to us. Pakistanis can believe what their army says. The truth will out in a few years later like it did on Kargil.
Once again - perhaps someone should translate this for you in a language comprehensible to you. "Do you have any source for your 100 meter claim?"
You do know that Pakistani Rangers cannot guard every inch of LOC 24×7. No border security forces in the world can do that. How Indian SFs conducted the strikes......well we will need a whole new thread to discuss that but the cross border Surgical Strikes were not targeted against the Pakistani army rather it was against the terror camps operating deep inside Pak administered Kashmir those and who were actively deployed to ensure their safety(PA) were a collateral damage. The message was very clear if Pakistani army cannot exterminate the JUD, LET terror factory then we will do it for them.Is it 3 km and did India bypass border guards to strike deep into Pakistani territory. Maybe the Pakistani border post situated 3 km from the border at that point. That would not be surgical strike.
The only surgical strike is the Indian propaganda.
New Recruit
You do know that Pakistani Rangers cannot guard every inch of LOC 24×7. No border security forces in the world can do that. How Indian SFs conducted the strikes......well we will need a whole new thread to discuss that but the cross border Surgical Strikes were not targeted against the Pakistani army rather it was against the terror camps operating deep inside Pak administered Kashmir those and who were actively deployed to ensure their safety(PA) were a collateral damage. The message was very clear if Pakistani army cannot exterminate the JUD, LET terror factory then we will do it for them.
Pakistan played a master stroke by flying the international press to these 5 locations india claimed to have to carried our surgical strikes, these journalists didn't find a single piece of shelling.