Su-57. World's first fighter plane equipped with 4 faced AESA giving 360 degrees radar coverage

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

 

[Ultima Thule]

all jet's radars can give 360 degree coverge but those small radar on Su-57 are for stealth jet detection and ECM purpose only @undertakerwwefan

 

[GumNaam]

it's a dead program. stop wasting bandwidth!

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

it's a dead program. stop wasting bandwidth!

Source?

all jet's radars can give 360 degree coverge

How so?

 

[Ultima Thule]

Source?



How so?

Do you know that what is the 360 degree means @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Do you know that what is the 360 degree means @undertakerwwefan

1 in the front. 1 on the left. 1 on the right. 1 at the back. That's 360 degrees coverage. KJ-2000 has 360 degrees coverage with 3 AESAs.

 

[Ultima Thule]

1 in the front. 1 on the left. 1 on the right. 1 at the back. That's 360 degrees coverage. KJ-2000 has 360 degrees coverage with 3 AESAs.

So all AESA would do that especially swashplate AESA (Mechanical turning AESA) and as for your information common (unmovable/fixed AESA) could steer its beams electronically to 15 degree @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

So all AESA would do that especially swashplate AESA (Mechanical turning AESA) and as for your information common (unmovable/fixed AESA) could steer its beams electronically to 15 degree @undertakerwwefan

Su-57 has 360 degrees coverage without mechanical scan.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Su-57 has 360 degrees coverage without mechanical scan.

So does F-22/F-35/J-20 etc etc @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

So does F-22/F-35/J-20 etc etc @undertakerwwefan

You need at least 3 faced AESA for 360 degrees coverage. KJ-2000 has 3 AESAs in a circular dome. Fighter jets need 4 faced AESA to have 360 degrees coverage. 1 facing the front. 1 facing the back. 1 facing the left. 1 facing the right. F-22 has only 1 faced AESA. Not enough for 360 degrees coverage.

 

[Ultima Thule]

You need at least 3 faced AESA for 360 degrees coverage. KJ-2000 has 3 AESAs in a circular dome. Fighter jets need 4 faced AESA to have 360 degrees coverage. 1 facing the front. 1 facing the back. 1 facing the left. 1 facing the right. F-22 has only 1 faced AESA. Not enough for 360 degrees coverage.

360 coverge on F-22/J-20/F-35 is achievable in lots different ways RWR (Radar warning receiver)on all 4th/4.5th/5th gen jets are also kind of radars /AESA to cover rear area of jet, ETOS on F-35 can have this capability, as i says on my earlier post swashplate (mechanical turning) AESA will have this capability to detect side ways and fixed AESA has also to steer radio waves to 15 degree so they also have the capability to detect sideways, so this not true that Su-57 is first jet to cover whole 360 degree angles @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

360 coverge on F-22/J-20/F-35 is achievable in lots different ways RWR (Radar warning receiver)on all 4th/4.5th/5th gen jets are also kind of radars /AESA to cover rear area of jet, ETOS on F-35 can have this capability,

Capability of RWR and ETOS / IRST are nowhere close to AESA. They are passive and limited by weather conditions. AESA is active and much more robust.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Capability of RWR and ETOS / IRST are nowhere close to AESA. They are passive and limited by weather conditions. AESA is active and much more robust.

Both are same research yourself before you bark here pro Russian baseless ranting fan @undertakerwwefan

Capability of RWR and ETOS / IRST are nowhere close to AESA. They are passive and limited by weather conditions. AESA is active and much more robust.

IR is more penetrable to clouds/fog/hail/snow than radio waves @undertakerwwefan

Capability of RWR and ETOS / IRST are nowhere close to AESA. They are passive and limited by weather conditions. AESA is active and much more robust.

And what pathetic thinking of yours SU-35 doesn't using PESA which is passive and doesn't have all weather IRST on it @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

And what pathetic thinking of yours SU-35 doesn't using PESA which is passive and doesn't have all weather IRST on it

All radars are active. They send out radio waves to bounce back. IRST and RWR are passive. They do not send out anything. They only receive.

IR is more penetrable to clouds/fog/hail/snow than radio waves

Nop. IR is susceptible to clouds.

Both are same research yourself before you bark here pro Russian baseless ranting fan

I ain't a Russian fan. I'm Chinese.

 

[GumNaam]

Source?

now stop waisting bandwidth por favor!