What's new

Su-57. World's first fighter plane equipped with 4 faced AESA giving 360 degrees radar coverage

Nop. IR is susceptible to clouds.
oh pathic thinker read IR properties than bark , IR penetrable all atmospheric conditions, except water/ Oceans and earth/land @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah: you're the most stupid person here on PDF @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::crazy::hitwall:

All radars are active. They send out radio waves to bounce back. IRST and RWR are passive. They do not send out anything. They only receive.
They more accurate only receiving hostile radio waves signals @undertakerwwefan
 
.
. .
360 coverge on F-22/J-20/F-35 is achievable in lots different ways RWR (Radar warning receiver)on all 4th/4.5th/5th gen jets are also kind of radars /AESA to cover rear area of jet, ETOS on F-35 can have this capability, as i says on my earlier post swashplate (mechanical turning) AESA will have this capability to detect side ways and fixed AESA has also to steer radio waves to 15 degree so they also have the capability to detect sideways, so this not true that Su-57 is first jet to cover whole 360 degree angles @undertakerwwefan

Actually no jets can have exact 360 Radar coverage right? I mean the Radars can move for degree to the right and the left. Some place TR modules on the side. But on the rear? This guy suggest an radar on the engine rear. The heat itself will make the radar useless. And I have never seen more than one radar in a flight.
 
.
How would they know that?
https://thediplomat.com/2018/08/rus...-contract-for-12-su-57-stealth-fighters-soon/

Alex Lockie is a pro American aviationist who will not hesitate to say F-86 Sabre can beat Su-35 in a 1 min one on min dog fight in year 2018...

His words about enemies of USA is as good as trash.

Screen Shot 2018-11-09 at 6.51.42 PM.png


I dunno man, hard to dispute so many news sources. but if its not dead then good for them.
 
. .
Actually no jets can have exact 360 Radar coverage right? I mean the Radars can move for degree to the right and the left. Some place TR modules on the side. But on the rear? This guy suggest an radar on the engine rear. The heat itself will make the radar useless. And I have never seen more than one radar in a flight.
Fixed AESA has capability to move their beams (radio waves) 15 degree electronically without moving the antenna, and as for rear coverage Su- series of jet (Su-27 to Su-57) has tail stinger which contain air intercept radar, in between the engines @Arulmozhi Varman

@undertakerwwefan and @Beast ignore this troll the so called "@pakistanipower". Don't give him any attention and he'll eventually take a hint and disappear. :crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy:
You're troll not me you twit @GumNaam :blah::blah::blah:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom