What's new

Splitting India

.
Ah another thread about partition, they are kind of getting boring, what if this what if that.

Though out known history land that is present day Pakistan was joined with India maybe 2 or 3 times, apart from that its always been separate, but this is quickly forgotten and deliberately ignored by some who feel that subcontinent was united since the beginging of time.

Something that is unnatural normally falls pretty quick and the union under the British was unnatural hence it fell very quickly as their reign ended.

So many ifs, so many dreamers, what if the central Asian didn't invade, what if the persians didnt invade, what if the afghan didnt invade, what if the British didnt invade, what if this what if that.

Reality is different but only few have the courage to face and accept it.
 
.
well not only in india.but even in the west.they are all into Islam these days



youtube might not be our friend at the moment but your is.please youtube about zakir naik..may be you will even find hindu pandits accepting islam live

Haha,

Those guys ll take money,convert on Tv and go have a full whiskey.
 
. .
Splliting of India could have been avoided by reinstating the Mughals in Delhi. The process or the movement for this should have been started long before 1947. But, no Muslim or Hindu leaders thought of a Muslim Mughal suzerainty, even a weak one, that could have avoided a splitting of India in the religious line.

Pakistan movement was always anticipated,so it was simple a matter of time.

Like Russia has proven today,Russia by being Russia and not as USSR can control CIS better,similarly India has everything to gain by having Pak as the buffer with central Asia and also Bangladesh in our pocket.
 
. .
Dont cherry pick figures especially PPP based per capita. After Indian rupee collapse Pakistan per capita is again higher like it was before 2008 and also GDP growth rate. Basically Pakistan started with 0 unlike India thanks to British Raj not willing to set up any industry in muslim majority areas. They always favored hindu baniyas over muslims. Even despite military coups, wars and in last decade terrorism the poverty is still less in Pakistan then India.

What is partition didn't take place? Then one just have to look at Indian muslim conditions, even worse then dalits. Its funny now Hindus say British created Pakistan because they didnt want India to become super power. But one thing is for sure as long as Pakistan exist India power will only extend to bullying Nepal.

The best agricultural land was given to Pakistan in Punjab and East bengal,Lahore & Karachi were two of the best cities of the country.

India had 4 big cities and Pakistan had 2 big ones,fair game.

How ll u get equity,u ll never get it because Non Muslims were 2/3rds of the population and they ll get everything in proportion.

you dont want to talk about how India had less railroad than Pakistan before 1947.

Pakistan cant and wont do anything to dent Indian power,they used to be a Cento slave back in the days and did their job usefully but all that cold war scenario is the past.

lol

Regional power as far as Nepal is concerned. After 9/11 Pakistan decade old military embargo and economic sanctions were lifted. Now Pakistan military will only get better with time. India being regional power was only possible if Pakistan was stuck in 80's while India moved ahead in military.



I was talking about industries which were only setup in hindu majority areas, British only favored Hindus. FATA being 22% literate is nothing to do with poverty i was talking about compared to majority India.

With collapse of Indian rupee nominal per capita decreased in $.

The evil hindu baniya in reality is a great risk taking businessmen,there are very few succesful business communities amongst Muslims apart from the dawoodi bohras and a few others.

Thats why business was set up in Hindu areas/Indian areas.

Karachi was and is even today and place full of businessmen,the memons,the bohras etc etc.

India need more partitioning. It should be how it was before British took over. Only after that could India become an independent state. Now, its still a legacy of British colonialism.

Hyderabad should be reverted to a Muslim state. Mysore should also be one as well.

good luck.
 
.
India need more partitioning. It should be how it was before British took over. Only after that could India become an independent state. Now, its still a legacy of British colonialism.

Hyderabad should be reverted to a Muslim state. Mysore should also be one as well.

Your brain needs formatting and partitoning,too much malware.
 
. . . . .
Do you realize why Lakshawdeep being a muslim majority area does have very low crime rate, don't get bombed (cause of proximity with Pakistan) and very peacefully lazy. It is because they Identify themselves as Indian and for every Indian religion comes next and majority believes in it. There are a few rotten eggs everywhere.

India need more partitioning. It should be how it was before British took over. Only after that could India become an independent state. Now, its still a legacy of British colonialism.

Hyderabad should be reverted to a Muslim state. Mysore should also be one as well.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom