What's new

Splitting India

Settle the Hyderabad issue first,we can come to Kashmir later.

You showed double standards and contradicted yourself, well majority Muslim didn't want to be part of pro Indian Kashmiri ruler. not much different from what you said about Hindu majority of Hyderabad.
 
So does this same rule apply to Kashmir, people being a majority Muslim not wanting to be ruled by Hindu India?.

No way. Indians make rules depends on what suit them.

You showed double standards and contradicted yourself, well majority Muslim didn't want to be part of pro Indian Kashmiri ruler. not much different from what you said about Hindu majority of Hyderabad.

I can't wait for the responses to your post.
 
Any source to support your claim.

Hindus getting converted into Islam in thousands each day
followed by higher birth rate.while Hindus growth rate is all set to stall and rather go into decreasing

I see this happening before 2050


Utter bullshit
 
It was indeed an invasion and the Nizam of Hyderabad didn't wanted to join the Indian union. So Indian army forced its way in and conquered a foreign entity. Its time to count the crime of India's imperialism and this fact should never be forgotten.

How did you remove last Emperor Puyi, was he even consulted for abdication. :wacko::wacko:
 
You showed double standards and contradicted yourself, well majority Muslim didn't want to be part of pro Indian Kashmiri ruler. not much different from what you said about Hindu majority of Hyderabad.

I knew you will dig this topic to defend your stance on Hyderabad :D First accept India's claim on Hyderabad is legitimate then we will discuss Kashmir,ok?
 
Like any trend the Muslim birth rate will fall also it already is showing signs of that, and some Muslims are converting to Hinduism also.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even ex Kashmiri militants are turning to Hinduism to escape the cycle of bloodshed
 
I knew you will dig this topic to defend your stance on Hyderabad :D First accept India's claim on Hyderabad is legitimate then we will discuss Kashmir,ok?

No one bring up the Hyderabad issue is because of Indian invasion right after independent. But this issue should be kept alive and the Nizam of Hyderabad restored to his position.
 
You showed double standards and contradicted yourself, well majority Muslim didn't want to be part of pro Indian Kashmiri ruler. not much different from what you said about Hindu majority of Hyderabad.

When did Pakistan cared about Hindu or Muslim majority during accession. Your leader started that double standard by interfering in Junagadh(14Sep 1947) before Kashmir(22 october). Even after losing Kashmir, Pakistan refused to compromise with Hyderabad. After losing all three of them, you guys are talking about double standard. Perhaps you are forgetting Kalat was too annexed by Pakistan.

Dont' confuse revolution with invasion. Did the British liberated India?

You are talking about legality of Monarch. :wacko:
 
No one bring up the Hyderabad issue is because of Indian invasion right after independent. But this issue should be kept alive and the Nizam of Hyderabad restored to his position.

As a strong nation this is our apt right to secure our boundaries. India's claim on Hyderabad or Kashmir is as much legitimate as in case of Chinese claim on Tibet or the Northern block of Bhutan. You can not blame the Indians for the crime which you Chinese are accused of for the last 60 years.
 
Fair enough, one mans freedom is another mans slavery, the slaves being the Hyderabadi Muslims.

They had choice, some settled in Karachi in Bahadurabad, rest stayed here, it was all choice.
 
Back
Top Bottom