What's new

Nazification of India: A Vindication of Two-nation Theory

Signalian

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
10,608
Reaction score
305
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
This article examines the rising influence of Hindutva ideology, its striking similarities to Nazification, and its implications based on the report titled Nazification of India by a U.S.-based human rights group “Justice for All”.


964d180ea80d672a811ed3b56da0b05e.jpg



The boundaries of Pakistan and India surfaced on the map of the world in 1947. This was accomplished on the basis of the Two-nation Theory. This theory held that there were two nations, Hindus and Muslims living in the sub-continent. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan was the first advocate of the Two-nation Theory in the modern era. He believed that India was a continent and not a country, and that among the vast population of different races and different creeds, Hindus and Muslims were the two major nations on the basis of nationality, religion, way of life, customs, traditions, culture and historical conditions.
The politicization of the Muslim community developed as an effect of three developments. i.e., (i) Various efforts towards Islamic reform and revival during the late 19th and early 20th centuries; (ii) The impact of Hindu-based nationalism; and (iii) The democratization of the government of British India.


In a report titled "Nazification of India" by Justice for All, it is asserted that the BJP-RSS is promoting the ideology of Hindu supremacy known as "Hindutva." Drawing inspiration from Nazi ideologies, Hindutva is believed to be leading to the Nazification of India. Indian Christians and Dalits are also victims of this trend, but the primary focus of this report is on Indian Muslims, who appear to be the main target.


The main reason behind the demand for Pakistan was the maintenance of a separate identity of the Muslim nationhood. Incidents like the Urdu-Hindi controversy (1867), the partition of Bengal (1905), and Hindu revivalism, set the two nations, the Hindus and the Muslims, further apart. The idea of a separate homeland for the Muslims of Northern India as proposed by Allama Iqbal in his famous Allahabad Address showed that the creation of two separate states for the Muslims and Hindus was the only solution. The idea was reiterated during the Sindh provincial meeting of the League, and finally adopted as the official League position in the Lahore Declaration of March 23, 1940. Thus these historical, cultural, religious and social differences between the two nations accelerated the pace of political developments, finally leading to the division of British India.


73a1c863a54653d5e184b790fee14754.jpg



A British lawyer named Cyril Radcliffe, who had never set foot in Asia, was called upon to draw up the borders between the two countries. Arriving in India just days before the partition, Radcliffe drew up a quick plan that was kept secret for the fear that the British would be blamed for the violence that would surely ensue. The weeks and months leading up to and following the partition saw unprecedented levels of rioting, violence, loss of property, rape, abduction and murder. The violence was worse in the two halves of Punjab, as Hindus headed in one direction and Muslims in another, with Sikhs and other minorities caught in the middle.

Some of the worst atrocities took place in the Punjab. Despite the efforts of the 55,000-strong Punjab Boundary Force, over 200,000 people were murdered. Ten million became refugees in what was the largest population movement in history. Muslims travelled to Pakistan; Sikhs and Hindus to India. Up to a million of these refugees were killed in a series of horrific massacres in the border regions. India and Pakistan’s independence at midnight on August 14-15, 1947 was a key moment in the history of the British Empire. India had been its cornerstone and many colonies had been secured in order to protect the trade routes to it. What's more, the British withdrawal was clearly seen as a precedent by other parts of the Empire. This hastened their own calls for independence. Almost immediately after independence, tensions between India and Pakistan began to boil over.

Coming back to the present, as Modi's influence grows within India, the country's global standing appears to be diminishing. The rise of Hindutva, a Hindu-centric political and cultural ideology, has gained prominence in India's political landscape. The increasing influence of Hindutva-aligned parties, especially the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has raised concerns about the potential erosion of democratic values and the concentration of power in the hands of a single ideology. This consolidation of power resembles the authoritarian tendencies observed during the Nazi regime in Germany.


The glorification of Hitler goes beyond mere symbolism; it has become a profitable venture. The Indian edition of Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, has become a best-seller since its publication. Additionally, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz notes that Mein Kampf has even entered the mainstream as a "must-read" management strategy book for business school students in India. This notorious polemic continues to generate significant revenue for publishers, perpetuating the problematic trend of glorifying Hitler's ideology in the country.



In 2021, India was downgraded to "partially free" by Freedom House. The Economist Intelligence Unit's Democracy Index categorized the world's largest democracy as a "Flawed Democracy." Additionally, India's media freedom ranking declined significantly, as per the 2022 Reporters Without Borders, placing it at 150th out of 180 countries.

In a report titled "Nazification of India" by Justice for All, it is asserted that the BJP-RSS is promoting the ideology of Hindu supremacy known as "Hindutva." Drawing inspiration from Nazi ideologies, Hindutva is believed to be leading to the Nazification of India. Indian Christians and Dalits are also victims of this trend, but the primary focus of this report is on Indian Muslims, who appear to be the main target.

As Modi's political fortunes rise, India's international reputation faces challenges, with assessments from various global indices and organizations indicating declining trends in media freedom and democratic practices. The report by Justice for All highlights the concerning influence of Hindutva ideology and its potential impact on the country's social and religious dynamics, particularly for Indian Muslims.
In today's India, Adolf Hitler, a universally recognized symbol of unfettered hatred, is being glorified, and his hateful ideology is shamelessly promoted. Surprisingly, there are businesses named after Hitler in the country. Moreover, school textbooks praise Hitler for his achievements while conveniently ignoring his genocidal actions against Jews and other minorities.


Besides that, schools throughout India disseminate distorted information about Hitler's "achievements." In 2004, when Narendra Modi served as Chief Minister of Gujarat, school textbooks published by the Gujarat State Board portrayed Hitler as a hero and glorified fascism. The tenth-grade social studies textbook featured chapters titled "Hitler, the Supremo" and "Internal Achievements of Nazism."


Tragically, instances of pogroms targeting Muslims lead to the loss of their homes, forcing them to seek refuge in safer neighborhoods where other marginalized Muslim communities reside. This ongoing process has resulted in the slow establishment of Muslim enclaves within cities. As the BJP-RSS regime pursues its path towards the Hinduization of India, these Muslim enclaves become vulnerable spaces, surrounded and dependent on the majority Hindu population, making them easier targets for discrimination and hostility.



The glorification of Hitler goes beyond mere symbolism; it has become a profitable venture. The Indian edition of Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, has become a best-seller since its publication. Additionally, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz notes that Mein Kampf has even entered the mainstream as a "must-read" management strategy book for business school students in India. This notorious polemic continues to
generate significant revenue for publishers, perpetuating the problematic trend of glorifying Hitler's ideology in the country.
According to The Times of India, various products like coffee mugs, posters featuring Swastika and Hitler, laptop casings resembling the Stahlhelm worn by Hitler's troops, T-shirts, cardigans, coasters, spikebusters, extension cords, locks, iPhone covers, jewelry boxes, and lamp stands are being sold on popular e-commerce platforms such as Amazon and Flipkart, all with the association of Hitler's name.
This phenomenon reflects how Indian consumer culture and educational programming is contributing to the glorification of Hitler. By normalizing his image and promoting products linked to him, the country's citizens would be influenced to view Hitler and his ideologies more favorably.
India's segregation into ghettos follows a pattern that aligns with the majoritarianism of the BJP-RSS regime. Muslims often face obstacles in obtaining rental properties in upscale city areas. Disturbingly, some rental ads explicitly discourage Muslim applicants. The discriminatory practices extend to property sales, where Muslims are denied access based on various pretexts, and some developers outright refuse to sell to them. In Gujarat, there are even laws reinforcing this bias.



Tragically, instances of pogroms targeting Muslims lead to the loss of their homes, forcing them to seek refuge in safer neighborhoods where other marginalized Muslim communities reside. This ongoing process has resulted in the slow establishment of Muslim enclaves within cities. As the BJP-RSS regime pursues its path towards the Hinduization of India, these Muslim enclaves become vulnerable spaces, surrounded and dependent on the majority Hindu population, making them easier targets for discrimination and hostility.


One concerning example is an excerpt from the grade 6 textbook that targets non-vegetarians, often seen as a stand-in for Muslims. The passage unfairly stereotypes this group, making sweeping negative generalizations. The passage portrays non-vegetarians as people who are dishonest, untruthful, violent, and prone to committing sex crimes, perpetuating harmful biases and prejudices.


The term "rakshasa" holds deep significance in Hindu religious literature, symbolizing evil and man-eating cannibals. Hindutva ideologues, like the popular Hindu monk Narsinghanand, define Muslims as "rakshasas" to religiously legitimize violence against them, painting Muslims as legitimate enemies worthy of extermination. This dehumanizing classification also justifies sexual violence against Muslim women, as the Hindu book of laws, Manusmriti, subjects "rakshasas" to kidnapping, bride capture, and other forms of sexual violence.




Both the Nazis' destruction of synagogues in Germany and the targeting of Muslim mosques in India by the RSS bear similarities in their intent to erase the presence of religious minorities. Before Kristallnacht, the Nazis ordered the demolition of synagogues in various German cities, while anti-Jewish vandalism became widespread in other areas. Similarly, in India, the RSS has been involved in demolishing mosques as part of their ideological agenda, seeking to marginalize and erase the presence of the Muslim community. Both actions represent attempts to eliminate physical reminders of religious diversity and assert dominance of a particular ideology.




On December 6th, 1992, a significant group affiliated with the RSS, known as Vishva Hindu Parishad, and led by prominent BJP leaders, demolished the 16th-century Babri mosque. Their actions were based on an unproven claim that the mosque stood on the birthplace of the mythological Hindu God Rama. Subsequently, widespread attacks on Muslims erupted throughout India, leading to the tragic death of at least 2,000 people, with the majority being Muslims.

Shockingly, nearly three decades after the incident, a special court acquitted all 32 individuals accused of the illegal demolition of the historic mosque. Furthermore, despite the court's ruling that the destruction was illegal, the land was allocated to the very people who were responsible for the mosque's destruction, on the basis of their strong belief in its connection to Rama's birthplace.

This development highlights concerns about a compromised judiciary under the BJP-RSS regime, where Hindutva ideology appears to take precedence over principles of justice and international norms. The incident serves as another manifestation of the challenges posed by extremist ideologies influencing decisions that impact the nation's social fabric and democratic values.


36107e6b72b64a32dfce109719e892ad.jpg



Besides that, schools throughout India disseminate distorted information about Hitler's "achievements." In 2004, when Narendra Modi served as Chief Minister of Gujarat, school textbooks published by the Gujarat State Board portrayed Hitler as a hero and glorified fascism. The tenth-grade social studies textbook featured chapters titled "Hitler, the Supremo" and "Internal Achievements of Nazism." The section on the "Ideology of Nazism" praised Hitler for lending "dignity and prestige" to the German government and advocated his policy of opposing Jewish people while advocating the supremacy of the German race. This propagation of such information presents a concerning view of history, glossing over the atrocities committed during the Nazi regime and endorsing ideologies that have caused immense harm and suffering.



The textbooks in India have undergone methodological changes to portray Indian Muslims in a negative light, promoting the ideology of the BJP-RSS regime. The new textbooks highlight ancient mythological and medieval Hindu rulers in a glorifying manner, while demonizing historical Mughals. Additionally, the textbooks elevate the current BJP prime minister, Narendra Modi, in a favorable manner.

One concerning example is an excerpt from the grade 6 textbook that targets non-vegetarians, often seen as a stand-in for Muslims. The passage unfairly stereotypes this group, making sweeping negative generalizations. The passage portrays non-vegetarians as people who are dishonest, untruthful, violent, and prone to committing sex crimes, perpetuating harmful biases and prejudices.

In 1922, the National Socialists formed the Hitlerjugend or Hitler Youth, a youth branch aimed at training and recruiting young Germans for the Nazi regime. The organization's outreach and indoctrination strategies were
remarkably effective, as evidenced by its rapid growth from 100,000 to over 2 million members by the end of 1933.
As the Nazi party's influence expanded, the Hitler Youth played a crucial role in providing soldiers for the warfront. The indoctrination techniques employed ensured that the youngsters followed orders without question and participated readily in paramilitary exercises.
Similarly, the BJP-RSS regime in India is committed to indoctrinating children with supremacist ideologies, adhering to the belief of "catching them young." The Bajrang Dal, labeled as a militant religious organization by the CIA in 2018, was reported by The Wall Street Journal to sell firearms and ammunition to its members on Facebook. Moreover, the RSS itself operates as a paramilitary organization, conducting daily trainings in 50,000 locations.
RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat has claimed that the RSS can mobilize an army within three days if necessary, and several RSS-affiliated groups have their own militias referred to as "armies."

The Nazis initiated a malicious campaign to dehumanize and marginalize Jews long before the establishment of concentration camps. Propaganda posters and films portrayed Jews as "vermin," comparing them to rats and insects. German doctors propagated the false notion that Jews spread disease, particularly typhus, which led to outbreaks. In a similar vein, Hindutva extremists and Indian nationalists in present-day India are reviving the concept of "rakshasas" to justify violence against Muslims.

The term "rakshasa" holds deep significance in Hindu religious literature, symbolizing evil and man-eating cannibals. Hindutva ideologues, like the popular Hindu monk Narsinghanand, define Muslims as "rakshasas" to religiously legitimize violence against them, painting Muslims as legitimate enemies worthy of extermination. This dehumanizing classification also justifies sexual violence against Muslim women, as the Hindu book of laws, Manusmriti, subjects "rakshasas" to kidnapping, bride capture, and other forms of sexual violence.
The Indian daily evening newspaper, The Star of Mysore, referred to the Muslim community as "rotten apples" and advocated for getting "rid" of them. Additionally, at an August 2021 rally held at the historic Jantar Mantar observatory in Delhi, pamphlets were distributed equating Muslims to pigs and calling for the annihilation of Islam.


In conclusion, the rise of Hindutva ideology and the manifestations of the Nazification of India have vindicated the Two-nation Theory. The glorification of figures like Hitler in school textbooks and the portrayal of Indian Muslims in a negative light reflect a deliberate attempt to marginalize religious minorities and assert a dominant Hindu identity. These actions exhibit notable resemblances to the divisive policies of the past, serving as a sharp reminder of the rationale behind the creation of Pakistan on the basis of the Two-nation Theory.

 
This article examines the rising influence of Hindutva ideology, its striking similarities to Nazification, and its implications based on the report titled Nazification of India by a U.S.-based human rights group “Justice for All”.


964d180ea80d672a811ed3b56da0b05e.jpg



The boundaries of Pakistan and India surfaced on the map of the world in 1947. This was accomplished on the basis of the Two-nation Theory. This theory held that there were two nations, Hindus and Muslims living in the sub-continent. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan was the first advocate of the Two-nation Theory in the modern era. He believed that India was a continent and not a country, and that among the vast population of different races and different creeds, Hindus and Muslims were the two major nations on the basis of nationality, religion, way of life, customs, traditions, culture and historical conditions.
The politicization of the Muslim community developed as an effect of three developments. i.e., (i) Various efforts towards Islamic reform and revival during the late 19th and early 20th centuries; (ii) The impact of Hindu-based nationalism; and (iii) The democratization of the government of British India.


In a report titled "Nazification of India" by Justice for All, it is asserted that the BJP-RSS is promoting the ideology of Hindu supremacy known as "Hindutva." Drawing inspiration from Nazi ideologies, Hindutva is believed to be leading to the Nazification of India. Indian Christians and Dalits are also victims of this trend, but the primary focus of this report is on Indian Muslims, who appear to be the main target.


The main reason behind the demand for Pakistan was the maintenance of a separate identity of the Muslim nationhood. Incidents like the Urdu-Hindi controversy (1867), the partition of Bengal (1905), and Hindu revivalism, set the two nations, the Hindus and the Muslims, further apart. The idea of a separate homeland for the Muslims of Northern India as proposed by Allama Iqbal in his famous Allahabad Address showed that the creation of two separate states for the Muslims and Hindus was the only solution. The idea was reiterated during the Sindh provincial meeting of the League, and finally adopted as the official League position in the Lahore Declaration of March 23, 1940. Thus these historical, cultural, religious and social differences between the two nations accelerated the pace of political developments, finally leading to the division of British India.


73a1c863a54653d5e184b790fee14754.jpg



A British lawyer named Cyril Radcliffe, who had never set foot in Asia, was called upon to draw up the borders between the two countries. Arriving in India just days before the partition, Radcliffe drew up a quick plan that was kept secret for the fear that the British would be blamed for the violence that would surely ensue. The weeks and months leading up to and following the partition saw unprecedented levels of rioting, violence, loss of property, rape, abduction and murder. The violence was worse in the two halves of Punjab, as Hindus headed in one direction and Muslims in another, with Sikhs and other minorities caught in the middle.

Some of the worst atrocities took place in the Punjab. Despite the efforts of the 55,000-strong Punjab Boundary Force, over 200,000 people were murdered. Ten million became refugees in what was the largest population movement in history. Muslims travelled to Pakistan; Sikhs and Hindus to India. Up to a million of these refugees were killed in a series of horrific massacres in the border regions. India and Pakistan’s independence at midnight on August 14-15, 1947 was a key moment in the history of the British Empire. India had been its cornerstone and many colonies had been secured in order to protect the trade routes to it. What's more, the British withdrawal was clearly seen as a precedent by other parts of the Empire. This hastened their own calls for independence. Almost immediately after independence, tensions between India and Pakistan began to boil over.

Coming back to the present, as Modi's influence grows within India, the country's global standing appears to be diminishing. The rise of Hindutva, a Hindu-centric political and cultural ideology, has gained prominence in India's political landscape. The increasing influence of Hindutva-aligned parties, especially the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has raised concerns about the potential erosion of democratic values and the concentration of power in the hands of a single ideology. This consolidation of power resembles the authoritarian tendencies observed during the Nazi regime in Germany.


The glorification of Hitler goes beyond mere symbolism; it has become a profitable venture. The Indian edition of Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, has become a best-seller since its publication. Additionally, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz notes that Mein Kampf has even entered the mainstream as a "must-read" management strategy book for business school students in India. This notorious polemic continues to generate significant revenue for publishers, perpetuating the problematic trend of glorifying Hitler's ideology in the country.



In 2021, India was downgraded to "partially free" by Freedom House. The Economist Intelligence Unit's Democracy Index categorized the world's largest democracy as a "Flawed Democracy." Additionally, India's media freedom ranking declined significantly, as per the 2022 Reporters Without Borders, placing it at 150th out of 180 countries.

In a report titled "Nazification of India" by Justice for All, it is asserted that the BJP-RSS is promoting the ideology of Hindu supremacy known as "Hindutva." Drawing inspiration from Nazi ideologies, Hindutva is believed to be leading to the Nazification of India. Indian Christians and Dalits are also victims of this trend, but the primary focus of this report is on Indian Muslims, who appear to be the main target.

As Modi's political fortunes rise, India's international reputation faces challenges, with assessments from various global indices and organizations indicating declining trends in media freedom and democratic practices. The report by Justice for All highlights the concerning influence of Hindutva ideology and its potential impact on the country's social and religious dynamics, particularly for Indian Muslims.
In today's India, Adolf Hitler, a universally recognized symbol of unfettered hatred, is being glorified, and his hateful ideology is shamelessly promoted. Surprisingly, there are businesses named after Hitler in the country. Moreover, school textbooks praise Hitler for his achievements while conveniently ignoring his genocidal actions against Jews and other minorities.


Besides that, schools throughout India disseminate distorted information about Hitler's "achievements." In 2004, when Narendra Modi served as Chief Minister of Gujarat, school textbooks published by the Gujarat State Board portrayed Hitler as a hero and glorified fascism. The tenth-grade social studies textbook featured chapters titled "Hitler, the Supremo" and "Internal Achievements of Nazism."


Tragically, instances of pogroms targeting Muslims lead to the loss of their homes, forcing them to seek refuge in safer neighborhoods where other marginalized Muslim communities reside. This ongoing process has resulted in the slow establishment of Muslim enclaves within cities. As the BJP-RSS regime pursues its path towards the Hinduization of India, these Muslim enclaves become vulnerable spaces, surrounded and dependent on the majority Hindu population, making them easier targets for discrimination and hostility.



The glorification of Hitler goes beyond mere symbolism; it has become a profitable venture. The Indian edition of Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, has become a best-seller since its publication. Additionally, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz notes that Mein Kampf has even entered the mainstream as a "must-read" management strategy book for business school students in India. This notorious polemic continues to
generate significant revenue for publishers, perpetuating the problematic trend of glorifying Hitler's ideology in the country.
According to The Times of India, various products like coffee mugs, posters featuring Swastika and Hitler, laptop casings resembling the Stahlhelm worn by Hitler's troops, T-shirts, cardigans, coasters, spikebusters, extension cords, locks, iPhone covers, jewelry boxes, and lamp stands are being sold on popular e-commerce platforms such as Amazon and Flipkart, all with the association of Hitler's name.
This phenomenon reflects how Indian consumer culture and educational programming is contributing to the glorification of Hitler. By normalizing his image and promoting products linked to him, the country's citizens would be influenced to view Hitler and his ideologies more favorably.
India's segregation into ghettos follows a pattern that aligns with the majoritarianism of the BJP-RSS regime. Muslims often face obstacles in obtaining rental properties in upscale city areas. Disturbingly, some rental ads explicitly discourage Muslim applicants. The discriminatory practices extend to property sales, where Muslims are denied access based on various pretexts, and some developers outright refuse to sell to them. In Gujarat, there are even laws reinforcing this bias.



Tragically, instances of pogroms targeting Muslims lead to the loss of their homes, forcing them to seek refuge in safer neighborhoods where other marginalized Muslim communities reside. This ongoing process has resulted in the slow establishment of Muslim enclaves within cities. As the BJP-RSS regime pursues its path towards the Hinduization of India, these Muslim enclaves become vulnerable spaces, surrounded and dependent on the majority Hindu population, making them easier targets for discrimination and hostility.


One concerning example is an excerpt from the grade 6 textbook that targets non-vegetarians, often seen as a stand-in for Muslims. The passage unfairly stereotypes this group, making sweeping negative generalizations. The passage portrays non-vegetarians as people who are dishonest, untruthful, violent, and prone to committing sex crimes, perpetuating harmful biases and prejudices.


The term "rakshasa" holds deep significance in Hindu religious literature, symbolizing evil and man-eating cannibals. Hindutva ideologues, like the popular Hindu monk Narsinghanand, define Muslims as "rakshasas" to religiously legitimize violence against them, painting Muslims as legitimate enemies worthy of extermination. This dehumanizing classification also justifies sexual violence against Muslim women, as the Hindu book of laws, Manusmriti, subjects "rakshasas" to kidnapping, bride capture, and other forms of sexual violence.




Both the Nazis' destruction of synagogues in Germany and the targeting of Muslim mosques in India by the RSS bear similarities in their intent to erase the presence of religious minorities. Before Kristallnacht, the Nazis ordered the demolition of synagogues in various German cities, while anti-Jewish vandalism became widespread in other areas. Similarly, in India, the RSS has been involved in demolishing mosques as part of their ideological agenda, seeking to marginalize and erase the presence of the Muslim community. Both actions represent attempts to eliminate physical reminders of religious diversity and assert dominance of a particular ideology.




On December 6th, 1992, a significant group affiliated with the RSS, known as Vishva Hindu Parishad, and led by prominent BJP leaders, demolished the 16th-century Babri mosque. Their actions were based on an unproven claim that the mosque stood on the birthplace of the mythological Hindu God Rama. Subsequently, widespread attacks on Muslims erupted throughout India, leading to the tragic death of at least 2,000 people, with the majority being Muslims.

Shockingly, nearly three decades after the incident, a special court acquitted all 32 individuals accused of the illegal demolition of the historic mosque. Furthermore, despite the court's ruling that the destruction was illegal, the land was allocated to the very people who were responsible for the mosque's destruction, on the basis of their strong belief in its connection to Rama's birthplace.

This development highlights concerns about a compromised judiciary under the BJP-RSS regime, where Hindutva ideology appears to take precedence over principles of justice and international norms. The incident serves as another manifestation of the challenges posed by extremist ideologies influencing decisions that impact the nation's social fabric and democratic values.


36107e6b72b64a32dfce109719e892ad.jpg



Besides that, schools throughout India disseminate distorted information about Hitler's "achievements." In 2004, when Narendra Modi served as Chief Minister of Gujarat, school textbooks published by the Gujarat State Board portrayed Hitler as a hero and glorified fascism. The tenth-grade social studies textbook featured chapters titled "Hitler, the Supremo" and "Internal Achievements of Nazism." The section on the "Ideology of Nazism" praised Hitler for lending "dignity and prestige" to the German government and advocated his policy of opposing Jewish people while advocating the supremacy of the German race. This propagation of such information presents a concerning view of history, glossing over the atrocities committed during the Nazi regime and endorsing ideologies that have caused immense harm and suffering.



The textbooks in India have undergone methodological changes to portray Indian Muslims in a negative light, promoting the ideology of the BJP-RSS regime. The new textbooks highlight ancient mythological and medieval Hindu rulers in a glorifying manner, while demonizing historical Mughals. Additionally, the textbooks elevate the current BJP prime minister, Narendra Modi, in a favorable manner.

One concerning example is an excerpt from the grade 6 textbook that targets non-vegetarians, often seen as a stand-in for Muslims. The passage unfairly stereotypes this group, making sweeping negative generalizations. The passage portrays non-vegetarians as people who are dishonest, untruthful, violent, and prone to committing sex crimes, perpetuating harmful biases and prejudices.

In 1922, the National Socialists formed the Hitlerjugend or Hitler Youth, a youth branch aimed at training and recruiting young Germans for the Nazi regime. The organization's outreach and indoctrination strategies were
remarkably effective, as evidenced by its rapid growth from 100,000 to over 2 million members by the end of 1933.
As the Nazi party's influence expanded, the Hitler Youth played a crucial role in providing soldiers for the warfront. The indoctrination techniques employed ensured that the youngsters followed orders without question and participated readily in paramilitary exercises.
Similarly, the BJP-RSS regime in India is committed to indoctrinating children with supremacist ideologies, adhering to the belief of "catching them young." The Bajrang Dal, labeled as a militant religious organization by the CIA in 2018, was reported by The Wall Street Journal to sell firearms and ammunition to its members on Facebook. Moreover, the RSS itself operates as a paramilitary organization, conducting daily trainings in 50,000 locations.
RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat has claimed that the RSS can mobilize an army within three days if necessary, and several RSS-affiliated groups have their own militias referred to as "armies."

The Nazis initiated a malicious campaign to dehumanize and marginalize Jews long before the establishment of concentration camps. Propaganda posters and films portrayed Jews as "vermin," comparing them to rats and insects. German doctors propagated the false notion that Jews spread disease, particularly typhus, which led to outbreaks. In a similar vein, Hindutva extremists and Indian nationalists in present-day India are reviving the concept of "rakshasas" to justify violence against Muslims.

The term "rakshasa" holds deep significance in Hindu religious literature, symbolizing evil and man-eating cannibals. Hindutva ideologues, like the popular Hindu monk Narsinghanand, define Muslims as "rakshasas" to religiously legitimize violence against them, painting Muslims as legitimate enemies worthy of extermination. This dehumanizing classification also justifies sexual violence against Muslim women, as the Hindu book of laws, Manusmriti, subjects "rakshasas" to kidnapping, bride capture, and other forms of sexual violence.
The Indian daily evening newspaper, The Star of Mysore, referred to the Muslim community as "rotten apples" and advocated for getting "rid" of them. Additionally, at an August 2021 rally held at the historic Jantar Mantar observatory in Delhi, pamphlets were distributed equating Muslims to pigs and calling for the annihilation of Islam.


In conclusion, the rise of Hindutva ideology and the manifestations of the Nazification of India have vindicated the Two-nation Theory. The glorification of figures like Hitler in school textbooks and the portrayal of Indian Muslims in a negative light reflect a deliberate attempt to marginalize religious minorities and assert a dominant Hindu identity. These actions exhibit notable resemblances to the divisive policies of the past, serving as a sharp reminder of the rationale behind the creation of Pakistan on the basis of the Two-nation Theory.


Creation of Bangladesh disproved 2 nation theory.
 
This article examines the rising influence of Hindutva ideology, its striking similarities to Nazification, and its implications based on the report titled Nazification of India by a U.S.-based human rights group “Justice for All”.


964d180ea80d672a811ed3b56da0b05e.jpg



The boundaries of Pakistan and India surfaced on the map of the world in 1947. This was accomplished on the basis of the Two-nation Theory. This theory held that there were two nations, Hindus and Muslims living in the sub-continent. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan was the first advocate of the Two-nation Theory in the modern era. He believed that India was a continent and not a country, and that among the vast population of different races and different creeds, Hindus and Muslims were the two major nations on the basis of nationality, religion, way of life, customs, traditions, culture and historical conditions.
The politicization of the Muslim community developed as an effect of three developments. i.e., (i) Various efforts towards Islamic reform and revival during the late 19th and early 20th centuries; (ii) The impact of Hindu-based nationalism; and (iii) The democratization of the government of British India.


In a report titled "Nazification of India" by Justice for All, it is asserted that the BJP-RSS is promoting the ideology of Hindu supremacy known as "Hindutva." Drawing inspiration from Nazi ideologies, Hindutva is believed to be leading to the Nazification of India. Indian Christians and Dalits are also victims of this trend, but the primary focus of this report is on Indian Muslims, who appear to be the main target.


The main reason behind the demand for Pakistan was the maintenance of a separate identity of the Muslim nationhood. Incidents like the Urdu-Hindi controversy (1867), the partition of Bengal (1905), and Hindu revivalism, set the two nations, the Hindus and the Muslims, further apart. The idea of a separate homeland for the Muslims of Northern India as proposed by Allama Iqbal in his famous Allahabad Address showed that the creation of two separate states for the Muslims and Hindus was the only solution. The idea was reiterated during the Sindh provincial meeting of the League, and finally adopted as the official League position in the Lahore Declaration of March 23, 1940. Thus these historical, cultural, religious and social differences between the two nations accelerated the pace of political developments, finally leading to the division of British India.


73a1c863a54653d5e184b790fee14754.jpg



A British lawyer named Cyril Radcliffe, who had never set foot in Asia, was called upon to draw up the borders between the two countries. Arriving in India just days before the partition, Radcliffe drew up a quick plan that was kept secret for the fear that the British would be blamed for the violence that would surely ensue. The weeks and months leading up to and following the partition saw unprecedented levels of rioting, violence, loss of property, rape, abduction and murder. The violence was worse in the two halves of Punjab, as Hindus headed in one direction and Muslims in another, with Sikhs and other minorities caught in the middle.

Some of the worst atrocities took place in the Punjab. Despite the efforts of the 55,000-strong Punjab Boundary Force, over 200,000 people were murdered. Ten million became refugees in what was the largest population movement in history. Muslims travelled to Pakistan; Sikhs and Hindus to India. Up to a million of these refugees were killed in a series of horrific massacres in the border regions. India and Pakistan’s independence at midnight on August 14-15, 1947 was a key moment in the history of the British Empire. India had been its cornerstone and many colonies had been secured in order to protect the trade routes to it. What's more, the British withdrawal was clearly seen as a precedent by other parts of the Empire. This hastened their own calls for independence. Almost immediately after independence, tensions between India and Pakistan began to boil over.

Coming back to the present, as Modi's influence grows within India, the country's global standing appears to be diminishing. The rise of Hindutva, a Hindu-centric political and cultural ideology, has gained prominence in India's political landscape. The increasing influence of Hindutva-aligned parties, especially the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has raised concerns about the potential erosion of democratic values and the concentration of power in the hands of a single ideology. This consolidation of power resembles the authoritarian tendencies observed during the Nazi regime in Germany.


The glorification of Hitler goes beyond mere symbolism; it has become a profitable venture. The Indian edition of Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, has become a best-seller since its publication. Additionally, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz notes that Mein Kampf has even entered the mainstream as a "must-read" management strategy book for business school students in India. This notorious polemic continues to generate significant revenue for publishers, perpetuating the problematic trend of glorifying Hitler's ideology in the country.



In 2021, India was downgraded to "partially free" by Freedom House. The Economist Intelligence Unit's Democracy Index categorized the world's largest democracy as a "Flawed Democracy." Additionally, India's media freedom ranking declined significantly, as per the 2022 Reporters Without Borders, placing it at 150th out of 180 countries.

In a report titled "Nazification of India" by Justice for All, it is asserted that the BJP-RSS is promoting the ideology of Hindu supremacy known as "Hindutva." Drawing inspiration from Nazi ideologies, Hindutva is believed to be leading to the Nazification of India. Indian Christians and Dalits are also victims of this trend, but the primary focus of this report is on Indian Muslims, who appear to be the main target.

As Modi's political fortunes rise, India's international reputation faces challenges, with assessments from various global indices and organizations indicating declining trends in media freedom and democratic practices. The report by Justice for All highlights the concerning influence of Hindutva ideology and its potential impact on the country's social and religious dynamics, particularly for Indian Muslims.
In today's India, Adolf Hitler, a universally recognized symbol of unfettered hatred, is being glorified, and his hateful ideology is shamelessly promoted. Surprisingly, there are businesses named after Hitler in the country. Moreover, school textbooks praise Hitler for his achievements while conveniently ignoring his genocidal actions against Jews and other minorities.


Besides that, schools throughout India disseminate distorted information about Hitler's "achievements." In 2004, when Narendra Modi served as Chief Minister of Gujarat, school textbooks published by the Gujarat State Board portrayed Hitler as a hero and glorified fascism. The tenth-grade social studies textbook featured chapters titled "Hitler, the Supremo" and "Internal Achievements of Nazism."


Tragically, instances of pogroms targeting Muslims lead to the loss of their homes, forcing them to seek refuge in safer neighborhoods where other marginalized Muslim communities reside. This ongoing process has resulted in the slow establishment of Muslim enclaves within cities. As the BJP-RSS regime pursues its path towards the Hinduization of India, these Muslim enclaves become vulnerable spaces, surrounded and dependent on the majority Hindu population, making them easier targets for discrimination and hostility.



The glorification of Hitler goes beyond mere symbolism; it has become a profitable venture. The Indian edition of Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, has become a best-seller since its publication. Additionally, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz notes that Mein Kampf has even entered the mainstream as a "must-read" management strategy book for business school students in India. This notorious polemic continues to
generate significant revenue for publishers, perpetuating the problematic trend of glorifying Hitler's ideology in the country.
According to The Times of India, various products like coffee mugs, posters featuring Swastika and Hitler, laptop casings resembling the Stahlhelm worn by Hitler's troops, T-shirts, cardigans, coasters, spikebusters, extension cords, locks, iPhone covers, jewelry boxes, and lamp stands are being sold on popular e-commerce platforms such as Amazon and Flipkart, all with the association of Hitler's name.
This phenomenon reflects how Indian consumer culture and educational programming is contributing to the glorification of Hitler. By normalizing his image and promoting products linked to him, the country's citizens would be influenced to view Hitler and his ideologies more favorably.
India's segregation into ghettos follows a pattern that aligns with the majoritarianism of the BJP-RSS regime. Muslims often face obstacles in obtaining rental properties in upscale city areas. Disturbingly, some rental ads explicitly discourage Muslim applicants. The discriminatory practices extend to property sales, where Muslims are denied access based on various pretexts, and some developers outright refuse to sell to them. In Gujarat, there are even laws reinforcing this bias.



Tragically, instances of pogroms targeting Muslims lead to the loss of their homes, forcing them to seek refuge in safer neighborhoods where other marginalized Muslim communities reside. This ongoing process has resulted in the slow establishment of Muslim enclaves within cities. As the BJP-RSS regime pursues its path towards the Hinduization of India, these Muslim enclaves become vulnerable spaces, surrounded and dependent on the majority Hindu population, making them easier targets for discrimination and hostility.


One concerning example is an excerpt from the grade 6 textbook that targets non-vegetarians, often seen as a stand-in for Muslims. The passage unfairly stereotypes this group, making sweeping negative generalizations. The passage portrays non-vegetarians as people who are dishonest, untruthful, violent, and prone to committing sex crimes, perpetuating harmful biases and prejudices.


The term "rakshasa" holds deep significance in Hindu religious literature, symbolizing evil and man-eating cannibals. Hindutva ideologues, like the popular Hindu monk Narsinghanand, define Muslims as "rakshasas" to religiously legitimize violence against them, painting Muslims as legitimate enemies worthy of extermination. This dehumanizing classification also justifies sexual violence against Muslim women, as the Hindu book of laws, Manusmriti, subjects "rakshasas" to kidnapping, bride capture, and other forms of sexual violence.




Both the Nazis' destruction of synagogues in Germany and the targeting of Muslim mosques in India by the RSS bear similarities in their intent to erase the presence of religious minorities. Before Kristallnacht, the Nazis ordered the demolition of synagogues in various German cities, while anti-Jewish vandalism became widespread in other areas. Similarly, in India, the RSS has been involved in demolishing mosques as part of their ideological agenda, seeking to marginalize and erase the presence of the Muslim community. Both actions represent attempts to eliminate physical reminders of religious diversity and assert dominance of a particular ideology.




On December 6th, 1992, a significant group affiliated with the RSS, known as Vishva Hindu Parishad, and led by prominent BJP leaders, demolished the 16th-century Babri mosque. Their actions were based on an unproven claim that the mosque stood on the birthplace of the mythological Hindu God Rama. Subsequently, widespread attacks on Muslims erupted throughout India, leading to the tragic death of at least 2,000 people, with the majority being Muslims.

Shockingly, nearly three decades after the incident, a special court acquitted all 32 individuals accused of the illegal demolition of the historic mosque. Furthermore, despite the court's ruling that the destruction was illegal, the land was allocated to the very people who were responsible for the mosque's destruction, on the basis of their strong belief in its connection to Rama's birthplace.

This development highlights concerns about a compromised judiciary under the BJP-RSS regime, where Hindutva ideology appears to take precedence over principles of justice and international norms. The incident serves as another manifestation of the challenges posed by extremist ideologies influencing decisions that impact the nation's social fabric and democratic values.


36107e6b72b64a32dfce109719e892ad.jpg



Besides that, schools throughout India disseminate distorted information about Hitler's "achievements." In 2004, when Narendra Modi served as Chief Minister of Gujarat, school textbooks published by the Gujarat State Board portrayed Hitler as a hero and glorified fascism. The tenth-grade social studies textbook featured chapters titled "Hitler, the Supremo" and "Internal Achievements of Nazism." The section on the "Ideology of Nazism" praised Hitler for lending "dignity and prestige" to the German government and advocated his policy of opposing Jewish people while advocating the supremacy of the German race. This propagation of such information presents a concerning view of history, glossing over the atrocities committed during the Nazi regime and endorsing ideologies that have caused immense harm and suffering.



The textbooks in India have undergone methodological changes to portray Indian Muslims in a negative light, promoting the ideology of the BJP-RSS regime. The new textbooks highlight ancient mythological and medieval Hindu rulers in a glorifying manner, while demonizing historical Mughals. Additionally, the textbooks elevate the current BJP prime minister, Narendra Modi, in a favorable manner.

One concerning example is an excerpt from the grade 6 textbook that targets non-vegetarians, often seen as a stand-in for Muslims. The passage unfairly stereotypes this group, making sweeping negative generalizations. The passage portrays non-vegetarians as people who are dishonest, untruthful, violent, and prone to committing sex crimes, perpetuating harmful biases and prejudices.

In 1922, the National Socialists formed the Hitlerjugend or Hitler Youth, a youth branch aimed at training and recruiting young Germans for the Nazi regime. The organization's outreach and indoctrination strategies were
remarkably effective, as evidenced by its rapid growth from 100,000 to over 2 million members by the end of 1933.
As the Nazi party's influence expanded, the Hitler Youth played a crucial role in providing soldiers for the warfront. The indoctrination techniques employed ensured that the youngsters followed orders without question and participated readily in paramilitary exercises.
Similarly, the BJP-RSS regime in India is committed to indoctrinating children with supremacist ideologies, adhering to the belief of "catching them young." The Bajrang Dal, labeled as a militant religious organization by the CIA in 2018, was reported by The Wall Street Journal to sell firearms and ammunition to its members on Facebook. Moreover, the RSS itself operates as a paramilitary organization, conducting daily trainings in 50,000 locations.
RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat has claimed that the RSS can mobilize an army within three days if necessary, and several RSS-affiliated groups have their own militias referred to as "armies."

The Nazis initiated a malicious campaign to dehumanize and marginalize Jews long before the establishment of concentration camps. Propaganda posters and films portrayed Jews as "vermin," comparing them to rats and insects. German doctors propagated the false notion that Jews spread disease, particularly typhus, which led to outbreaks. In a similar vein, Hindutva extremists and Indian nationalists in present-day India are reviving the concept of "rakshasas" to justify violence against Muslims.

The term "rakshasa" holds deep significance in Hindu religious literature, symbolizing evil and man-eating cannibals. Hindutva ideologues, like the popular Hindu monk Narsinghanand, define Muslims as "rakshasas" to religiously legitimize violence against them, painting Muslims as legitimate enemies worthy of extermination. This dehumanizing classification also justifies sexual violence against Muslim women, as the Hindu book of laws, Manusmriti, subjects "rakshasas" to kidnapping, bride capture, and other forms of sexual violence.
The Indian daily evening newspaper, The Star of Mysore, referred to the Muslim community as "rotten apples" and advocated for getting "rid" of them. Additionally, at an August 2021 rally held at the historic Jantar Mantar observatory in Delhi, pamphlets were distributed equating Muslims to pigs and calling for the annihilation of Islam.


In conclusion, the rise of Hindutva ideology and the manifestations of the Nazification of India have vindicated the Two-nation Theory. The glorification of figures like Hitler in school textbooks and the portrayal of Indian Muslims in a negative light reflect a deliberate attempt to marginalize religious minorities and assert a dominant Hindu identity. These actions exhibit notable resemblances to the divisive policies of the past, serving as a sharp reminder of the rationale behind the creation of Pakistan on the basis of the Two-nation Theory.

1525617-thequintffdcdeaefcafmusharrafcoup-1507436564-400x230.jpg

You support these scums?
 
As the last few years have shown, the nazification of Indian is progressing rapidly, making it a brutal place for minorities to survive.

This para from Dexter Filkins article in the New Yorker always remained in my mind:

A feeling of despair has settled in among many Indians who remain committed to the secular, inclusive vision of the country’s founders. “Gandhi and Nehru were great, historic figures, but I think they were an aberration,” Prasad, the former Outlook editor, told me. “It’s very different now. The institutions have crumbled—universities, investigative agencies, the courts, the media, the administrative agencies, public services. And I think there is no rational answer for what has happened, except that we pretended to be what we were for fifty, sixty years. But we are now reverting to what we always wanted to be, which is to pummel minorities, to push them into a corner, to show them their places, to conquer Kashmir, to ruin the media, and to make corporations servants of the state. And all of this under a heavy resurgence of Hinduism. India is becoming the country it has always wanted to be.”

 
As the last few years have shown, the nazification of Indian is progressing rapidly, making it a brutal place for minorities to survive.

This para from Dexter Filkins article in the New Yorker always remained in my mind:

A feeling of despair has settled in among many Indians who remain committed to the secular, inclusive vision of the country’s founders. “Gandhi and Nehru were great, historic figures, but I think they were an aberration,” Prasad, the former Outlook editor, told me. “It’s very different now. The institutions have crumbled—universities, investigative agencies, the courts, the media, the administrative agencies, public services. And I think there is no rational answer for what has happened, except that we pretended to be what we were for fifty, sixty years. But we are now reverting to what we always wanted to be, which is to pummel minorities, to push them into a corner, to show them their places, to conquer Kashmir, to ruin the media, and to make corporations servants of the state. And all of this under a heavy resurgence of Hinduism. India is becoming the country it has always wanted to be.”


Still better than living in the corrupt banana republic of Faujistan!
 
This article examines the rising influence of Hindutva ideology, its striking similarities to Nazification, and its implications based on the report titled Nazification of India by a U.S.-based human rights group “Justice for All”.


964d180ea80d672a811ed3b56da0b05e.jpg



The boundaries of Pakistan and India surfaced on the map of the world in 1947. This was accomplished on the basis of the Two-nation Theory. This theory held that there were two nations, Hindus and Muslims living in the sub-continent. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan was the first advocate of the Two-nation Theory in the modern era. He believed that India was a continent and not a country, and that among the vast population of different races and different creeds, Hindus and Muslims were the two major nations on the basis of nationality, religion, way of life, customs, traditions, culture and historical conditions.
The politicization of the Muslim community developed as an effect of three developments. i.e., (i) Various efforts towards Islamic reform and revival during the late 19th and early 20th centuries; (ii) The impact of Hindu-based nationalism; and (iii) The democratization of the government of British India.


In a report titled "Nazification of India" by Justice for All, it is asserted that the BJP-RSS is promoting the ideology of Hindu supremacy known as "Hindutva." Drawing inspiration from Nazi ideologies, Hindutva is believed to be leading to the Nazification of India. Indian Christians and Dalits are also victims of this trend, but the primary focus of this report is on Indian Muslims, who appear to be the main target.


The main reason behind the demand for Pakistan was the maintenance of a separate identity of the Muslim nationhood. Incidents like the Urdu-Hindi controversy (1867), the partition of Bengal (1905), and Hindu revivalism, set the two nations, the Hindus and the Muslims, further apart. The idea of a separate homeland for the Muslims of Northern India as proposed by Allama Iqbal in his famous Allahabad Address showed that the creation of two separate states for the Muslims and Hindus was the only solution. The idea was reiterated during the Sindh provincial meeting of the League, and finally adopted as the official League position in the Lahore Declaration of March 23, 1940. Thus these historical, cultural, religious and social differences between the two nations accelerated the pace of political developments, finally leading to the division of British India.


73a1c863a54653d5e184b790fee14754.jpg



A British lawyer named Cyril Radcliffe, who had never set foot in Asia, was called upon to draw up the borders between the two countries. Arriving in India just days before the partition, Radcliffe drew up a quick plan that was kept secret for the fear that the British would be blamed for the violence that would surely ensue. The weeks and months leading up to and following the partition saw unprecedented levels of rioting, violence, loss of property, rape, abduction and murder. The violence was worse in the two halves of Punjab, as Hindus headed in one direction and Muslims in another, with Sikhs and other minorities caught in the middle.

Some of the worst atrocities took place in the Punjab. Despite the efforts of the 55,000-strong Punjab Boundary Force, over 200,000 people were murdered. Ten million became refugees in what was the largest population movement in history. Muslims travelled to Pakistan; Sikhs and Hindus to India. Up to a million of these refugees were killed in a series of horrific massacres in the border regions. India and Pakistan’s independence at midnight on August 14-15, 1947 was a key moment in the history of the British Empire. India had been its cornerstone and many colonies had been secured in order to protect the trade routes to it. What's more, the British withdrawal was clearly seen as a precedent by other parts of the Empire. This hastened their own calls for independence. Almost immediately after independence, tensions between India and Pakistan began to boil over.

Coming back to the present, as Modi's influence grows within India, the country's global standing appears to be diminishing. The rise of Hindutva, a Hindu-centric political and cultural ideology, has gained prominence in India's political landscape. The increasing influence of Hindutva-aligned parties, especially the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has raised concerns about the potential erosion of democratic values and the concentration of power in the hands of a single ideology. This consolidation of power resembles the authoritarian tendencies observed during the Nazi regime in Germany.


The glorification of Hitler goes beyond mere symbolism; it has become a profitable venture. The Indian edition of Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, has become a best-seller since its publication. Additionally, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz notes that Mein Kampf has even entered the mainstream as a "must-read" management strategy book for business school students in India. This notorious polemic continues to generate significant revenue for publishers, perpetuating the problematic trend of glorifying Hitler's ideology in the country.



In 2021, India was downgraded to "partially free" by Freedom House. The Economist Intelligence Unit's Democracy Index categorized the world's largest democracy as a "Flawed Democracy." Additionally, India's media freedom ranking declined significantly, as per the 2022 Reporters Without Borders, placing it at 150th out of 180 countries.

In a report titled "Nazification of India" by Justice for All, it is asserted that the BJP-RSS is promoting the ideology of Hindu supremacy known as "Hindutva." Drawing inspiration from Nazi ideologies, Hindutva is believed to be leading to the Nazification of India. Indian Christians and Dalits are also victims of this trend, but the primary focus of this report is on Indian Muslims, who appear to be the main target.

As Modi's political fortunes rise, India's international reputation faces challenges, with assessments from various global indices and organizations indicating declining trends in media freedom and democratic practices. The report by Justice for All highlights the concerning influence of Hindutva ideology and its potential impact on the country's social and religious dynamics, particularly for Indian Muslims.
In today's India, Adolf Hitler, a universally recognized symbol of unfettered hatred, is being glorified, and his hateful ideology is shamelessly promoted. Surprisingly, there are businesses named after Hitler in the country. Moreover, school textbooks praise Hitler for his achievements while conveniently ignoring his genocidal actions against Jews and other minorities.


Besides that, schools throughout India disseminate distorted information about Hitler's "achievements." In 2004, when Narendra Modi served as Chief Minister of Gujarat, school textbooks published by the Gujarat State Board portrayed Hitler as a hero and glorified fascism. The tenth-grade social studies textbook featured chapters titled "Hitler, the Supremo" and "Internal Achievements of Nazism."


Tragically, instances of pogroms targeting Muslims lead to the loss of their homes, forcing them to seek refuge in safer neighborhoods where other marginalized Muslim communities reside. This ongoing process has resulted in the slow establishment of Muslim enclaves within cities. As the BJP-RSS regime pursues its path towards the Hinduization of India, these Muslim enclaves become vulnerable spaces, surrounded and dependent on the majority Hindu population, making them easier targets for discrimination and hostility.



The glorification of Hitler goes beyond mere symbolism; it has become a profitable venture. The Indian edition of Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, has become a best-seller since its publication. Additionally, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz notes that Mein Kampf has even entered the mainstream as a "must-read" management strategy book for business school students in India. This notorious polemic continues to
generate significant revenue for publishers, perpetuating the problematic trend of glorifying Hitler's ideology in the country.
According to The Times of India, various products like coffee mugs, posters featuring Swastika and Hitler, laptop casings resembling the Stahlhelm worn by Hitler's troops, T-shirts, cardigans, coasters, spikebusters, extension cords, locks, iPhone covers, jewelry boxes, and lamp stands are being sold on popular e-commerce platforms such as Amazon and Flipkart, all with the association of Hitler's name.
This phenomenon reflects how Indian consumer culture and educational programming is contributing to the glorification of Hitler. By normalizing his image and promoting products linked to him, the country's citizens would be influenced to view Hitler and his ideologies more favorably.
India's segregation into ghettos follows a pattern that aligns with the majoritarianism of the BJP-RSS regime. Muslims often face obstacles in obtaining rental properties in upscale city areas. Disturbingly, some rental ads explicitly discourage Muslim applicants. The discriminatory practices extend to property sales, where Muslims are denied access based on various pretexts, and some developers outright refuse to sell to them. In Gujarat, there are even laws reinforcing this bias.



Tragically, instances of pogroms targeting Muslims lead to the loss of their homes, forcing them to seek refuge in safer neighborhoods where other marginalized Muslim communities reside. This ongoing process has resulted in the slow establishment of Muslim enclaves within cities. As the BJP-RSS regime pursues its path towards the Hinduization of India, these Muslim enclaves become vulnerable spaces, surrounded and dependent on the majority Hindu population, making them easier targets for discrimination and hostility.


One concerning example is an excerpt from the grade 6 textbook that targets non-vegetarians, often seen as a stand-in for Muslims. The passage unfairly stereotypes this group, making sweeping negative generalizations. The passage portrays non-vegetarians as people who are dishonest, untruthful, violent, and prone to committing sex crimes, perpetuating harmful biases and prejudices.


The term "rakshasa" holds deep significance in Hindu religious literature, symbolizing evil and man-eating cannibals. Hindutva ideologues, like the popular Hindu monk Narsinghanand, define Muslims as "rakshasas" to religiously legitimize violence against them, painting Muslims as legitimate enemies worthy of extermination. This dehumanizing classification also justifies sexual violence against Muslim women, as the Hindu book of laws, Manusmriti, subjects "rakshasas" to kidnapping, bride capture, and other forms of sexual violence.




Both the Nazis' destruction of synagogues in Germany and the targeting of Muslim mosques in India by the RSS bear similarities in their intent to erase the presence of religious minorities. Before Kristallnacht, the Nazis ordered the demolition of synagogues in various German cities, while anti-Jewish vandalism became widespread in other areas. Similarly, in India, the RSS has been involved in demolishing mosques as part of their ideological agenda, seeking to marginalize and erase the presence of the Muslim community. Both actions represent attempts to eliminate physical reminders of religious diversity and assert dominance of a particular ideology.




On December 6th, 1992, a significant group affiliated with the RSS, known as Vishva Hindu Parishad, and led by prominent BJP leaders, demolished the 16th-century Babri mosque. Their actions were based on an unproven claim that the mosque stood on the birthplace of the mythological Hindu God Rama. Subsequently, widespread attacks on Muslims erupted throughout India, leading to the tragic death of at least 2,000 people, with the majority being Muslims.

Shockingly, nearly three decades after the incident, a special court acquitted all 32 individuals accused of the illegal demolition of the historic mosque. Furthermore, despite the court's ruling that the destruction was illegal, the land was allocated to the very people who were responsible for the mosque's destruction, on the basis of their strong belief in its connection to Rama's birthplace.

This development highlights concerns about a compromised judiciary under the BJP-RSS regime, where Hindutva ideology appears to take precedence over principles of justice and international norms. The incident serves as another manifestation of the challenges posed by extremist ideologies influencing decisions that impact the nation's social fabric and democratic values.


36107e6b72b64a32dfce109719e892ad.jpg



Besides that, schools throughout India disseminate distorted information about Hitler's "achievements." In 2004, when Narendra Modi served as Chief Minister of Gujarat, school textbooks published by the Gujarat State Board portrayed Hitler as a hero and glorified fascism. The tenth-grade social studies textbook featured chapters titled "Hitler, the Supremo" and "Internal Achievements of Nazism." The section on the "Ideology of Nazism" praised Hitler for lending "dignity and prestige" to the German government and advocated his policy of opposing Jewish people while advocating the supremacy of the German race. This propagation of such information presents a concerning view of history, glossing over the atrocities committed during the Nazi regime and endorsing ideologies that have caused immense harm and suffering.



The textbooks in India have undergone methodological changes to portray Indian Muslims in a negative light, promoting the ideology of the BJP-RSS regime. The new textbooks highlight ancient mythological and medieval Hindu rulers in a glorifying manner, while demonizing historical Mughals. Additionally, the textbooks elevate the current BJP prime minister, Narendra Modi, in a favorable manner.

One concerning example is an excerpt from the grade 6 textbook that targets non-vegetarians, often seen as a stand-in for Muslims. The passage unfairly stereotypes this group, making sweeping negative generalizations. The passage portrays non-vegetarians as people who are dishonest, untruthful, violent, and prone to committing sex crimes, perpetuating harmful biases and prejudices.

In 1922, the National Socialists formed the Hitlerjugend or Hitler Youth, a youth branch aimed at training and recruiting young Germans for the Nazi regime. The organization's outreach and indoctrination strategies were
remarkably effective, as evidenced by its rapid growth from 100,000 to over 2 million members by the end of 1933.
As the Nazi party's influence expanded, the Hitler Youth played a crucial role in providing soldiers for the warfront. The indoctrination techniques employed ensured that the youngsters followed orders without question and participated readily in paramilitary exercises.
Similarly, the BJP-RSS regime in India is committed to indoctrinating children with supremacist ideologies, adhering to the belief of "catching them young." The Bajrang Dal, labeled as a militant religious organization by the CIA in 2018, was reported by The Wall Street Journal to sell firearms and ammunition to its members on Facebook. Moreover, the RSS itself operates as a paramilitary organization, conducting daily trainings in 50,000 locations.
RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat has claimed that the RSS can mobilize an army within three days if necessary, and several RSS-affiliated groups have their own militias referred to as "armies."

The Nazis initiated a malicious campaign to dehumanize and marginalize Jews long before the establishment of concentration camps. Propaganda posters and films portrayed Jews as "vermin," comparing them to rats and insects. German doctors propagated the false notion that Jews spread disease, particularly typhus, which led to outbreaks. In a similar vein, Hindutva extremists and Indian nationalists in present-day India are reviving the concept of "rakshasas" to justify violence against Muslims.

The term "rakshasa" holds deep significance in Hindu religious literature, symbolizing evil and man-eating cannibals. Hindutva ideologues, like the popular Hindu monk Narsinghanand, define Muslims as "rakshasas" to religiously legitimize violence against them, painting Muslims as legitimate enemies worthy of extermination. This dehumanizing classification also justifies sexual violence against Muslim women, as the Hindu book of laws, Manusmriti, subjects "rakshasas" to kidnapping, bride capture, and other forms of sexual violence.
The Indian daily evening newspaper, The Star of Mysore, referred to the Muslim community as "rotten apples" and advocated for getting "rid" of them. Additionally, at an August 2021 rally held at the historic Jantar Mantar observatory in Delhi, pamphlets were distributed equating Muslims to pigs and calling for the annihilation of Islam.


In conclusion, the rise of Hindutva ideology and the manifestations of the Nazification of India have vindicated the Two-nation Theory. The glorification of figures like Hitler in school textbooks and the portrayal of Indian Muslims in a negative light reflect a deliberate attempt to marginalize religious minorities and assert a dominant Hindu identity. These actions exhibit notable resemblances to the divisive policies of the past, serving as a sharp reminder of the rationale behind the creation of Pakistan on the basis of the Two-nation Theory.


Honestly speaking, I am still curious why Pakistani writers justify to their audience of two nation theory. Why justify certain things that do not require justification? Even if India would have been peaceful, and highly secular like other so-called Nordic nations, could you have ever thought to reverse the partition??? If that is not a choice, then what is the point on keep on justifying to himself and saying how bad is India currently?

I think, forget about India, Pakistan intellectuals should ponder why the two-nation theory could not even sustain 25 years of its existence.
 
Last edited:
Honestly speaking, I am still curious why Pakistani writers justify to their audience of two. nation theory. Why justify certain things that do not require justification? Even if India would have been peaceful, and highly secular like other so-called Nordic nations, could you have ever thought to reverse the partition??? If that is not a choice, then what is the point on keep on justifying to himself and saying how bad is India currently?

I think, forget about India, Pakistan intellectuals should ponder why the two-nation theory could not even sustain 25 years of its existence.
It helps to feel good, as simple as that.
 
Creation of Bangladesh disproved 2 nation theory.

Bangladesh is a free Muslim state as per Partition

Honestly speaking, I am still curious why Pakistani writers justify to their audience of two. nation theory. Why justify certain things that do not require justification? Even if India would have been peaceful, and highly secular like other so-called Nordic nations, could you have ever thought to reverse the partition??? If that is not a choice, then what is the point on keep on justifying to himself and saying how bad is India currently?

I think, forget about India, Pakistan intellectuals should ponder why the two-nation theory could not even sustain 25 years of its existence.

Because India STILL needs to be partitioned

Partition of India is incomplete, Indian Muslims need freedom away from Hindu extremists


Partition of India was right in 1947, it's right in 2023




Hundreds of millions of Indian Muslims cannot be subject to the consequences of the mental baggage Hindus carry after 1000 years of Muslim or other domination, which is something that Jinnah always warned about
 
Two-nation theory does nothing to establish independent Pakistani identity. It logically means Pakistani identity is tied to India. And, it requires violence and discrimination against minorities in India for Pakistanis to feel good about themselves.

The people of Pakistan have their own identity, whether religious or cultural ie Punjabi, Sindhi etc

The two nation theory explains why those identities can't or couldn't exist in a wider India

What is happening NOW to Indian Muslims justifies the decisions took beyond doubt, and also explains the path that hundreds of millions of Indian Muslims need to take

The rights of Indian Muslims are not protected, and their community is gradually growing poorer and more persecuted


So the two nation theory rather than being a thing of the past is very very relevant today and is central to the freedom of Indian Muslims
 
@Signalian has been a strong supporter of PA and is a regular poster of articles trying to sell the idea that PA has been a saviour and prove how bad India is. His quest is to show India in poor light, in an attempt to sell the idea, that how good has establishment been to their nation. A fact everyone knows is so far from the truth.

Now, it is not about the foot soldiers. They always lay down their lives for the nation, but it is the top brass that enjoys the fruits of their labour. Top brass tries to highlight the sacrifices of the foot soldiers to make way into the minds of the populace. Cunning move eh.

Posters like him try and associate Nazification and Facism with India. How did this start?

The term fascism and nazification was associated with India by ISPR, few years back in it’s yearly report. That was the first directive to everyone to get going. We all know that all policies in Paksiatn are decided and driven by the Establishment. Once they used these terms, all the media and political parties were told to toe the same line and hence, these words became the main mode of describing India.

What is the definition of Facism amd Nazism - A way of organizing a society in which a government ruled by a dictator controls the lives of the people and in which people are not allowed to disagree with the government.

Which country in the region has been following this model since it’s inception? You see the current situation in your own home. Media is not even allowed to mention IK. His party was completely destroyed at the behest of we all know whom. How the government changed hands is also in front of us. A judge with very high morals was used to fix IK and subvert the voice of the entire nation. And India is Facist?

A thread on pdf to highlight your establishment’s contribution towards Facism.
Post in thread 'I am not celebrating 14th August this year'
https://pdf.defence.pk/threads/i-am-not-celebrating-14th-august-this-year.773282/post-14472183

@Signalian , I also feel that we have many issues in India. We aren’t the best example of democracy and have seen many ups and downs.

But calling it under nazification and Facism? Please sell this churan where people are blind. If at all, it is your homeland that is closer to it. Don’t laugh on neighbour’s garden fire when your home is on fire, is an adage very apt for your state of mind.
 
Last edited:
Creation of Bangladesh disproved 2 nation theory.

Loss of territory does not prove the theory false. Creation of Bangladesh is a negation of the concept of a united Indian nation.

What you are exhibiting is what is considered a very animalistic behaviour most typified by the avian species called parrot.

Still better than living in the corrupt banana republic of Faujistan!

Miss, You will eventually have to return home along with the 4 kids you kidnapped out of Pakistan.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom