Doesn't refute my point. I would like to know how who was responsible for 60 hindus dieing. Besides, if someone kills 60 people, doesn't mean you go and kill 2000.
Picture this
scenario 1:
60 Hindus returning from Ayodha
Their train is "burnt" near a muslim majority area.All 60 killed
During the burning of the train there were lot of muslims near the train
scenario 2
60 Muslims returning from Mecca
Their train is "burnt" near a hindhu majority area.All 60 killed
During the burning of the train there were lot of hindus were near the train
This is what happened in Godhra
Now you tell me how would the reaction of a muslim be different from a hindu person,if some of his relatives were among the ones killed.
Do you expect common sense to previal in such a situation,be it hindu or muslim
How difficult is for some anti-social elements to add fuel to the sitution?Be it muslim or hindu.
Jumping into conclusion is a favourite pastime in the subcontinent.
when some of the poster being educated,having a better view of the world can jump into conclusion that just because more muslims were killed in the Samjuyota train explosion,hindu extremist are involved,how do you expect these people, who are in the middle of it think better?
The so called leaders of faith get away with heinous crime bcoz people in the sub continent love to jump to conclusion.Fill their ears with little rumours and you have self declared faith protectors ready to kill inocents people to prove it. Be it Hindu or Muslim or for that matter any faith.
There will always be trouble between Pak and India,with the simple reason how they percieve each other.
For an Indian it is an India Pakistan conflict
For an Pakistni it is an Hindu- Muslim conflict.
This is where the trouble lies.How would you have peace when the perception of the conflict itself doesn't match!
Till then expect both sides to blame each other.