What's new

Russian Navy

your fault is you have chosen a wrong name, u should have gone with bollywood nicks or something asian......
Or may be Russians should not have named their warship as Lavina. :coffee:
Btw this is how it looks

I also heard that according to the contract, France cannot sell the helicopter carrier ships to anybody else, without Russia approval..so thats a big loss to France.
upload_2015-6-24_21-55-17.png
 
Or may be Russians should not have named their warship as Lavina. :coffee:
Btw this is how it looks

I also heard that according to the contract, France cannot sell the helicopter carrier ships to anybody else, without Russia approval..so thats a big loss to France.
View attachment 232302
Mmmm, bow doors on a 24k tons vessel. You really want to beach that?

Even if you have the technology equal or superior to someone else's technology - to gain access to them it means to strengthen your position.

Perhaps because the former Soviet aircraft carriers combines the functionality of a cruiser and an aircraft carrier.
As for this ship - it displacement is 17,500 tons. It should yave a big control tower. Zumvalt also has a big one.
But fregates project 2235 - have low silhouette.
View attachment 231116
And another destroer project with less displacement
View attachment 231117
You second pic shows a model based on the Udaloy (project 1155)
Basic 1155
Displacement:
6,930 tons standard
7,570 tons full load


Perspective destroyer Project 23560
A new class of destroyer for the Russian Navy is currently under development by the Krylov State Research Center (KSRC), IHS Jane's was told during a visit to the company.
The new design is called Project 23560E or Shkval (Squall), KSRC's deputy director, Valery Polyakov, who added that a scale model of the design is going to be exhibited for the first time during the International Maritime Defence Show 2015 in St Petersburg from 1-5 July.
"The Project 23560E destroyer is intended to conduct operations in off-shore maritime and oceanic zones, to destroy land and naval targets, to provide combat stability to naval forces, to maintain area anti-air and anti-missile defence, and to complete peacetime tasks in all zones of the world's oceans," said Polyakov.
The Project 23560E destroyer has full-load displacement of 15,000-18,000 tons, a length of 200 m, beam of 23 m, draft of 6.6 m, high speed of 32 kt, cruise speed of 20 kt, endurance of 90 days, and a crew of 250-300.
The destroyer is intended to be powered by a gas turbine engine (although Russia currently lacks any adequate sources for naval gas turbines). It is proposed to be fitted with a battle management system integrated with tactical and operational-tactical ACSs.
The destroyer's armament comprises 60-70 anti-ship or anti-land cruise missiles, 128 surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), and 16-24 anti-submarine missiles. The ship is also equipped with a 130 mm multipurpose naval gun.
The destroyer's integrated electronic package includes a multi-functional phased array radar, electronic warfare subsystem, communications suite, underwater reconnaissance system. The aviation wing consists of two utility helicopters. These specifications could all be changed to suit customer requirements however, Polyakov stated
Russian destroyer design revealed - IHS Jane's 360
 
You really want to beach that?
Thats for the french to decide.
@Gabriel92 pls take a look at this. :)
levina said:
r may be Russians should not have named their warship as Lavina. :coffee:
Btw this is how it looks

I also heard that according to the contract, France cannot sell the helicopter carrier ships to anybody else, without Russia approval..so thats a big loss to France.
upload_2015-6-24_21-55-17-png.232302
 
At the Army-2015 military expo near Moscow, the two projects have come in the open. The initial Project "Priboy" later on turned out to be Project "Lavina" with the actual project "Priboy" being a different model with lighter displacement.

"Lavina"
nZ0XU.jpg


Specification
- displacement: 24,000tons
- max speed: 22 knots
- airwing: 16 helicopters, 6 landing
- 50 armored vehicles
- 6 x Palma air-defence unit

"Priboy"
ZQC9J.jpg


- 14,000t displacement
- 165m length
- 25m beam
- max speed: 20 knots
- range: 6000 nautical miles (can remain 60 days at sea)
- airwing: 4-6 x helicopters (Ka-27, Ka-52K)
- 4 x landing craft pr.11770 Serna or 2 x pr.12061 Murena hovercraft
- can transport up to 60 vehicles
- Pantsir-M airdefence system

Slightly larger than predecessor, the Ivan Rogov class, the dimensions of which are:
- Length 157.5 m
- Beam 24.5 m
- Draught 6.5 m
- Displacement, standard 8 260 tons
- Displacement, full load 14 060 tons
Ivan Rogov Class Amphibiopus Transport Dock | Military-Today.com

Beaching a 24k ton ship places special demands on hull design. A beached unit that is unloading is highly vulnerable to attack. So, I would imagine, only under very special (safe) conditions would one do this. In general, the whole development towards heli-capable dock-landing ships, with faster means of delivering units/cargo over water and through air is to increase stand-off range from the landing zone.... In that sense putting bow-doors on a 24k LHD is ... remarkable.

6Xu3T.jpg


NrA8p.jpg
 
Russian President is the best president in the current time - What a man he is
 
i like "Lavina" it look promising, similer to japanis Izumo-class helicopter destroyer.....................:crazy_pilot:
Japan-puts-helicopter-carrier-Izumo-on-sea-trials.jpg
 
i like "Lavina" it look promising, similer to japanis Izumo-class helicopter destroyer.....................:crazy_pilot:
Japan-puts-helicopter-carrier-Izumo-on-sea-trials.jpg
Except Izumo is larger, has no dock and doesn't crry troops or vehickes or cargo. She is an ASW oriented ship.
 
I'm not convinced that Russians are not capable for building of helicopter carrier ,because the deal was useful for both countries.
With agreement, France have sell ships and employed workers , Russians was thinking that they will have a finished product ,extra time and energy to be spent on building of 4+ and 5 generation submarines what is their strategic task but now with the terminated contract ,for Russia will be too difficult to keep step to their plans.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom