What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

When is arrival of Abrams?

M1 tanks are too fuel thirsty to be used and need too much support. Its not GW3 with limitless US military back up. Leopard are more common and would be easier to maintain and less strain in a logistical capacity. It's not a case of who gives more, nor a case of bravdo..war is horrible dirty business. The end can't come soon enough with Russia pushed back to its borders.
 

When Russia Republicans are at total war with China, would Russia Republicans defend Europe from a Russian invasion given that:
(1) Russia Republicans like Putin
(2) The weapons are needed to destroy China

So logically, European nations need their own massively equipped armies that can fight and defend Europe from the largest land army on the globe (in terms of heavy weapons).

'The EU cannot defend Europe': NATO chief​


Europe needs to re-arm. And have enough ammo for a 5-10 year war with Russia. And don't store the ammo and equipment at large depots, easy targets for Russian missile attack.

If the Chinese arm Russia, this should be more than enough proof the EU armies need to re-arm rapidly and massively.
 
Last edited:
Reported for derailing thread with whataboutism about Iraq.
@Deino
not really exactly the fact about western intelligence and their track history and how they can be faked when needed , in this war or any other war.
and the one who derail the thread is you who try to distort the facts,
track records of western intelligence show that they are not reliable source in this conflict or any other conflict
 
funny part is you criticize and ridicule the Russian army with the words like 2nd strongest army in the world , but forget to mention how much equipment and money Ukraine used on this war .
it was more than what Russia used .
one other thing this war has proven.... that Russia now or a Putin Russia is no less but a much stronger than the former USSR... alone it is facing the whole west for 370 days or so... with the west economical and political war gone to zero effect... and with the army military war so far inflicting damage far more than great losses it suffered ... though things are not perfect or good even... but the Russian army is improving and sustaining the war and the Nato side being exhausted more in comparison which is a key for the long types of war semi success...
too sorry for Ukraine what will be left of it its culture and nice people is a shade of the past.... few months later from now
 
is it important, what is the origin of the chip that guide it . you make the absurd claim that it is more primitive than V1.
it was some ready available equipment that can easily replaced by eastern one as needs arise.
also even when we used solely our domestic built fiberoptic gyroscope for guidance the system were far more precise and sophisticated than v1


is modernized t-72 have anything more modern than a modernized t-64?
t-72 was selected only because the design was simpler than t-64 and easier and cheaper to build not because it was better
You don’t see the difference? I said technology primitive. Take the propulsion. Shaled is powered by a 2 stroke engine much like millions of motorbikes in Vietnam and hundred more countries in the world while V1 by a jet engine. That’s 80y ago.

But anyway Iran suicide drones cause little to no effect to Ukraine military its a terror weapons against population. It plays no role more in this war. First, Putin runs out of drones, and second, Ukraine air defense is getting stronger by the day.
 
one other thing this war has proven.... that Russia now or a Putin Russia is no less but a much stronger than the former USSR... alone it is facing the whole west for 370 days or so... with the west economical and political war gone to zero effect... and with the army military war so far inflicting damage far more than great losses it suffered ... though things are not perfect or good even... but the Russian army is improving and sustaining the war and the Nato side being exhausted more in comparison which is a key for the long types of war semi success...
too sorry for Ukraine what will be left of it its culture and nice people is a shade of the past.... few months later from now
For me even if Russia loses its still the same grizzly bear. Sometimes you have high tech and sometimes low yet with not so high tech in military they have sustained for more than year is a no joke.
 
Rheinmetall delivers close distance air defense system Skynex to Ukraine. A giant 35mm cannon against drones and cruise missiles.

Operational costs 99 percent cheaper than conventional missile defense systems


1677649912786.png


Flugabwehrsystem Skynex © Rheinmetall



Along with automatic surveillance radars SurveilSPIRE


1677650288454.png
 
one other thing this war has proven.... that Russia now or a Putin Russia is no less but a much stronger than the former USSR... alone it is facing the whole west for 370 days or so... with the west economical and political war gone to zero effect... and with the army military war so far inflicting damage far more than great losses it suffered ... though things are not perfect or good even... but the Russian army is improving and sustaining the war and the Nato side being exhausted more in comparison which is a key for the long types of war semi success...
too sorry for Ukraine what will be left of it its culture and nice people is a shade of the past.... few months later from now

Putin's special military operation has imploded it was supposed to be done and dusted within a few weeks regime change and a new land grab One year on the Ukrainian forces are still in existence and they are determined to defend their country and ultimately to recover all the territory stolen by the Russians and that will include the Crimea
 
not really exactly the fact about western intelligence and their track history and how they can be faked when needed , in this war or any other war.
and the one who derail the thread is you who try to distort the facts,
track records of western intelligence show that they are not reliable source in this conflict or any other conflict
”No I am not bad, your’e bad, waah, waah, waah….”
Childish response…
 
Last edited:
The Russian infantry attacking Ukraine defense positions like zombies in bad movies, wave after wave, on foot, with no tanks, no armor support, no air support, no nothing.


 
Well, why??

Your example is Iran sink US carrier, China attack South China Seas and Russia attack Ukraine. There isn't any point for anyone to nuke anyone in all 3 scenarios.

Nuke is not adding milk to cereals, you don't use it unless you have a reason to. I mean sure, China wants to attack South China Seas, so let's nuke US and end the world, then why you want to attack South China Seas to begin with?? Sames goes Russia-Ukraine, North and South Korea, and Pakistan - India.
Well thats start & end of our discussion,
Iran sinks 1 US aircraft carrier - thats all one needs for end of world I guess.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom