What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

Ukraine doesn't stand a chance against Russia its 100% a NATO show.

If Russia wins Ukraine loses.
If Russia loses NATO won.
How do You explain Pakistani shipments of ammunition to Ukraine if it is 100% NATO War?
Australian armoured cars?


The truth is that
Ukraine is fighting the war against Russia, and noone else.
Ukraine gets a lot of help, without which it would have lost - even though the Russian army is totally incompetent.

If Russia wins, the world loses
If Russia loses, the world (minus trolls) wins.
 
So why are you lying your teeth out then?

Ukraine is and was a sovereign country and when the President was about to be impeached in 2014 for selling out Ukraine to Russia, he escaped to Russia with the help of Russian FSB agents. The Ukrainan parliament selected an acting President with 180-0. Yanukovich was still President until his term expired in 2015.
Ukraine then voted in a new President.
Yanukovich was later tried in absentia and found guilty of treason.



That is what they are doing, kicking Russian butts.


You definition of a Western installed puppet seems to be someone which is not a Russian puppet.
Russia/Soviet is an enemy of all its neighbours since a century.



This does not make sense. Statistics show that France contribute more than the UK and the United States compared to GDP.

Your example say that countries which pool the resources to deflect the meteor does not count, only countryspecific initiatives.

Is that really so hard to understand?




France might certainly go it alone.
It’s not hard to understand. The point is France is contributing less than South Korea, who is not in Europe. They are inherently selfish. More so than every/most other European countries. The fact they contribute to GDP means nothing. WHy don’t the rest of the countries stop paying Ukraine, and let’s let everybody’s GDP impact defend against the Russians.

Or why don’t we tell Sweden not to bother joining NATO, surely the GDP of NATO will be all it will need to defeat against a future threat.

And France go it alone, yes, and now they will certainly fail as its beyond most countries ability to produce the next gen on their won.
 


The funny part is only, why should always Europe and the West take care in such cases? Where is a joint and combined Arab & Muslim initiative to solve this issue at first politically and maybe even with military means in the sense of peace keeping forces?

But for you these are surely the same reasons, why only the West should fight hunger and diseases in Africa, why only the West should feed Africa … and Russia can do whatever it wants!
 
The funny part is only, why should always Europe and the West take care in such cases? Where is a joint and combined Arab & Muslim initiative to solve this issue at first politically and maybe even with military means in the sense of peace keeping forces?

But for you these are surely the same reasons, why only the West should fight hunger and diseases in Africa, why only the West should feed Africa … and Russia can do whatever it wants!

Because it's a Western created problem. It was European Jews who stole Palestinian land initially followed by a flock of Zionists from around the world.....All supported by Britain and the US. With regards to the West and Africa, just read the confessions of an economic hitman. Western countries "invested" & colonised much of Africa only to loot them dry. So either the west stops with it's sick foreign policies or they fix the problems they started.
 
It’s not hard to understand. The point is France is contributing less than South Korea, who is not in Europe. They are inherently selfish. More so than every/most other European countries. The fact they contribute to GDP means nothing. WHy don’t the rest of the countries stop paying Ukraine, and let’s let everybody’s GDP impact defend against the Russians.

Or why don’t we tell Sweden not to bother joining NATO, surely the GDP of NATO will be all it will need to defeat against a future threat.

And France go it alone, yes, and now they will certainly fail as its beyond most countries ability to produce the next gen on their won.
You obviously have no clue how this works - at all.

France ships 90% of its aid through the EU.
Your statistics only shows the remaining 10%.

France does not ”contribute to GDP”.

France ships X billion dollars of aid to Ukraine.
France has a GDP of Y billion dollars.

To evaluate how helpful France is, you calculate X/Y.

The US has a GDP of roughly 25,000 billion dollars.
They have provided, lets say, 75 billion dollars.
Their contribution is 75/25,000 or 0,003 of GDP, or 0,3% of GDP.

France has a GDP of roughly 3,000 billion dollars.
They have contributed 0,5% of GDP or $15 billion.
Since 90% is shipped through EU, your statistics only show the remaining 10% according to which France contributes around $1,5B.
That just means that your statistics are wrong

The UK is contributing €13,8 which is around $15B.

So the US contribution is 75/15 = 5 times larger than the contribution of France.
The US economy is 8-9 times larger than the economy of France.

A larger economy can obviously support more than a smaller economy.

France has a population of 68. million. Each Frenchman provides $221 to Ukraine.
The US has a population of 333 million. Each American provided $225 to Ukraine.

ERGO: No real reason to complain about France.
 
Last edited:
But they do know, don't they?

Why does NATO need to get involved.
The Ukrainians seem to be doing pretty well, we just have to give them the arms and sit back with a bottle of Pepsi and the popcorn and enjoy the show.

Ukraine don't need NATO boots on the ground, they are what Russia isn't, a highly trained, highly professional army.
 
You obviously have no clue how this works - at all.

France ships 90% of its aid through the EU.
Your statistics only shows the remaining 10%.

France does not ”contribute to GDP”.

France ships X billion dollars of aid to Ukraine.
France has a GDP of Y billion dollars.

To evaluate how helpful France is, you calculate X/Y.

The US has a GDP of roughly 25,000 billion dollars.
They have provided, lets say, 75 billion dollars.
Their contribution is 75/25,000 or 0,003 of GDP, or 0,3% of GDP.

France has a GDP of roughly 3,000 billion dollars.
They have contributed 0,5% of GDP or $15 billion.
Since 90% is shipped through EU, your statistics only show the remaining 10% according to which France contributes around $1,5B.
That just means that your statistics are wrong

The UK is contributing €13,8 which is around $15B.

So the US contribution is 75/15 = 5 times larger than the contribution of France.
The US economy is 8-9 times larger than the economy of France.

A larger economy can obviously support more than a smaller economy.

France has a population of 68. million. Each Frenchman provides $221 to Ukraine.
The US has a population of 333 million. Each American provided $225 to Ukraine.

ERGO: No real reason to complain about France.
Netherlands, germany, denmark, poland, all support through the EU as well, yet still give more next to the EU.

Netherlands has a population of 18 million. And not much of a standing army.

France is one of europes military powers, wants to be a leading european power….yet seems more then happy to be at the back of the EU pack during this crisis?

That said…americans and britain indeed need to tone down with their “biggest supporters” considering the EU heavily out-donates them as a whole.
 
Back
Top Bottom