What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

So china wants to meet zelenskie the jew comedian for negotiation with Russia and calls for peace but usa has stopped him for negotiations , once zelenskie the Joo decided to carry on fighting and not come to talks china will provide the Russians the weapons the west has unheard of and will change the course of war

Hey look it's a Russian popsicle. Very cool~ indeed 8-)

& Russian playing catch with a drone. :smitten:
It's funny the Russians and Ukrainians are same people slav, same religion Orthodox Christian same culture but thanks to west they turned them against each other , divide and rule
The west care about Ukrainians dead as much as u do about a Somalian dies of hunger in somalia every day
 
You would think someone in the milfor should be more concerned about military matters instead of engaging in sophistry, no?
Well, that not even sophistry, that's arbitrary argument......You have to have point to argue if it was a false argument.........
 
Do you think if they ever lost their appetite to fight, they wouldn't have lost it last year??


It's already trouble if they still can't take Bakhmut now, the window is closing, and if they can't take Bakhmut at the beginning of April, they won't have time to put defensive position on the line, and with their infantry out of place because of this advance, this is trouble sign for the Russian rear.

The Russian at this point need to think if they want to relief the pressure and defend the counter offensive from Ukraine that they know it's coming or continue to hang troop in the front like they did. and they have about 2 weeks before they need to choose.
In the last year I don't remember they are suffered the casualty in hundred of thousand people
 
They were expected to win both the house and the senate. They only barely control the house. They lost, and badly.

Even states like Georgia which were supposed to be easy wins for republicans ended up going to democrats.

It was a near total loss.

The democrats had the best mid term performance of any party for a very long time.
Expected to win by land slide but they won by small margin

And so ??

Pretty sure if current house map is extrapolated they win the electoral college
 
Expected to win by land slide but they won by small margin

And so ??

Pretty sure if current house map is extrapolated they win the electoral college
That's not how the electoral college works.

The Republicans have a razor thin majority, which they can easily lose. The coming elections, I expect the Republicans to either lose the house again, or retain it and make no notable gains to change the current status quo.

Biden will likely win his second term in office.
 
That's not how the electoral college works.

The Republicans have a razor thin majority, which they can easily lose. The coming elections, I expect the Republicans to either lose the house again, or retain it and make no notable gains to change the current status quo.

Biden will likely win his second term in office.
We will know in 2024 I guess.
Unless republican totally **** up their is no way they will loose
 
We will know in 2024 I guess.
Unless republican totally **** up their is no way they will loose
They have a proven history of fucking up. They've been taken over by extremists and have passed deeply unpopular and even unconstitutional policies.

They're going to lose, but yeah, 2024 is when we'll know who's right.
 
I would have thought that living next to a country that wanted your land on the basis of persecuting minority would made you sympathize with the Ukrainians?

This is not about economic or political issue sahib, This is pure morality. Should we let country just outright annex part of a country or the whole like Russia planned from the beginning. Just because they're in the mood for invading.

So far a lot of dum-dum brown skins from from the globo south & red hats from the north think we should just let Russia annex a country.

Ahh, the 'brown skins'. Starting to show your true colors?? How about showing your flags here?? If you are a continental European and still support this war then you are dumb because you are being sucked into another war where the island nations like America and the UK can burn and watch from a distance.

The internet is full of WHITE Americans who have wised up from what happened during the Iraq War of 2003--a war which was a proven disaster for America. I can share dozens of videos every day from powerful, prominent WHITE Americans who are starting to voice their opposition to this war.

As for annexing Ukraine, I certainly don't want that. But what was so WRONG in early 2022 for Ukraine to commit to neutrality? It wasn't that long ago we were discussing this war on this forum as it was starting? There were concrete demands by Russia and the crux of the demands was neutrality. Maybe join the EU but not NATO. This war was avoidable had Ukraine committed to neutrality. And don't give us the crap about sovereignty: Sixty years ago Cuba too was a sovereign nation with every right to host the Soviet missiles. But we know what happened.

This war, as I said in this forum recently, will be a disaster for Russia. And I believe Putin is the last man who would wage this war in Russia. After this, there would be another Yeltsin or Medvedev. Time would have sorted this out. Putin is already fairly old. But the Ukrainian dumbs fell for the NeoCon agenda with historic consequences for Ukraine.
 
They have a proven history of fucking up. They've been taken over by extremists and have passed deeply unpopular and even unconstitutional policies.

They're going to lose, but yeah, 2024 is when we'll know who's right.
Please name one unconstitutional policy.
 
In the last year I don't remember they are suffered the casualty in hundred of thousand people
lol, sure, this war is exactly 13 months old, you are saying they suffer hundred of thousand of casualty in the last 3 month of this 13 months war??

If anything, the war was more contested in the first 6 month when you have attrition battle like Mariupol, Severodonetsk, Mykolaiv, and Kyiv where both side suffer very high casualty defending and attacking those place, compare of these 3 months of what? Bakhmut??

i really dont know what have you remembered....
 
Please name one unconstitutional policy.
Ahow about the targeting of scientists as a matter of policy by the Republicans in Florida?


Or how about defending the insurrectionists who literally went against the constitution?

The misinterpretation of the 2nd amendment is a pretty big one as well that republicans like to defend.

How about ignoring legally binding subpoena?

Not certifying election results?

Gerrymandering.

Attacking voting rights in red states to make it harder for minorities to vote.

All of these are unconstitutional.

Theres a ton more, but i get the feeling you don't actually care and are gonna try and refute me (and fail, but i don't really care).

Republicans and their supporters are fools.
 
Last edited:

Ukraine war: UK defends sending depleted uranium shells after Putin warning​

A Challenger 2 tank
IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
The UK is sending 14 Challenger 2 tanks to Kyiv to aid Ukrainians in the fight against Russia
By Laura Gozzi
BBC News

President Vladimir Putin has said Russia would be "forced to react" if the UK sent shells made with depleted uranium to Ukraine.
He accused the West of deploying weapons with a "nuclear component".
The UK confirmed it would provide Kyiv the armour-piercing rounds alongside Challenger 2 tanks - but insisted they have a low risk of radiation.
Depleted uranium "is a standard component and has nothing to do with nuclear weapons", the MoD said.
"The British Army has used depleted uranium in its armour piercing shells for decades," the statement added.
"Russia knows this, but is deliberately trying to disinform. Independent research by scientists from groups such as the Royal Society has assessed that any impact to personal health and the environment from the use of depleted uranium munitions is likely to be low."

Former British Army tank commander - and chemical weapons expert - Col Hamish de Breton-Gordon, said Mr Putin's comments were "classic disinformation".
He said depleted uranium rounds used by Challenger 2 tanks contained only trace elements of depleted uranium.
He added it was "laughable" to suggest depleted uranium rounds were in any way linked to nuclear weapons, which uses enriched uranium.
Depleted uranium is what is left over after natural uranium has been enriched, either for weapons-making or for reactor fuel.
It is mildly radioactive in its solid form. But it is a very heavy substance, 1.7 times denser than lead, and it is used to harden rounds so that they can penetrate armour and steel.
When a weapon made with a depleted uranium tip or core strikes a solid object, like the side of a tank, it goes straight through it and then erupts in a burning cloud of vapour.

The vapour settles as dust, which is poisonous and also weakly radioactive.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said sending depleted uranium ammunition to Ukraine would mean the UK was "ready to violate international humanitarian law as in 1999 in Yugoslavia".
"There is no doubt this will end badly for London," Mr Lavrov added.
On Tuesday evening, a spokesman for the Pentagon said the US would not be sending any munitions with depleted uranium to Ukraine.
Shells with depleted uranium were used in Iraq and the Balkans, where some claim it was linked to birth defects.
A 2022 UN Environment Programme (UNEP) report said depleted uranium was an environmental concern in Ukraine.

"Depleted uranium and toxic substances in common explosives can cause skin irritation, kidney failure and increase the risks of cancer," it said.
"The chemical toxicity of depleted uranium is considered a more significant issue than the possible impacts of its radioactivity," it added.

Related Topics​

More on this story​

 
That's not how the electoral college works.

The Republicans have a razor thin majority, which they can easily lose. The coming elections, I expect the Republicans to either lose the house again, or retain it and make no notable gains to change the current status quo.

Biden will likely win his second term in office.
Biden can win? It raises questions about Americans heard mentality!
get some one better he is bit too old for his age. Give him a break.
 
Back
Top Bottom