What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

So why bleat like a goat when the Russians target Ukrainian military in civilian areas?! I mean talk about hypocrisy, you're showing the very same western hypocrisy that on the one hand illegally invades and kills civilians in Iraq, but the accuse the Russians when they do the very same thing!!!
They have double standards, like I said before.
 
A lot of third world country suffered some form of collective brainrot. Just look at this thread. Ukrainians fighting a genocidal war & the brown sahibs / Vatniks can't help themselves making it about them or blaming the victims.
Shut up you racist toad. Using typical racist language while considering you a clean race from "" first world".
Problem is you guys always look world from your own biased eyes and try to impose your double standard ideology on others.
If someone shows you a mirror you get offended.
BTW I already reported your racial language.
 
Last edited:
Shut up you racist toad. Using typical racist language while considering you a clean race from "" first world".
Problem is you guys always look world from your own biased eyes and try to impose your double standard ideology on others.
If someone shows you a mirror you get offended.
BTW I already reported your racial language.
Double standard is an economic term and it exist for a reason. Heck you used it too. By dismissing the Ukrainians plight you are in essence engaging in one.

Also the "ideology being imposed here" is don't engage in a war of conquest. We can all agree that\s a universal value.
 
Double standard is an economic term and it exist for a reason. Heck you used it too. By dismissing the Ukrainians plight you are in essence engaging in one.

Also the "ideology being imposed here" is don't engage in a war of conquest. We can all agree that\s a universal value.
You did not read my earlier comments fully and you tried to assume things on your own.
Where did I said Russia was right? Or Russia was not criminal?
Saying Russia is bad does not make USA good automatically.
Both are just different sides of a single coin when it comes to their crimes against humanity.
It's just Russia is a tad lower because it did not have the might of USA.
USA on the other hand is in lived dozens and dozens of invasions in last 100 years and is involved in wars, political instabilities, genocides (it is still the largest backer of invader Isra-hell who is expanding its illegal occupation and genociding local Palestinians on daily basis), political associations, coups, regime changes and imposing their version of dictating democracy and a lots of others.
I never celebrated Rusaain invasion nor the killing of civilians, not even the killing of common soldiers from both sides. They were just bread earners and became cannon fodders.
I clearly said "AS WAR WAS INEVITABLE (USA needed that to control Russia) I am happy that it wasn't on Muslim lands as usually is the case always.
Ukraine, unfortunately is the new sacrificial goat and test bed for all old/new weapons of Russia, UAS and allies.
 
Last edited:

NATO Official Says Alliance 'Ready' for Direct Confrontation With Russia​

Story by Fatma Khaled • Yesterday 10:44 AM
525251


Rob Bauer, chairman of NATO's Military Committee, recently said that the alliance is "ready" for a direct confrontation with Russia as the country continues to fight in Ukraine.
Above, the Chairman of NATO's Military Committee, Admiral Rob Bauer, gestures while answering a question during a joint press conference on January 20 in Oeiras, Portugal.
Above, the Chairman of NATO's Military Committee, Admiral Rob Bauer, gestures while answering a question during a joint press conference on January 20 in Oeiras, Portugal.© Photo by Horacio Villalobos#Corbis/Corbis via Getty Images
Bauer, an admiral in the Royal Netherlands Navy, told a Portuguese television channel, RTP, that NATO is focused on rearmament as Russian President Vladimir Putin's strategic objectives go beyond Ukraine and could possibly expand to neighboring countries.
The chairman, who is reportedly advocating "peacetime war economy," added that it is important for NATO nations to direct civil industrial production towards military objectives.
However, Chinese military experts warned against NATO's involvement in the war in Ukraine, noting that the "danger of 'another World War' in Europe is increasing," the Global Times, a Chinese state media outlet, reported on Sunday.
Some NATO members, including the United States, recently announced that they will provide Ukraine with tanks to help Ukrainian forces fight Moscow's invasion.
The U.S. is set to send an additional $3.75 billion in military assistance to Ukraine, which includes 50 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicles, bringing the overall security assistance by the U.S. to Ukraine to approximately $27.2 billion since Putin launched his invasion last February.


Loaded: 80.00%


Play
Current Time 0:04
/
Duration 0:52

HQ
Captions
Fullscreen

These NATO Countries Are Sending Tanks To Ukraine: A List
Unmute
0

View on Watch
More videos
"Kiev will always pay efforts to drag its NATO allies to directly fight with Russian troops in Ukraine, as this is probably the only way for Kiev to turn around the current situation. But Washington is not stupid, so it won't be used by Kiev, but will keep using Kiev to undermine Moscow," Song Zhongping, a Chinese military expert and TV commentator, told the Global Times Sunday.
th


Business Loans For Small Business - Information 24/7



Meanwhile, Wei Dongxu, a Beijing-based military expert, told the Chinese media outlet that Ukrainian troops might be able to launch counter offensives in some areas that are currently occupied by the Russians by the end of the winter or shortly afterwards. This could happen if the West supplies Ukraine with F-16 fighter jets, "armed by NATO members," main battle tanks, and long-range missiles.
Last month, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev suggested that members of the NATO military alliance providing Ukraine with assistance could be "legitimate military targets."
Medvedev, who is now the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, questioned whether the delivery of weapons to Ukraine by NATO nations could be considered an attack on Russia.
"Today...the main question is whether the hybrid war de facto declared on our country by NATO can be considered to be the alliance's entry into war with Russia? Is it possible to view the delivery of a large volume of weapons to Ukraine as an attack on Russia?" he said.
Newsweek reached out to the Russian foreign affairs ministry for comment.
Related Articles
 

Attachments

  • 1675139932785.png
    1675139932785.png
    68 bytes · Views: 18
View attachment 914121
If there is information that there is a military target of enough importance present, it is not a war crime to bomb civilians.
Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo then that justifies Russian bombing of Ukrainian targets regardless of the civilian casualties.

You people will even justify rape in war.
 
With Nato occupation of afghanistan, the afghans saw massive increase of life expectancy.

With Russian occupation of afghanistan, the afghans saw a population crash with millions dead.


They are not the same….Nato clearly being the lesser evil in terms of military/social conduct.


I am really suprised so many muslims are happily cheering russia and china on the sidelines.
You do realise that if your country would ever fall under their control sphere and looks at them wrongly they would go all Grozny/Uyghurs on you?
So would any other powerful belligerent enemy-"You do realise that if your country would ever fall under their control sphere and looks at them wrongly they would go all Grozny/Uyghurs on you?"
 
I clearly said "AS WAR WAS INEVITABLE (USA needed that to control Russia) I am happy that it wasn't on Muslim lands as usually is the case always.


Did someone force Putin to invade Ukraine ? Did someone force him to take Crimea in 2014 ?

Even today with all the land the Russian have already taken , they are still not satisfied , and keep sending waves of soldier to die in Bakhmut , just to conquer more parts of Ukraine.

You really cant just close your eyes to the reality on the ground.

Do you think it is a joke for countries like Poland who suffered the horrors of world war 2 to see what is happening in Ukraine and fear they are next inline ? Why do you think the Pols are sending all this weapons to Ukraine ?

Europe remembers too well what happens when you allow a dictator start invading countries..

~
 
Last edited:
Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo then that justifies Russian bombing of Ukrainian targets regardless of the civilian casualties.

You people will even justify rape in war.
Of course they will do if USA and allies are involved.
 
Its about time the ukrainians start an orderly withdrawing from Bakhmut, if they havent already. I somehow doubt that many ukrainians actually defend the city itself anymore.
At some point yes I think Ukraine will withdraw. if defending becomes unsustainable but not yet.

They must hold on as long as possible. Killing as much Russians as possible. If they can get tanks in time.
 
Back
Top Bottom