Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[Beny Karachun]

Do agree due to their huge size and non aerodynamic design but Russia is developing them cheaply if 10 out three hit the target Russia is still happy becoz they don't have to loose their fence T 90 KA 52

You could still develop them cheaply and have way better design and achieve way better results.

200 brand new t-90 tanks delivered to the LPR forces.

Thats just the militia not the Russian army…

To put that into perspective germany has around 230 tanks in its entire army.

Even if this is true, without APS, they would continue to be easily destroyed just like they've been since the start of the war.

1. Because Russian tanks are garbage
2. Because Russian tankers are inexperienced

 

[Muhammed45]

Savagery among Ukrainians

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602585140093411328

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602560451732275200

 

[BHAN85]

Auge um Auge
Zahn um Zahn

The US greenlighting to Ukraine deep strikes on Russia territory.

USA geben offenbar „grünes Licht“: Greift die Ukraine bald vermehrt russisches Territorium an?

Berichten zu Folge hat das Pentagon einen Richtungswechsel eingeschlagen: Die US-Regierung rät Kiew nicht mehr von Angriffen auf Russland ab.

www.tagesspiegel.de

© Bernat Armangue/dpa

​

They give green light to deep inside strikes.
But they dont give them weapons to deep inside stikes.



USA doesnt want a Ukraine victory (neither defeat), USA wants a constant endless war next to Russian border.

America and Eurasia interests are strongly different interests, coldly thought.

 

[That Guy]

The Russian advances in the last five and a half months on the Bakhmut front, the problem of the Russians is that they strike and attack the strongest Ukrainian defenses, while the Ukrainians usually choose the weakest Russian defenses to penetrate them and then force the strong ones to withdraw, in the end the Bakhmut front is confrontational and a real meat grinder for both sides..

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602211753743585280

Funnily enough, even if Bakhmut falls, Russia taking Bakhmut is not a win for the Russian army, it's a win for Wagner.

Even then, it's a pyrrhic victory. The Ukrainians are almost certain to take back that territory. It's just a stupid strategic move by the Russians.

Extreme losses for temporary gains that hold very little strategic value.

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

It's funny you ask for "proofs" when you don't provide any. BTW the lancet missed both LMAO

What you're doing is called a copium. You want to cope with the hammering that the Ukrainian forces are taking on all fronts. Easy with the opium, bro.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602616435959816192

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602582206907555840

One of the consequences of Shaheed-136/Geran-2 drones is it has almost depleted the Ukrainian S-3000 and Buk ammunition.

hhttps://twitter.com/Chronology22/status/1602592371258048512

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602553404307406849

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602621624783699972

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

You could still develop them cheaply and have way better design and achieve way better results.


Even if this is true, without APS, they would continue to be easily destroyed just like they've been since the start of the war.

1. Because Russian tanks are garbage
2. Because Russian tankers are inexperienced

Says by an Israeli who runs to the nearest bomb shelter as soon as he hears the sound of an alarm for an incoming, home-made Palestinian resistance's rocket. Stop acting as a military "analyst" here. You're just spewing a hot air here, buddy.

Now, go and cope with what the Russians are doing in the Donbas meat grinder.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602637860171022339

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602639672404049920

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602636926196006912

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602586749628473344

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602585140093411328

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602560451732275200

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602619406030356482

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602622624525426690

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602624129231998978

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602625490514223107

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

Funnily enough, even if Bakhmut falls, Russia taking Bakhmut is not a win for the Russian army, it's a win for Wagner.

Even then, it's a pyrrhic victory. The Ukrainians are almost certain to take back that territory. It's just a stupid strategic move by the Russians.

Extreme losses for temporary gains that hold very little strategic value.

Part of the goal of the Russian side in Bakhmut has been to inflict unbearable casualties on the most trained and equipped Ukrainian forces. This was a grinding war and the Russians seem to be almost there in achieving that goal.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602322510871150593

 

[Vergennes]

Part of the goal of the Russian side in Bakhmut has been to inflict unbearable casualties on the most trained and equipped Ukrainian forces. This was a grinding war and the Russians seem to be almost there in achieving that goal.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602322510871150593

Because the Russians aren't suffering massive casualties in their waves attacks ?

Says by an Israeli who runs to the nearest bomb shelter as soon as he hears the sound of an alarm for an incoming, home-made Palestinian resistance's rocket. Stop acting as a military "analyst" here. You're just spewing a hot air here, buddy.

Now, go and cope with what the Russians are doing in the Donbas meat grinder.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602637860171022339

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602639672404049920

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602636926196006912

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602586749628473344

Are you again aware the Russians are claiming to have destroyed more MLRS than delivered to Kyiv, of course without providing any kind of evidence of any destroyed.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602612289076609025

https://twitter.com/PaulJawin/status/1602597969139826689?s=20&t=kl2ESlmGTWXBcHqyCXr2AA

https://twitter.com/PaulJawin/status/1602587767426682881?s=20&t=kl2ESlmGTWXBcHqyCXr2AA

https://twitter.com/PaulJawin/status/1602580722786701312?s=20&t=kl2ESlmGTWXBcHqyCXr2AA

 

[That Guy]

Part of the goal of the Russian side in Bakhmut has been to inflict unbearable casualties on the most trained and equipped Ukrainian forces. This was a grinding war and the Russians seem to be almost there in achieving that goal.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602322510871150593

Bro, the narrative from the Russian side has changed on what their goal is in Bakhmut from the beginning.

It's a Wagner pet project to legitimize their leader as a potential successor to Putin, or at the very least put him in a position where he basically control's Russia's security services.

 

[The SC]

Funnily enough, even if Bakhmut falls, Russia taking Bakhmut is not a win for the Russian army, it's a win for Wagner.

Even then, it's a pyrrhic victory. The Ukrainians are almost certain to take back that territory. It's just a stupid strategic move by the Russians.

Extreme losses for temporary gains that hold very little strategic value.

Ukrainian steadfastness in Bakhmut conflicts with Russian political interests, but is compatible with military interests. These Ukrainian steadfasts constitute fuel for the Russian crematorium, especially since most of them are from the Ukrainian elite, nationalists, and from the Foreign Legion. Bakhmut has become an impenetrable protective wall, but if it collapses, the Ukrainian defenses will collapse like dominoes, because The Russians focus their fire on this impregnable line and on the elected support, reserve and offensive capabilities behind it..

 

[Vergennes]

Ukrainian steadfastness in Bakhmut conflicts with Russian political interests, but is compatible with military interests. These Ukrainian steadfasts constitute fuel for the Russian crematorium, especially since most of them are from the Ukrainian elite, nationalists, and from the Foreign Legion. Bakhmut has become an impenetrable protective wall, but if it collapses, the Ukrainian defenses will collapse like dominoes, because The Russians focus their fire on this impregnable line and on the elected support, reserve and offensive capabilities behind it..

Are you aware that actually Bakhmut represents no strategic objective since the Russian threat to Kramatorsk and Sloviansk has been nullified after the Ukrainian offensives on Izyum/Kupiansk and Lyman that the capture of Bakhmut would only destroy the prestige of the Russian armed forces (an elite institution in Russia) if a group of mercenaries composed of the lowest of the low of the Russian society would present the first "Russian victory" since the fall of Lysychansk and Severodonetsk and could only be the ones assuring Russia some kind of victories ?

The only thing happening is the Russians getting outflanked in the north in the so called "Luhansk republic" while the Russians are throwing majority of their forces on Bakhmut and suffering horrible losses in wave frontal attacks.

A victory in Bakhmut would only serve the interests of the Prigojine and nothing else.

 

[Beny Karachun]

Says by an Israeli who runs to the nearest bomb shelter as soon as he hears the sound of an alarm for an incoming, home-made Palestinian resistance's rocket. Stop acting as a military "analyst" here. You're just spewing a hot air here, buddy.

Now, go and cope with what the Russians are doing in the Donbas meat grinder.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602637860171022339

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602639672404049920

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602636926196006912

https://twitter.com/x/status/1602586749628473344

Russian soldiers in the trenches probably wish for a system that alarms them when HIMARS rains down on them lol, and wish even more for a system like the Iron Dome to intercept them.

 

[ZeGerman]

Ukrainian steadfastness in Bakhmut conflicts with Russian political interests, but is compatible with military interests. These Ukrainian steadfasts constitute fuel for the Russian crematorium, especially since most of them are from the Ukrainian elite, nationalists, and from the Foreign Legion. Bakhmut has become an impenetrable protective wall, but if it collapses, the Ukrainian defenses will collapse like dominoes, because The Russians focus their fire on this impregnable line and on the elected support, reserve and offensive capabilities behind it..

Every time russia wins a grinding victory over some heavily contested village/minor city we hear the same bullshit.

How the fall of x (severodonetsk) will lead to all other defenses falling like dominoes/being completely uncontested and surely victory is near comrade.

Surely your not that stupid to believe the same now. Ukraine has large formations elsewhere, in heavily prepped defenses.

Larger cities are far far far away for the russians who can barely muster any offensive anymore (bakhmut is taking months).

russia poured troops from Kherson to Bakhmut. The question is…where is ukraine sending its troops (formerly tied in kherson province).

Himars attack pattern indicate softening up somewhere else.