100,000 Russian casualties? This cat believes in his (or her) own nonsense. They didn't even lose 40,000 (dead and wounded). But the cannon fodder Ukrainians lost over 100,000 men and their wounded is at least twice or 3 thrice of that. Besides, while Russia is fighting on the ground in Donbas and Southern Ukraine, the whole EU (UK included) is suffocating through financial and energy crises. So it is whole EU that is suffocating.
The whole godless West is a project run by a few hook-nosed Zionists who drive them like a fickle. They put them from one conflict to the next in order to secure their financial dominance, and their sheeple like this mindless cat start hating on countries that have done them no harm.
You clearly have issues that go beyond the conflict. If you are going to vent on the zionist, than start venting also on UAE and the rest of the countries cosying up to Israel and kissing up to them.
As for the stats: you are giving dillusional numbers much like Putin's own advisers gave him when they went in.
And it doesn't suit your credibility to think that Ukrainians are brainless morons that are easily manipulated by NATO to do NATO's calling. I haven't had to have my country fight an invading army but I would imagine if i did, I would react the same way as Ukraine. Countries (Vietnam, Afghanistan) all fight for what they believe in. Next you will be posting that Afghans Mujahideens were cannon fodder, brainless mindless and had no emotion or courage on their own.
Remember nobody counted on Ukraine to do anything other than be a defensive force: thats why they were equipped with defensive weapons so they could inflict as much damage if it became a gurellia war. They used those weapons in the first 60 days to put Russians back and then got offensive weapons.
So sadly, I can see your frustration that this turned out to be EXACTLY the opposite of what Russia wanted: bring NATO together, bring US closer to NATO, show its weapons are inferior, and NATO's doctrine and weapons to be superior, while losing its citizens that fled the country, and exposed that Russia has minimal friends and has no ability to take over a former satellite. Whoever thought that an attacking country's citizens will flea the country.
They became refugees as invaders for the first time in history. Thats what Putin has accomplished
every buyer of patriots loses wars - Saudi Arabia, Israel, now Ukraine, its just a bad omen, the ar will be determined by the ground force strength - if Ukraine cant continue to supply good competent ground forces to hold all this area and fend off Russia, then Ukraine loses the war for sure.
Care to comment on how Israel loses every war? I am not a fan of Israel's policies and how it humiliates and worse how it gets exempted from punitive action because of how their religion was treated 80 years ago.
But that aside, Israel moves at its will over Syria and targets whatever it feels without a single S-300 being launched. It still holds Golan. And for every Hamas rocket lands on it, it retaliates by by destroying a city block in Gaza. Which of these is your definition of bad omen? Or the fact that Russia abandoned its most recent location recently in Kherson? And they don't even have Patriots yet.
UAE has had good success outside of shooting the targets outside of Abu Dhabi