Protesters assault Sanjay Leela Bhansali at ‘Padmavati’ set

[Tea addict]

It doesn't matter what percentage of the population, anyone should be able to express whatever they want, even if 99.99999% of the population disagrees with it.

Some people think rape is natural, if that's what one believes, that person should be able to express that without hindrance, interference and the threats of persecution.

Seeing you example, you need some counselling.
You know why there are blasphemy law in Pakistan? Or why there are laws which prohibits individual from going to an extent where their expression can suppress the fundamental right of religion and fundamental right of expression of others?.. your rights end where other people's rights starts, you can't suppress other persons rights by your rights..so this guy is targeting a symbol of my culture, my community, which is only 2℅ of indian population and he should be allowed to do that in the name of right to expression while he violates my Right to religious beliefs?
(We rajput worship our ancestors).

 

[schoolboy]

Free does not mean you make a movie were a womans Rapist becomes her lover... History should not be manipulated.

This is not history. This is a commercial film, not a history text book. Are you the type who learns history through bollywood movies?

He was never able to rape her..she committed jauhar before he can ever touch her.

And you know this because you had a spider-cam giving you a live-feed of the events, eh?

I don't mind some degree of romanticization of historical events and the weaving of myths - Moses' parting of the waters, Christ's miracles, the battle of karbala, ramayana, etc. But it's a problem when people start taking these too seriously.

 

[supun1]

Seeing you example, you need some counselling.
You know why there are blasphemy law in Pakistan? Or why there are laws which prohibits individual from going to an extent where their expression can suppress the fundamental right of religion and fundamental right of expression of others?.. your rights end where other people's rights starts, you can't suppress other persons rights by your rights..so this guy is targeting a symbol of my culture, my community, which is only 2℅ of indian population and he should be allowed to do that in the name of right to expression while he violates my Right to religious beliefs?
(We rajput worship our ancestors).

You have no right to suppress someone's freedom of expression because a certain fact disagrees with your culture/religion.

 

[Tea addict]

This is not history. This is a commercial film, not a history text book. Are you the type who learns history through bollywood movies?



And you know this because you had a spider-cam giving you a live-feed of the events, eh?

I don't mind some degree of romanticization of historical events and the weaving of myths - Moses' parting of the waters, Christ's miracles, the battle of karbala, ramayana, etc. But it's a problem when people start taking these too seriously.

I know because i have visited chittorgarh fort myself and there is a historical proof "padmavat" .... you people read history,we rajputs create history..so please spare me your school boy rhetorics.

 

[supun1]

I know because i have visited chittorgarh fort myself and there is a historical proof "padmavat" .... you people read history,we rajputs create history..so please spare me your school boy rhetorics.

It's not about what you believe to be true, but the rights of others to express what they believe to be true.

 

[livingdead]

You have no right to suppress someone's freedom of expression because a certain fact disagrees with your culture/religion.

police cant be everywhere to protect your freedom of your expression.. mind you, he has not been charged of any wrongdoing, so his freedom remains.

 

[Tea addict]

You have no right to suppress someone's freedom of expression because a certain fact disagrees with your culture/religion.

Where did we suppressed his right to free expression? We just said he can't violate our right to religion..both are fundamental rights..he can exercise his freedom of expression if he shows true history..not fiction in name of history.

It's not about what you believe to be true, but the rights of others to express what they believe to be true.

History is true, if its written and preserved..and no freedom of expression can alter the history as it violates the freedom of expression of others and freedom of religion too.

 

[supun1]

Where did we suppressed his right to free expression? We just said he can't violate our right to religion..both are fundamental rights..he can exercise his freedom of expression if he shows true history..not fiction in name of history.

He believes your religion and culture is fiction, so you're the one expressing falsity. What do you say now?

Where did we suppressed his right to free expression? We just said he can't violate our right to religion..both are fundamental rights..he can exercise his freedom of expression if he shows true history..not fiction in name of history.


History is true, if its written and preserved..and no freedom of expression can alter the history as it violates the freedom of expression of others and freedom of religion too.

Your history is false, and made of lies.

 

[Tea addict]

He believes your religion and culture is fiction, so you're the one expressing falsity. What do you say now?

We have proof in our forts and written history by our enemies and us too...so ours aint no fiction..

He believes your religion and culture is fiction, so you're the one expressing falsity. What do you say now?


Your history is false, and made of lies.

Seeing yoir example, i knew you had some mental issues..go whine all you want..

 

[Tea addict]

Rape is a natural part of the natural selective forces that make up everyone, why should it be outlawed now? it's been in work for 1000s of years, and it should continue.

@waz @The Eagle look at the quality of posts of this poster.

They are are all lies, you have no proof, they are lying, they are long dead, so they can't be cross-examined so how do we know they are telling the truth?

.

You can't counter my facts with facts and now will just claim they are lie..man you really have some issues.

 

[supun1]

@waz @The Eagle look at the quality of posts of this poster.

You're a joke, and so is your country.

 

[The Eagle]

Decorum be maintained and avoid inappropriate/offensive posting. Rather than quoting the Mod, report the such posts if any and move on without quoting the same as well.

Thanks.

 

[schoolboy]

I know because i have visited chittorgarh fort myself and there is a historical proof "padmavat" .... you people read history,we rajputs create history..so please spare me your school boy rhetorics.

Are you a mystic? A time traveller? You "know" facts that are hundreds of years old by looking at old buildings? Maybe I should contract your services to know more about my grandparents.

Truth is - you know no more about Padmavati by visiting Chittogarh than I know about Abraham Lincoln by visiting the White House. So stop with the sanctimonious preach.

 

[Tea addict]

Are you a mystic? A time traveller? You "know" facts that are hundreds of years old by looking at old buildings? Maybe I should contract your services to know more about my grandparents.

Truth is - you know no more about Padmavati by visiting Chittogarh than I know about Abraham Lincoln by visiting the White House. So stop with the sanctimonious preach.

The thing is mr school boy you learn history from books..we learn history from books, our folk songs and inscriptions which are written by our enemies as well..padmavat is also written by rajput's enemy..so go read history which was created by my ancestors

 

[supun1]

The thing is mr school boy you learn history from books..we learn history from books, our folk songs and inscriptions which are written by our enemies as well..padmavat is also written by rajput's enemy..so go read history which was created by my ancestors

It's funny to see a moron like you put a quote, from Bhagat Singh in your signature.