Well JF-17 is a good fighter,PAF will anyways use them as point defence with offence left to F-16s and I have no doubt Pak can defend itself very well,I fully agree with you on this point,but come on 71 a moral victory for PAK?Pakistan chose not to do inhumane act ? of WHAT?
Lets recall what happened in 71.
Mujeeb won election but Mujeeb wasnt allowed to be prime minister
,Bangladeshis revolted and Pakistan Army started a Massacre in Dhaka.Millions fled to India as a result of which Indira Gandhi ordered army to help mukti bahini.Indian army conducted Blitzkrieg style operations in Dhaka,in response
Air-strike on western front of India by Pakistan.India retaliated by attacking Karachi,and denied air superiority to PAF on Indian skies.
USA sent Enterprise as a warning to India and as a result USSR sent a nuclear submarine.Before the Enterprise could sail in Niazi surrendered with 90000 POW.They had no other option,it was a defeat not a stalemate.I dont know what moral victory are you talking about.
Let me open your mind.
India conspired with mujieb the traiter 5 years prior to the election in Pakistan and started training Mukti buhini.
Pakistan army had to go after traiter whio were suporting Mukiti Buhini traiters working for India and Mujeeb from universities and colleges to spread disinformation and guidng traiters from Universites by communications equipment setsprovided by India, to destroy those who being in Pakistan were tools of India.
Unlike India, which continue to kill innnocent kashmiris now for more than 60 years. What a SHAME.
90,00 POWS was a wise dicision given the choices of fighting to death and in doing so killING lots of people or to be pows and fight another day in the arena where there will be no traiters to back stab you.
U.S. talked about proving assistance on the other hand India got Amphibious vehicles to cross all the water ways and radar jammers including all other equipment from russia, that Pakistan did not have, and to fight in a enemy territory run by traiters and thugs was a loosing proposition, so it was wise to be POWS and than to fight interfering Indians and traiters suported by India.
Now all the big powers have had their pows aas well so this is not unique to Pakistan, but it was wise.
I was dispicable to attack karachi, as Navies were never involved in the fight, but than India does this all the time.
Let me give u the details of POWS IN thise world, it is not unique to Pakstan.dude.
Remeber atlantic plane flying in Pakistani territory under the pact between two countries about these flights, India being the way it is did not care about the pact and shot the plane in pak. territory there by killing all innocent human beings.
In fact India got on the scene and stole parts to take it to Indian side and lie to the world about it being in indian teritory. right now it looks like a plan killing of innocent and stealing the parts to fool the wolrd for it being in Indian territory. What a shame.
Take a lok at the list of POWS IN wars. it only talks about ww2 and not neoplionic or other wars.
Prisoner of war - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia