Again, it is not about 'killing Muslims' or 'killing Pakistanis' or 'Killing Americans', it is about going to war against those who would kill, maim and threaten innocents.
Nonetheless, that the US is a democracy does not automatically mean that its actions are infallible, nor does it mean that when it goes to war those wars are just, and not just a means to further national interests.
A large part of the Muslim world views US foreign policies as being morally bankrupt It sees the wars of the last decade as unjust, and in Pakistan especially, the US campaign in Afghanistan is seen as propping up warlords and criminals, inflicting tremendous casualties on civilians and an attempt to undermine Pakistan while building up India.
I think those views about US policies need to be taken into account when trying to understand why some people have been critical of LT Naqvi. A very loose analogy would be trying to expect non-Germans to have sympathy for Nazi officers, or those who collaborated with the Nazi's, under orders perhaps from their governments.
I am not suggesting that US policies come anywhere close to the Nazi's, but I do think that one needs to look beyond the position that US policies and actions are axiomatically true - they are viewed as quite the opposite by a large number of people in the world, and not just Muslims.
