Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No I meant something else. Let me clarify.
- AZM is indeed an umbrella program I am specifically talking about the NGF
-Within NGF there is an in-house design (or designs)
-It is also understood that there was supposed to be collaboration even on making the in-house design develop into a system
-TFX collaboration is more of a fallback plan if the in-house design is found to be a not workable path
So locking the original “NGF” thread and continuing the discussion on the subject in the paradigm of TFX collaboration means that’s the way forward now and that the in-house design (with collaboration) is an abandoned route in PDF’s view?
It’s just that the fate of the below is unclear now. And it could not have been TFX as the timelines don’t match. Clearly a design other than TFX was initiated somewhere in early 2017:An in-house design may still require the help and what if it was about TFX program in collaboration. Secondly, it doesn't mean that the design is abandoned. May be TFX is exactly what PAF needs or requires. One can relate this to PAC JV with China on Thunder. A fighter aircraft that serves the purpose is not fallback except the notion and emotions such as I couldn't built one alone. There are always JVs and this is the way forward. Lastly, who says anything that PAF will stop at TFX only. AZM thread is locked so that we will be posting threads subject wise under AZM. Wait for a while and soon you will understand.
i typed up all lot and then deleted it again due to OPSEC reasons ....It was always going to be a collaboration to turn it into an actual flying fighter aircraft system. That collaboration would have been for subsystems and technical assistance to achieve what was being designed as below. I am talking about this:
MODP Year Book 2017-18
DIRECTORATE GENERAL MUNITIONS PRODUCTION (DGMP) PROCUREMENT OF MAJOR DEFENCE EQUIPMENTdefence.pk
View attachment 817600
Let’s wait and see what comes out of it. I would have loved for F23 to have finally come to fruition but again fate seems to be favoring F22i typed up all lot and then deleted it again due to OPSEC reasons ....
Pakistan - Turkey - China have various MoUs / agreements in all tri services .... experienced engineers were recruited through DSSC at the rank to that of eqv to Major / Lt.Col in army who are now focused on R&D.....
from Frigates to Cyber Security , Azm to Drones we are working across the board with everyone.....Setting up labs, tests, research, project development .... to name a few
It’s just that the fate of the below is unclear now. And it could not have been TFX as the timelines don’t match. Clearly a design other than TFX was initiated somewhere in early 2017:
View attachment 817607
MODP Year Book 2017-18
DIRECTORATE GENERAL MUNITIONS PRODUCTION (DGMP) PROCUREMENT OF MAJOR DEFENCE EQUIPMENTdefence.pk
So when will the PAF be flying the TFX, somewhere around 2025?
Not before 2035, if at all.So when will the PAF be flying the TFX, somewhere around 2025?
I would like to emphasize again. I didn’t expect or mean in my post “a Pakistani design alone and alone being built.”Man...... who knows? A lot is being done behind closed doors. One can only imagine as what's being declared publicly. As far as I can understand, you were actually expecting a Pakistani design alone and alone being built. However, the keyword is always collaboration. You can call it TFX or NGF for PAF and TFX for TuAF both at a time. The highlighted part says the first cycle of conceptual design phase. Not even the design itself but first phase of a conceptual design followed by 3 more conceptual design to reach at final conceptual design and then so on and on. Not everything can be said or told by officials and I understand that. Exchange programs are actively being done and so the concern students or professionals are sent into other offices/entities to take part into R&D programs. Then after, they will have to look into future projects & so the collaboration. You don't just reinvent the wheel by your own at home.
Surprised by the date you mentioned. Is it coming from a source you might have seen? Please share in details.
Pakistan can invest money, promise to buy a more strike-oriented version of the TFX. Pakistan can have workshare agreements. Don't expect Pakistan to actively contribute to major design.@Bilal Khan (Quwa) @JamD , what can be Pakistan's role in this programme?