LA se Karachi
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
- Messages
- 1,672
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
After the war crimes tribunal sentenced JI leaders to death, Pakistan politicians went about turning international opinion against Bangladesh government for "state sponsored executions". They passed resolutions condemning the verdicts and tried to turn Muslim countries against us. Even had its ally Turkey pull out its ambassador from our country. Why did Pakistan have to interfere in our internal matters?
We were honouring the tripartite agreement of 1974 according to which BD would not try Pakistan military officers who were complicit in 71 massacres. But BD was completely withing its right to try its own citizens. Interference by Pakistan and repeated statements condemning BD irked Awami League leaders. Relations with Pakistan were quite warm even during Awami's 1st term. It was Pakistan interference which provoked leaders to make such statements singling out Pakistan for state-sponsored terrorism. Its tit for tat
Okay given explanation now. Case closed
Criticizing the war tribunals is not the same thing as accusing a country of state-sponsored terrorism. What an absurd comparison. You went off on a tangent that has little to do with my post.
Secondly, I don't care what Bangladesh thinks about Pakistan. You twisted the words of my previous post. I was only stating that this minister represents the views of the Bangladeshi government (unless the government disavows what he said), and that Pakistan should cut off diplomatic relations if so.