Pakistan’s China Syndrome

[Saifullah Sani]

you Indians
Pak China Friendship is on the sky

 

[fd24]

I am not interested in Indians insecurity with who we have relations with. All i am aware of is the fact that whenever the going gets tough then China has show a real solidarity and stuck with us through thick and thin. I believe India would benefit in having better relations with ANY of its neighbours.
Long live China and Pakistan friendship and may it prosper forever!

 

[Dalai Lama]

They can replace around most of the obsolete AC's of PAF. They are feasible economically, militarily and without no strings attached. I won't be surprised if you still don't get the "help" part.

All this can still mean arming the enemy of my enemy, no?

By the way as we were talking about 71 I guess. I don't know from where JFT came in between.

Ask your mod.

 

[lem34]

Then why was there n help in 65 71 and 99

why not add 1962 to that list eh?

---------- Post added at 12:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:51 PM ----------

All this can still mean arming the enemy of my enemy, no?



Ask your mod.

You accept by coming on pdf that mods are yours as well ok?

 

[Dalai Lama]

why not add 1962 to that list eh?

Because Pakistan had jacksh*t to do with '62.

 

[Areesh]

All this can still mean arming the enemy of my enemy, no?

Then why were you asking for "help" in 99? Wasn't that would be something "arming the enemy of my country". Facepalm.

Anyways we consider that as help, you can take it as "arming the enemy of my country" since Pak-China is a bogey for you guys.

 

[Dalai Lama]

Then why were you asking for "help" in 99? Wasn't that would be something "arming the enemy of my country". Facepalm.

It would have been a "friend" "helping" a friend when said "friend" needed it. This is peacetime, so them gifting you a few toys isn't the same. Had they done this during any of the wars then the case would have been different.

 

[fd24]

All this can still mean arming the enemy of my enemy, no?



Ask your mod.

Why does it have to be "your mod"? Are you insinuating mods are unfair? Are they treating me and you differently? Unfortunate that you believe the mods are not a representative body of all to "moderate".
Obviously there is anguish whenever the China - Pakistan relationship is discussed by Indians. The relationship is stronger than ever and is thriving. If it burns you guys then that's a matter for you.

 

[Areesh]

It would have been a "friend" "helping" a friend when said "friend" needed it.

If they do it during 71. It isn't help but "arming my enemy's enemy" and if it would have done it during 99 it would have been "help" not "arming enemy's enemy".. Pathetic.

Again facepalm.

 

[westtowel]

Pak China Friendship is on the sky

China on front.pak on back.

 

[lem34]

It would have been a "friend" "helping" a friend when said "friend" needed it. This is peacetime, so them gifting you a few toys isn't the same. Had they done this during any of the wars then the case would have been different.

in 99 they sent weapons to help pakistan. Gen V P Malik, who headed the force during the 1999 Kargil crisis, also brought in a new angle in his just-published book 'Kargil - from surprise to victory' that China made a "demonstrative support" to Pakistan at the height of the conflict that its forces almost sparked off a stand-off on the Sino-Indian border in Arunachal Pradesh

---------- Post added at 01:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:00 PM ----------

Because Pakistan had jacksh*t to do with '62.

but I think you got your incredible bottoms kicked and you have amnesia now/

 

[cyphercide]

If they do it during 71. It isn't help but "arming my enemy's enemy" and if it would have done it during 99 it would have been "help" not "arming enemy's enemy".. Pathetic.

Again facepalm.

Does it make a difference? In either case of war,they never transferred tech that would tilt the war in Pakistan's favor now did they?

 

[Dalai Lama]

If they do it during 71. It isn't help but "arming my enemy's enemy" and if it would have done it during 99 it would have been "help" not "arming enemy's enemy".. Pathetic.

Again facepalm.

If they gave you toys in either of the wars it would have been help.

---------- Post added at 01:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:04 PM ----------

but I think you got your incredible bottoms kicked and you have amnesia now/

I shouldn't laugh. Basking in China's victory is the closest you've come to it I suppose.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

The article has some factual errors

1965 Indo-Pak conflict is where Chinese vociferously supported Pakistan , though Pakistan's leader at that time , a anti-Communist chap , turned down Chinese offers of help.

 

[khanz4996]

If they gave you toys in either of the wars it would have been help.

---------- Post added at 01:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:04 PM ----------



I shouldn't laugh. Basking in China's victory is the closest you've come to victory I suppose.

lol we should post some pictures of pakistani flag flying high on rajistan fort in 1965 and video of air attack on the indian airfields destroying their airforce strike force on the ground.what else do u call humilation?