Avicenna
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2016
- Messages
- 5,795
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
You don't need a missile to train for BVR. Already pointed it out. And the PAF F-16s could easily simulate BVR kills.
Also, when two air forces are facing each other without a common missile in their inventory, a fictional missile is simulated. The IAF simulates MICA with the French and a fictional missile with the Americans. So technically, IAF and USAF also do not have the Aim-120 during exercises, but still train for BVR.
The 90s wasn't good for us either.
Let's just say it was the highlight of his career to date.
Dunno how an F-14 article helps the chances of the F-21 here.
Again, PAF was hobbled by sanctions. (IAF was not.)
I can't quantify it, however, I would think that would have some effect on training etc. etc.
Resulting in degradation of capability.
Fast forward to 2019, you had the introduction of the Block 52, release of additonal Block 15OCU and subsequent MLU and 500 AMRAAMS.
Not to mention a successful JF-17 program with SD-10.
In addition to the better hardware, you likely had improved training in regards to the BVR sphere to effectively utilize the new hardware.
I remember following PAF as closely as possible for a layman in the states during the 90's and was genuinely concerned given all the limitations in place at the time. (US sanctions affecting F-16 fleet, uncertainty regarding availability of RD-93 for JF-17, etc...)
Just saying the limitations of those days may have affected performance.
Last edited: