RIP Captain!!
What you sow is what you reap.
So I guess India sowed seeds of oppression in Kashmir and got what she reaped, 5 soldiers dead
I am not part of other forums so lets not talk about them.
The biggest part is not deleting..but such posts being posted.
Soldiers should not be abused....but due to Kashmit thing a lot of Pakistanis celebrate even when a lot of Pakistani soldierss die in Balochistan.
One mans terrorist is another freedom fighter applies to every issue.
Itd be a shame to see you in a pink sari. Grow up. Here is what @
Awesome has to say for this comment
Of late we've been hitting ideological debating road blocks between Indians and Pakistanis about the issue that stems from the use of the word terrorists for Kashmiri Separatists" or the use of the word terrorists for the Indian Army.
To move the debates forward, we're enforcing the use of the term "Kashmiri separatists" and enforcing ALL uniformed armies be given their due respect as soldiers.
The debates on this forum would never move forward without this and every debate would come to a stand still.
A few explanations to the arguments we've heard:
1) Why can Pakistani Taliban be called terrorists and not Kashmiri Separatists?
The UN recognizes Kashmir as a disputed territory. Hence all the fighting on this disputed territory becomes legitimate. The simple notion is, whoever controls as much territory by whatever means - that's theirs till someone else forces a change.
Kashmiri Separatists, by mission target the Indian Army and Indian Army targets the Kashmiri Separatists. That by definition makes them Enemy Combatants not terrorists. Discounting collateral damage of course as intent is almost impossible to prove or disprove.
The Taliban are fighting and bombing Pakistani citizens and on Pakistani land, the UN recognizes Pakistani government as the ultimate authority on all places Pakistan. For the UN there is no disputed territory within Pakistani borders.
The Taliban have targeted and killed civilians in the thousands and that by definition makes them terrorists.
2) Why not allow the freedom to choose whatever term is preferred?
We can't allow the freedom to use any term as the user wants to, as we censor and prohibit a lot of offensive terms that others might want to use for the uniformed armies. Some may be okay with it, but the quality of this forum demands that soldiers not be described with any obscene expletives.
The terms that must be followed:
1. Kashmiri Separatists, for all separatist groups in Jammu and Kashmir
2. Soldiers, for all uniformed armies
Our proposed solution utilizes neutral terms to make it acceptable for all parties to continue on with the debate and remove the focus from the name calling. This is in no means an enforcement of a point of view, you're free to criticize/support a political point of view. Focus should be on the debate of issues, not on mocking/point scoring.
Compliance is mandatory.
