What's new

PAF J-10C News, Updates and Discussion

. . . . .
Brother look closely at video and you will know why I said so.
I honestly tried and couldn't make it out. Anyways InshAllah they will come

It is common sense

Why do you think 40 years old mirages would come from China and that too with escorts?
Looool what's wrong with you. How can you tell they came from China... that's the common sense bit????
 
. . .
Just imagine, paf operating 6 squadrons of j10cp armed with pl15 supported by 10 aewcs and layered air defence. Just imagine

This free up 2 squadrons of rose 5 mirage 5, 10 squadrons of JFT and 4 squadrons of falcon to totally disscimate Indian army, navy and air force
6 squadrons are a far cry for the PAF under so much fiscal pressure. JF-17 production should also be maintained. But would love to see those numbers. It would transform PAF into a purely 4/4++ Gen air force. But by that time project Azm should also be in its final stages. Don't know if PAF would be able to fund them simultaneously!
 
.
Why do you want to know the information that would certainly be kept secret? Do you think it is a good idea to flout SOPs & post full specs of all the equipment to make it easy for adversaries to find ways & means to undermine them?

There is a point beyond which lusting after more information becomes counter-productive, even harmful for a country's security. Do you think it is a wise idea to prioritize information above even security?

I am automatically suspicious of anyone who asks too many probing questions about equipment without a stated or established purpose. Its just not a good idea to spill beans for the sake of appearing knowledgeable & some young people have done that in the past on this & other forums.

And yes, I did read all your posts on the subject. I still did not think it was a good idea to look for information that would compromise security. Once a grainy picture of J-10C with its radar dome exposed was shared, it was established with reasonable certainty that J-10C's radar is AESA. It was just bad form to keep questioning whether J-10C has an AESA radar or not; & try to find out its specification, even though it is automatically understood that no one would actually provide credible information about it unless manufacturer is allowed to do so.
No one is doubting about J-10's AESA radar. And it's a lame excuse for being ignorant with no basis whatsoever. The name of an equipment and it's basic stats doesn't give away any critical info that you are implying to.

The whole world know that JF-17 Thunder's name is JF-17 Thunder, it has 7 hard points now a chin mounted hard point is added. It has 3 blocks and single/dual seater versions. Can pull this many G's and have this range. It houses variants KLJ-7 radars, Link 17 data link, Aselpod integrated, block 3 would be fully FBW, helmet mounted sights, better EW suite, most probably changes in the cockpit etc etc. Now tell me what info you got from which you would devise a plan to counter it! Nothing but illogical rants
 
. . .
Why do you want to know the information that would certainly be kept secret? Do you think it is a good idea to flout SOPs & post full specs of all the equipment to make it easy for adversaries to find ways & means to undermine them?
I am not against security, I am for it. But the stuff I was asking for does not compromise any security. You obvioulsy HAVEN'T read my posts if you think otherwise.
And yes, I did read all your posts on the subject.
You obviously didn't understand them then and need to go and read them again.
However, since I don't want to keep belabouring the same point, I'm going to leave it at that.

The J-10C's have reportedly landed, so just relax & enjoy the moment.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom