Whatever jargon you're posting, the point in terms of war casualties is simple. Armored ambulance would be at middle or rear lines escorting battalions into warzone ready to save any wounded and ferry to safety while treating or stopping wounds. Choppers will be used when the area is clear for landing.
lol. With these 2 post, it only show how you don't understand Casualty Evacuation works..
First of all, Helicopter does not need a secure patch to do evacuation, that's where CSAR and TRAP is for.
Modern Medicine dictate that if a wounded is losing blood and the wound cannot be closed (T-1), That mean whatever you do in the field would not help the patient, that patient will then need to be transport to a fully equipped combat hospital within 1 hour time. That's when you would lose almost all your blood before your lose consciousness.
There are only 4 Classification on casualty ever used to categorize/tirage the patient.
T-1 Emergency, Life Threatening Injury (Bleeding, Open Wound)
T-2 Emergency, Non-Life Threatening Injury (Not Bleeding Closed Wounded)
T-3 Non-Emergency, Litter Patient (Walking Wounded)
T-4 Expectant (Dead/Beyond Helping)
In today world, unless you don't care if your patient are going to bled to death, Ground Transport are reserved for T-2/T-3/T-4 only, because you would have 2-6 hours limit to transport your patient before they, bled to death. T-1 have around 45 minutes to 1 hour before they are bled to death. So, unless your armoured ambulance can fly, or you litter your combat hospital every 50KM, by the time your T-1 Patient safely and comfortable arrived to your hospital, he would have been bled out and died already.
For T-2/T-3/T-4, where time is not a factor here, then you could simply exfil them with any and every way you can, thus rendering the whole Armoured Ambulance concept redundant.
If your country thinks its military already so advanced assuming all upcoming war where enemy forces are far inferior until there's no need for war ambulance is up to you.
It's not because we think we are advance, but this is because we care about our patient, any country that care about their patient would have use dustoff, it's like saying you can use broadband internet but you still prefer 56k dial up.
Please tell your leaders not to imposed arms embargo on countries that they attack next time. Several countries need to make money by selling them weapons and supplies. Since America assumed Russian, Chinese weapons are inferior, why starve the targeted country without giving it fair fight to fend for itself?
Again, you are talking crap. Do you know from Vietnam war onward, which when American start extensively use of helicopter, all of the American enemies since then are basically master in ground/air defence
Vietnam and Iraq both have state of the arts Anti-Air radar and SAM system, Yugoslavia were basically Russian playground and littered with Russian made advance SAM. And Afghanistan AA system are trained and equipped with none other than the CIA themselves.
To say this is not a fair fight mean you KNOW NOTHING ABOUT MODERN BATTLEFIELD.
Have you actually been on the front line on both receiving end and giving end before? I had.