jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
Can't deny that the Talibans and ISIS are more daring to fight to their deaths compared to your troops. Without advanced weapons, your troops would not go into the fight in the first place.
The word dare to fight, Georgia military is best example to describe that word. They fled without putting up a fight when Russian and abkhaz forces invaded Georgia.
Again, you civvies know nothing about war.
You say Georgia not dare to fight Russia? Then please do explain to me why Georgia still exist as a country today? You do know they face an overwhelming odds and basically hang on a full assault to Russian invasion to Keep the country up, or otherwise they would have been a province of Russia today instead of an independent country, or is it as you say "Russian not dare to attack a small country like Georgia?"
Beside, coming out of your distorted history for once, it was the Georgian who started the Russo-Georgian war in 2008, so their express intention to start a war is to run away? Well, your point make more sense then mind, I supposed. NOT
Uhm.. Russia is indirectly sharing tech with China for money. In return, Russian get to build up their military and spend some of the cash for R&D. Like the SU-35S sales to China. Share with allies doesn't mean giving own land to ally. UK is closest ally of America, do you see Brits giving their lands to American? They share black gold profit from war in Iraq, that's called US shared with Brits.
Moron, care to look at who actually controlling the oil profit in Iraq today? It's China
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/w...s-biggest-benefits-of-iraq-oil-boom.html?_r=0
AND LOL at your R&D, the same Su-35 sale that most Chinese member purported is fake.
Maybe you need to get your facts right first, your "facts" are way off.
Black hawk down movie, the realism i compared was the battle and how it was played in movie compared to real thing. Not the names of casualties.
How do you know about the real thing, what is your reference point to compare a movie about real thing? You served? You went to war?
The real thing you compare to is another Video Game or TV-show, I been to war, I can say for sure you haven't. Nobody talk about war like you do if they actually see what's going on in a war. They would not see it like a kind of game that whoever have the big gun win. I learn that the on the 4th day when I was in Iraq.
The latest f16 is the block 60 f-16e/f operated by your allies in middle east. How do you expect china to get that? If insurgents happened to capture f16 block 50/52 and sold to china, the chinese could cannibalize and performed whatever test necessary to reverse engineer. Pakistan f16c, they paid dearly for 1, Chinese have to handle with extra care without breaking 1 beyond ability to put everything back. Besides, China get to buy from insurgents for the f16s at far cheaper price. It's not unexpected if China already obtained the f14A, f4e.
Back to iraq, have you been sleeping lately? Hezbollah been driving MRAPs and operating Abram tanks. You think they didn't send some of these to China for R&D?
China obtain this, China obtain that. yeah, China can obtain a F-22 and someone have sold them that too. The world's arms market is just "buy-buy-buy"
Beside, you have a better relationship with Iraqi government than Hezbollah and ISIS. The last time I check, Iraqi Government troop were not the one killing Chinese in Xinjiang, it's the ISIS and Hezbollah is allied to ISIS. Even Iran hate Hezbollah. How do you suppose they can steal F-16 from Iraq and transfer them to China via Iran? Not to mention Iraqi F-16 was guarded by US personnel, not Iraqi.
While you at it, why not say Martian steal US technology and share them with China?
And yeah, China have F-14A and F-4E, Abrams too. LOL......if you honestly believe that.
Ah, you're referring South America countries that buy arms from China. Sure, China could look for routes to these countries if 1 of them pissed off your country. America doesn't own south america therefore, there's always alternative route via neighboring countries.
Dude, do you even know what you are saying? There are only one country in Mid-Pacific and East Pacific, that's the US. Every ship transit thru West pacific (The one that facing China) to East Pacific have to go over Hawaii. Have you actually look at the map, there are no country around it.