RazPaK
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2010
- Messages
- 14,056
- Reaction score
- -49
- Country
- Location
Are they Arain or has the author gone overboard?
I don't think Bhuttos are Arain.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are they Arain or has the author gone overboard?
Being idealistic is good, naive no.
talon is above mohammed? jinnah? iqbal? imran khan? bb ?
Well i suppose we are talking about an age group of 13-25.There are chances of relapse.
Let me quote a study for you.
ok i've to go dear,will meet later InshaAllah!
Opinions count yaara, this is just a very heated topic. My own stand would be immediate MUTUAL demilitarization ON BOTH SIDES, in a phased manner obviously (regardless of who's got more troops stationed, although its likely to be us- we've got troops on the LOC to face off against the PAs and then troops for CI/COIN ops too). Both countries can retain what they hold currently in their territories and administer the security of the zones, but maximum autonomy is to be granted to the areas (Kahmir valley in our case- the jammu and ladakhi's won't like any pandering with their status) under the respective constitutions. Reinforcement of sharing of water resources in the area under the IWT- that's a must since there's huge trust deficit there. Eventually render the LOC a soft border with free trade and movement. This is just the super simplified version- the details are far too many. Some say we were close to an agreement like this, who knows? BUT most people in India and Pakistan will not even agree to this- our populations are going to hold on to our respective maximalist positions. I'd like to say that we can agree on a lot of things @Hyperion, @hinduguy, @Armstrong but on this they'll probably hand me my head and completely disagree with me. There I stuck my head out.
talon is above mohammed? jinnah? iqbal? imran khan? bb ?
Opinions count yaara, this is just a very heated topic. My own stand would be immediate MUTUAL demilitarization ON BOTH SIDES, in a phased manner obviously (regardless of who's got more troops stationed, although its likely to be us- we've got troops on the LOC to face off against the PA and then troops for CI/COIN ops too). Both countries can retain what they hold currently in their territories and administer the security of the zones, but maximum autonomy is to be granted to the areas (Kahmir valley in our case- the jammu and ladakhi's won't like any pandering with their status) under the respective constitutions. Reinforcement of sharing of water resources in the area under the IWT- that's a must since there's huge trust deficit there. Eventually render the LOC a soft border with free trade and movement. This is just the super simplified version- the details are far too many. Some say we were close to an agreement like this, who knows? BUT most people in India and Pakistan will not even agree to this- our populations are going to hold on to our respective maximalist positions. I'd like to say that we can agree on a lot of things @Hyperion, @hinduguy, @Armstrong but on this they'll probably hand me my head and completely disagree with me. There I stuck my head out.
Its actually realizing how hollow our beliefs are no matter what they are !