SHUT UP REMEMBER GUJARAT?ONLY HINDUs BRAHMINS DESERVE RESERVATION !
@janon there you go today's master piece for you to end the day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SHUT UP REMEMBER GUJARAT?ONLY HINDUs BRAHMINS DESERVE RESERVATION !
And thus reforms are needed.....Dalits account for about 25% of Indian population but they do not even have 2.5% resources of the nation. Illiteracy, malnutrition, infant mortality, poverty, exploitation are highest in this community. If one thing that really makes me ashamed of my country is the condition of dalits. Muslims are poor too and they also are discriminated but not like them. If any reform is needed of this 67 year old framework that is to expedite the process of their upliftment.
They way you define who belongs to what religion is quite simple actually. If your caste certificate/ nationality/ domicile/ birth certificate/ affadavit claims you are a certain religion, that defines what religion you belong to. If you believe you are a muslim, it doesn't matter what the a shia or sunni says. If you say you are a hindu , thats who you are, doesn't matter if you eat elephants or tigers. You declare your religion, you provide documentation to provide you caste if it applies and that is what the current dispensation is based on.How do you define who belongs to what religion?Sunnis don't think Shias are muslim..while Shias don't think Sunnis are muslim....Neither of them think Ahmedis are muslim....Vegetarians think meat eaters aren't hindus...moreover if you keep up reservation based on religion more 'religious groups' will spring up as fractions of other groups...My personal opinion is religion should not be considered a demography at all...we dont ask people whether they 'believe' in the string theory during the polls....why should anyone asks what kind of god they believe in?
There's a problem...once you start the reservation non-muslims in desperate need of a job(there'll be thousands of em) will change their name declare themselves as muslims and start another controversy of mass conversion...like bollywood stars who changed their names....religion should not be the basis of a demography...it should be biological differences not personal opinions....if personal opinions can get you a reserved post at a job...wouldn't it open the gates to reserve jobs for...say...people who believe in certain political doctrines!And thus reforms are needed.....
If the existing framework has not worked in last 67 years to mitigate the disadvantages of certain communities, it definitely needs a relook to focus on communities not just based on caste and religion but geographic location, local infrastructure, social indicators, state budget allocation, educational framework evaluation, and additional assistance program.
that is the premise of previous comment.
They way you define who belongs to what religion is quite simple actually. If your caste certificate/ nationality/ domicile/ birth certificate/ affadavit claims you are a certain religion, that defines what religion you belong to. If you believe you are a muslim, it doesn't matter what the a shia or sunni says. If you say you are a hindu , thats who you are, doesn't matter if you eat elephants or tigers. You declare your religion, you provide documentation to provide you caste if it applies and that is what the current dispensation is based on.
At-least in India, the government has no business interfering in you religion declaring you a believer or a non-believer.
Devyani Khobragade- Father is IAS, still used reservation to become a doctor first and then IFS officer.
People like Devyani are biggest reasons poor people from her caste are still backward even after 67 years of indepedance.
--Reservation is a birth right of Muslims. 5% is nothing. We need 25% reservations.
---This was the point I was going to make yesterday. Reservations are supposed to be for upliftment so the next generation to come will no longer need it. Devyani should never have gotten the benefit of reservations.
--SHUT UP REMEMBER GUJARAT?ONLY HINDUs BRAHMINS DESERVE RESERVATION !
---I got your point perfectly bro. I worked my *** off to get a medical seat because I am a maratha with zero reservation.
Please look at condition of Africa. Aid does not work. Period.
Make a person work and support him. Don't chew his food for him and put it in his mouth.
Well many Indian Muslims are poor so his statement makes sense.
.
This was the point I was going to make yesterday. Reservations are supposed to be for upliftment so the next generation to come will no longer need it. Devyani should never have gotten the benefit of reservations.
Sanghi come out of the closet already. Only reasons Muslims stayed back because Gandhi and Nheru had promised us special treatment.As regards to reservation to other communities like muslims, women etc. its debatable as to what kind of discrimination they are suffering in our society and whether its universal discrimination. Like a dalit is socially discriminated whether he is a Chief Minister or a daily wage labourer. Just because muslims are poor, they should not get reservation because a poor can be a hindu, christian, muslim, brahmin or dalit. I again want to press the fact that reservations are not a means for economic upliftment but they have a unique special purpose.
They were not promised special treatment. they were promised EQUAL treatment and our constitution gives equal and equitable treatment to all citizens without any discrimination. And why we should get special treatment, we have no handicap.Sanghi come out of the closet already. Only reasons Muslims stayed back because Gandhi and Nheru had promised us special treatment.