MokshaVimukthi
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,960
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
First of all, Einstein was a clerk but that does not necessarily makes every clerk Einstein. And secondly. I am asking for the works by Real scientists before I reject the fakes. Because the fakes have their works published, analysed, debunked and accepted.But our real scientists have not still. I am waiting for it.
You are nobody to ask for works of "real scientists" or reject the "fake". The fact is today history and sociology departments in India is thoroughly discredited for them to claim any moral ground or demand respect or pretend to be judges out to review their peers.
There are ton's of work on islam and Christianity published in very continent, that does not make it any more real than a single paper on quantum physics.
It is the govt. that patronises departments like history and sociology and the past record also show that the govt. action was malicious and full of lies and deceit. Any historian who has been grated 'scholar' status by the state or state sponsored institutions are of questionable scholarship and doubtful character.
It is on such shaky ground that new works of history is being published and as such should be and will be subject to the same system of review and patronising that was done by and for marxist historians.
If a review has to be done of the new age historians, the same review must also be done for all the old historians who now occupy cushy positions and image due to the corrupt past. They you are free to review everybody and judge everybody by the same standards used by scientist and rational thinkers everywhere.