Sudan is totally irrelevant to this discussion. I'm talking about descendants of Black slaves in North Africa and the rest of the Arab world.
Sudanese are some weird arabized Blacks with many being descendants of Arabs and Blacks, and the ancestors always being an Arab man with a Black woman but never a Black man with an Arab woman! Did the Nubian men 1000 years ago like to give their woman to Arab men without getting Arab woman in return?!! Surely they liked it....
Just as Somalis, Sudanese are self-hating Blacks who permanently face racism from the rest of the Arab world.
So don't bring Sudan into this discussion!
So? It just shows that Arabs from GCC countries suck at football and that's why they let (imported) Blacks to play for them. It's no sign of tolerance!
The two black Arab billionaires are Mo Ibrahim and Mohammed Hussein Al Amoudi.
Mo Ibrahim is Sudanese (=weird Arab) and he made his money in England.
Al Amoudi is not fully Black, he is half Arab and half Black, and again his father is Arab and the mother is Black, but never a Black father and an Arab mother!
Al-Kalbani is fully Black and yes, his appointment was a positiv symbol, but if Saudi citizens had a say in whether he should be appointed or not....know where your place is abeed!
If a Saudi is too lazy for a job or if he considers a job to be below his honour, this job may go to Blacks....don't portray this as tolerance!
Correct. My counter-question: Any horror stories from Black Iranians that you
permanently hear in masses from Blacks in the Arab world?
I watched it, this man is total apologetic, his sole aim is to portray American slavery as worse, which it wasn't, as I explained in #293.
First he says Arab settlers "intermarried" with locals, so again (how could it be else) Arab men and Black woman….did the locals give their woman voluntarily to the Arab men?!
Then he says "Arab slavery mixed races, anglo-Saxon slavery separated races"
How did this mixture occur? Was it a harmonious mixture? I take the local woman, force them to be my sex slaves, and then children are born….well yes, this is an absolutely great mixture, waaaayyy better than in the US where slaves were allowed to marry each other, have children, have family….
And then he asks "where are the slaves in the world Arab today?"
Yes correct, I am asking the same question: Where are they? And I already gave the answer! If I enslave a man, cut his penis off, cut his testicles off, take away his ability to reproduce, then he will never have any descendants, and generations later my own descendants can claim "Our forefathers never had slaves"!
This historian only wants to bash the West. But I can understand why he does it, he is a descendant of Arab slave masters and Black female slaves, he somehow tries to find peace with the nature of his own existence, he is like the Somali guy who in this thread claimed "Blacks are as racist as others"....such people always twist the reality, always change the facts because facing the truth is too painfull.
I read the whole first page: nothing but deflections, nothing but excuses, and lies.
The funniest thing is when Arabs come up with stuff like "our slaves were treated better, they were officials, they governed, etc..." Yeah right, you cut my dick off, cut my balls off, rob me of my right to ever have a wife and children, at the same time you use my woman as sex slaves, then you put me in an administrativ position and tell me that I should be thankful for that….wow, I'm really impressed!!!
Arab slavery was the most cruel slavery in world history!
Yes, this one case proofs that Blacks in Iran are treated worse than in Arab countries...…
First, why you talk about "KSA about Afro-Arabs"? The right equivalence is "KSA about the American president".
Larijani said this because the US is the enemy, and because he wanted to portray Obama as the slave of the rich White man (which is true). But still this insult was disgusting and totally unacceptable.
Anti-Black racism exists in Iran, I never denied it, and I am the only one in this thread who admitted it while
all others in this thread denied it, but it's not a big major thing in Iranian society.
No Iranian calls a Black man a slave, while the common word for Blacks in Arab countries is abeed!
Blacks in Iran are in no leading positions, and fortunately such nonsense as quotas for woman and quotas for racial minorities are not an Iranian thing, but apart from this Blacks in Iran can be found in all walks of life, they live like all other Iranians, and they are not treated nearly as badly as in most other Muslim countries (give me evidence that proofs the opposite), and they are not viewed as slaves.
This one that I posted is the perfect example:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/03/200323183606796.html
Why are there 250000 non-Arab domestic workers in Lebanon. More than one million Syrian refugees live in Lebanon, why not employing them as domestic workers? Is it unacceptable for the Arab Herrenmensch to work as a domestic worker? Why do Arab countries never import poor Arabs as domestic servants? And why are these servants always treated so brutally?
Iranians don't import foreign domestic workers. There are three million Afghan refugees in Iran, and many wealthy Iranians employ them as domestic workers. Yes, there is discrimination against Afghans, but not because of racism, Afghans are an Iranian race, but you don't hear the horror stories that you permanently hear out of the Arab world.
So as I said: Don't twist the reality! Arabs are elite Black-haters, they are extremist Black-haters!!!
