Muslim Indians Should Demand A Seperate Nation:--

[24 Hours]

Those dna analysis results usually through up more questions than answers. Similar dna analysis has indicated that humans and dolphins share 90% of the same dna. That Russians and indians have the same heritage, that Scandanavian Europeans share the same heritage as West Africans. They cannot always differentiate racial and physical differences. They simply prove that humans are the same species.

Do you know the definition of genotype and phenotype?

 

[Mutakalim]

Buwahahahah.. lal qila !!! what are you smoking ?? hahahah sorry i cant stop my laugh..

What
Are you bitten by a dog or there is a problem with your comprehension skills. Most of the Indians have it.

 

[Whazzup]

Muslims were given option to migrate on both eastern and western side of India, now those who did not migrate have missed the golden chance. rest there is no scope left now do even discuss this absurd idea in India even in fantasy

True and even thinking that things like beef ban gives Muslims a reason to demand a new country for themselves is absurd and childish . Courts are passing these laws who is stopping Muslims from going there and file a petition against beef ban?

 

[war&peace]

The great article @mastaan khan
This should have been done a long time ago. The hindu-fanatics have taken over india through RSS, Shit-Sena, BJP and VHP. Murdoodi is just the culmination and the public demonstration of that take over that started 60 yrs ago with independence of hindus from a thousand year rule Muslims and 90 yrs rule of Britain.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Do you know the definition of genotype and phenotype?

If I'm honest, not much. I'm no scientist. I'm only concerned with ground reality. When I see a Pakistani man, women or child and then I see an indian man, women or child, I know instantly they are not the same race or heritage. From observing the 2 for the past 25 years in London, I know this to be true.

 

[jamahir]

23 pages and no one thought of asking opinion of actual indian muslims like me and @The_Showstopper.

 

[cool_not]

23 pages and no one thought of asking opinion of actual indian muslims like me and @The_Showstopper.

Please tell, please please please.

 

[Maira La]

Do you know the definition of genotype and phenotype?

Some North Indians "somewhat" resemble eastern Pakistani phenotypes because of their ANI genes. However Indians are mostly of ASI gene stock.
Even the most phenotypically ANI Indian is highly ASI genetically.

 

[jamahir]

Please tell, please please please.

the op's idea is naive... i am as concerned about indian issues as any non-muslim progressive here and it would be betrayal on my part to ask for a separate nation while these progressives work for solutions for here.

rather than muslims create a separate nation, since my joining pdf last year i have been talking of a united subcontinent guided by the progressives... one is this post ( proposal for a new division of south asia | Page 10 )... it is my thread... ignore the silly title ( division ), it should have been "unification".

edit : as a socialist, i talk of removing the concept of nations and not of complicating matters by adding another nation.

@MastanKhan

 

[Trisonics]

Ask this question to an Indian Muslim and they will tell you the problems they face are not Pakistan's business at all. They very well know how to solve/handle situations and not coward enough to fight for another nation. They do not need one, if they did, they would have walked over to Pak. Once Musharraf had to face the wrath of an Indian Muslim much to his embarrassment.

Just one request, just because Pakistanis cannot live with people from other faith, don't assume it's the same case with Indian Muslims too. They gave you the answer back in 1947 when the two nation theory fell flat on its face. Talk to real Indian Muslims to know if they feel the same not the imagined ones. They can fight for their own rights like they have been. None of us live in an ideal world.

You may carry on speaking for Muslims of the world while innocent Shias are slaughtered in your own home. May soothe some soiled egos but doesn't change the facts. Happy day dreaming!

 

[cool_not]

the op's idea is naive... i am as concerned about indian issues as any non-muslim progressive here and it would be betrayal on my part to ask for a separate nation while these progressives work for solutions for here.

rather than muslims create a separate nation, since my joining pdf last year i have been talking of a united subcontinent guided by the progressives... one is this post ( proposal for a new division of south asia | Page 10 )... it is my thread... ignore the silly title ( division ), it should have been "unification".

@MastanKhan

I will support only if new constitution and laws are atheist with no respect to religions.

Secularism do have a fault i.e. respect to all religions.

 

[Skillrex]

What
Are you bitten by a dog or there is a problem with your comprehension skills. Most of the Indians have it.

are you some offsping of zaid hamid !!! coz i have seen him talking about waving flags on lal quila as its his baap ka property.. and certainly same thing goes for you,, my little green friend..

 

[The_Showstopper]

I will support only if new constitution and laws are atheist with no respect to religions.

Secularism do have a fault i.e. respect to all religions.

Indeed that should be the way to go...

23 pages and no one thought of asking opinion of actual indian muslims like me and @The_Showstopper.

Its more like begaani shaadi me abdullah deewana...

 

[jamahir]

I will support only if new constitution and laws are atheist with no respect to religions.

"no respect to religions" will be difficult to achieve practically in the initial phase, but the constitution will be guided by scientific socialism which will ensure that religion does not interfere badly in the social sphere.

for example, weddings should be done as court procedure with only two witnesses other than the bride and groom and the notary... no south asian wastage weddings... things like this.

and yes, no system subsidy or system support for pilgrimages, whether for hajj or for vatican or amarnath.

Secularism do have a fault i.e. respect to all religions.

indeed, and especially so in case of india where secularism means "i will support your religious nonsense if you support my religious nonsense".

 

[cool_not]

"no respect to religions" will be difficult practically to achieve in the initial phase, but the constitution will be guided by scientific socialism which will ensure that religion does not interfere badly in the social sphere.

for example, weddings should be done as court procedure with only two witnesses other than the bride and groom and the notary... no south asian wastage weddings... things like this.

and yes, no system subsidy or system support for pilgrimages, whether for hajj or for vatican or amarnath.



indeed, and especially so in case of india where secularism means "i will support your religious nonsense if you support my religious nonsense".

You give an inch to religion, it ask for a mile.