What's new

Modi has triggered internal war over uniform civil code: Muslim law board

BlackIndian

BANNED
Joined
Sep 13, 2016
Messages
547
Reaction score
-10
Country
India
Location
India
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...m-law-board/story-yixTGpmXIEbTPeQvP6m6FN.html
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...rights-Muslim-bodies/articleshow/54841785.cms

Led by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, several Muslim organisations on Thursday opposed the law commission's questionnaire on the uniform civil code (UCC), declaring that the move amounts to the Modi government+ declaring "war" on their religious rights.

The threat of Muslim organisations to "boycott" the law commission process also comes in the backdrop of the Supreme Court hearing a challenge to triple talaq where the Centre termed the custom unconstitutional and violative of gender equality .

Accusing the government of waging "war" against the community and contending that the UCC, if implemented, will threaten the country's pluralism.


Since Muslims have rejected secularism and are ready to go to war(jihad) if uniform civil code is implement? What should be done now?
 
Poppy cock.

The law of the land & the constitution is to stand, the Govt has given its view to the court.

These jokers want to hold on to their chauvinistic controls the kind which do not exist in upto 20 Muslim nations either.

MPLB is little else than an NGO.
 
If guys are allowed to marry 4 girls then it's only fair a girl can marry 4 guys.
Hinduism allows polygamy and polyandry as well unlike Islam. But let's stick to the topic.

Muslims have shown their true colors. Gandhi and Nehru's vision of secular India has been proven wrong.
 
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...m-law-board/story-yixTGpmXIEbTPeQvP6m6FN.html
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...rights-Muslim-bodies/articleshow/54841785.cms

Led by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, several Muslim organisations on Thursday opposed the law commission's questionnaire on the uniform civil code (UCC), declaring that the move amounts to the Modi government+ declaring "war" on their religious rights.

The threat of Muslim organisations to "boycott" the law commission process also comes in the backdrop of the Supreme Court hearing a challenge to triple talaq where the Centre termed the custom unconstitutional and violative of gender equality .

Accusing the government of waging "war" against the community and contending that the UCC, if implemented, will threaten the country's pluralism.


Since Muslims have rejected secularism and are ready to go to war(jihad) if uniform civil code is implement? What should be done now?

I would destroy these fellows. Every society that people want to immigrate to has uniform civil code.
 
I would destroy these fellows. Every society that people want to immigrate to has uniform civil code.
Destroying 250 million people is no joke. But where there is will there is way. You should have been the Pm of India.
 
You can call many religions which preach violence inhumane too. Should they be abolished as well?

He is not talking of abolishing a religion.

He is talking of an inhuman process a religion has, if others too have equivalent practices they too must stop.

Whats the issue here ?
 
He is not talking of abolishing a religion.

He is talking of an inhuman process a religion has, if others too have equivalent practices they too must stop.

Whats the issue here ?
These so-called inhumane practises are integral to many religions. You abolish these practises you abolish those religions.

He is not talking of abolishing a religion.

He is talking of an inhuman process a religion has, if others too have equivalent practices they too must stop.

Whats the issue here ?
These so-called inhumane practises are integral to many religions. You abolish these practises you abolish those religions.
 
Destroying 250 million people is no joke. But where there is will there is way. You should have been the Pm of India.

we are not talking about killing or hurting anyone
we are talking about moving to the 21st century instead of staying in the 17th century
 
If guys are allowed to marry 4 girls then it's only fair a girl can marry 4 guys.
I am no scholar on the wisdom behind religious provisos in scriptures but this one is very obvious. It is more about identification of parentage which would not have been easy if a single woman were to marry multiple men (unless subjected to DNA testing and so on) as opposed to a single man marrying multiple women

Moreover, I personally believe in freedom of religious practices, so long as they do not hurt religious sentiments of another religion. Hard to achieve the ideal but the underlying intention shall be this and I believe with sincere efforts some kind of reasonable middle grounds could be created

Of all the reasons men fight over, an attempt to connect to one's God shall not even be the last one
 
In the 1990s the objection was you could not find out the father. With DNA testing the objection is invalid. May be time to rewrite the Quran
May be you are not qualified enough to comment on your own religion let alone Islam and the Holy book.

For your information, Quran is the Holy book 'written' by Almighty Allah himself, along with His word that this is the last book. So perhaps there is a need to improve one's understanding of the book and the message it contains rather than trying to 'rewrite it' to fit our own twisted desires
 
These so-called inhumane practises are integral to many religions. You abolish these practises you abolish those religions.

How is it then that close to 20 Muslim nations have abolished such practices and yet remain functioning Muslim nations ?
 

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom