Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Money also matters.
I forgot to add thisto my comment...
BD gets F-7 for BAF..and BD members are not happy....and longing for much better and expensive aircrafts..
Now BD gets MBT-200..again same situation..BD members not happy and longing for a better yet expensive tank.
Money does matter..doesn't it?
yup,nothing wrong with a discussionread the thread again. All of us are happy with our tank! Its just a pakistani claimed that alkhalid is comparable to MBT3000 and someone disagreed. Whats wrong with you people? This is a discussion forum! There is nothing wrong with BD members
any thing enter Bangladesh its become 10 time superior from whole world automatically .as we say in saraiki a shemale burn a baby and then kill him with so much kisses in urdu heejery ke gher bacha paida hoa choom choom ker maar dala
now bangladeshi cammo vt-1 is far superior from alkhalid alkhalid-1 type99 t99 markava abrams and whtaever left
These tanks will be deployed in the North-West of BD and they will be facing Indian T-90s which they can easily handle on a one-to-one basis.
Even if the UK or US was willing to sell us there tanks, they would have been twice as expensive.
are you naturally stupid or just trying to be funny?
btw VT-1A – Heavily upgraded variant, with new interior, new turret, new gun, new electronics, new domestic 1300 horsepower or 1500 horsepower engine, and new armor. Its appearance and standards approach that of the Type 96G and Type 99
well your 2000 and 2010 logic is stupid too.
CIVIL discussions PLEASE.
Hehehe..The days tanks handling tanks are long gone.... If this really is for India, then these will face a squad of Apache first..
These tanks will be deployed in the North-West of BD and they will be facing Indian T-90s which they can easily handle on a one-to-one basis.
Even if the UK or US was willing to sell us there tanks, they would have been twice as expensive.
First of all, why would they be used against Indian T-90s?
It is debatable that Russian T-90 is the best tank in the world, not to mention the fact India has 1000s of them. Not to mention India's Arjun MBT which apparently out powered T-90? And it's newer version Arjun MK-2 with 93 upgrades, including improved missile-firing capability against long-range targets, panoramic sight with night vision to engage targets effectively at night, containerisation of the ammunition, enhanced main weapon penetration; additional ammunition types, explosive reactive armour, an advanced air-defence gun to engage helicopters; a mine plough, an advanced land navigation system and a warning system which can fire smoke grenades to confuse laser guidance. Other upgrades are an enhanced Auxiliary power unit providing 8.5 KW (from 4.5 KW) and an improved gun barrel, changes in the commander's panoramic sight with eye safe LRF, night vision capability including for driver, digital control harness, new final drive, track and sprocket? Basically everything you can put on a tank.
So, did Bangladesh buy these 44 tanks for Indian threat? lool You'd be better off portraying Myanmar as your 'imaginary threat' than India. It would make more sense.
Tanks are primarily designed to fight other tanks.
Apaches are very vulnerable to modern man-portable SAMs. This is one of the reasons the US never deployed them against the Serbs.
BD has hundreds of QW-2 SAM systems that can engage the Apache helicopter.