arp2041
BANNED
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2012
- Messages
- 10,406
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
That is ture, but India agreed to partition on the bases of religion. Thus India should not have interfered when Pakistan was dealing with Kashmir. India had to use military force to remove some of the princely states, and Pakistan did not object or interfere. Heck, legally Pakistan owns Hyderabad and a few other states, but we knew that those states are Hindu majority and morally we should not take them. Hence when India invaded them, we did not cause a fuss.
Yet India, despite being so big, would not allow Kashmir to go to Pakistan.
Again, India is the only one to blame for all the ill will and shenanigans that are going on between our two countries.
Din't get u, India send it's forces only when Maharaja of Kashmir signed the instrument of accession, so how is it interference when it's India whose territory is attacked, it's called self defence. While in case of Hyderabad, did the Nizam signed the instrument of accession with Pakistan??