Large aircraft carriers compared

[blackops]

good work brother would be nice to see our ac to here when it hits the sea

 

[madooxno9]

thanks...guy ^^^^ but i see people here on military forum have more interest in VETO POWER ..OF INDIAN...LOL.... NEXT I WILL BRING UP THE up coming aircraft carriers from countries like INDIA , CHINA, RUSSIA AND OTHERS....

thank you all for your corrections .....

 

[madooxno9]

Conclusion
Overall the USN’s Nimitz class carrier wins hands down, but not across the board. It’s weapons systems and sensors are inferior to the Kuznetsov and Charles De Gaulle but this is mitigated by the abundance and excellence of its escorts ; i.e. the others have a greater emphasis on sensors and defensive aids because they need them more. The obvious loser though is Sao Paulo; so much potential, such an inadequate fit and no worthwhile air-defence escorts.

 

[justanobserver]

This is from militaryphotos.net

OP should give them credit

 

[madooxno9]

yes sir it's from militaryphotos.net.. it was done in 2007 and i had it in my fav. so i thought it will be nice to share something like this in here...

as you have mentioned i will with due respect name the guy Planeman who shared such nice info ...

 

[Thomas]

Conclusion
Overall the USN’s Nimitz class carrier wins hands down, but not across the board. It’s weapons systems and sensors are inferior to the Kuznetsov and Charles De Gaulle but this is mitigated by the abundance and excellence of its escorts ; i.e. the others have a greater emphasis on sensors and defensive aids because they need them more. The obvious loser though is Sao Paulo; so much potential, such an inadequate fit and no worthwhile air-defence escorts.

U.S. carriers travel in strike groups ( aprox 6-7 support ship) or battle groups ( aprox 16-17 ships). carriers of both groups rely on support ships to provide th bulk of the anti-missile and ASW defense. With the Aegis defense system more then able to control it all.

 

[500]

Conclusion
Overall the USN’s Nimitz class carrier wins hands down, but not across the board. It’s weapons systems and sensors are inferior to the Kuznetsov and Charles De Gaulle.

Nimitz is a carrier, Kuznetsov is heavy cruiser with some aircrafts. And Hawkeyes are better than any onboard radars because they can see over horizon.

 

[madooxno9]

^^^ i agree but Russians mission was different from those of US Navy and Royal Navy... they built “heavy aircraft-carrying- cruiser" carrier + cruiser.....

 

[madooxno9]

U.S. carriers travel in strike groups ( aprox 6-7 support ship) or battle groups ( aprox 16-17 ships). carriers of both groups rely on support ships to provide th bulk of the anti-missile and ASW defense. With the Aegis defense system more then able to control it all.

AGREED SIR..

 

[GodlessBastard]

Kuznetsov is a carrier.

It is called a "heavy cruiser" just to make the Turks happy.

 

[madooxno9]

[/QUOTE]It is called a "heavy cruiser" just to make the Turks happy.[/QUOTE]

WHY TURKS???

 

[rockstarIN]

U.S. carriers travel in strike groups ( aprox 6-7 support ship) or battle groups ( aprox 16-17 ships). carriers of both groups rely on support ships to provide th bulk of the anti-missile and ASW defense. With the Aegis defense system more then able to control it all.

All carriers in the world travel with other ship escorts, right?

 

[IND151]

where vikramaditya and IC 1 do stand compared with these top carriers? can someone post detailed analysis of them?

 

[IND151]

It is called a "heavy cruiser" just to make the Turks happy.

WHY TURKS???

exactly. i was going to ask same question.

 

[HROBOS]

exactly. i was going to ask same question.

There are certain international rules of passage through the Bosporus and the Dardanelles (limiting the types and number of ships).