What's new

Kerry-Lugar Bill or an attempt to further pressurize Pakistan

Obama signs Kerry-Lugar Bill into law
Friday, October 16, 2009
By Sami Abraham


WASHINGTON: A day after the US Congress attached an explanatory statement to the Kerry-Lugar Bill to clarify its intent, the US president signed the Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act of 2009 here on Thursday.

President Obama signed the bill into law at the White House at 9:15 am.“This law is the tangible manifestation of broad support for Pakistan in the US, as evidenced by its bipartisan, bicameral, unanimous passage in Congress,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement.

The statement said that the United States wanted to engage Pakistan on the basis of strategic partnership, “grounded in support for Pakistan’s democratic institutions and the Pakistani people.”

“And this act formalises that partnership, based on a shared commitment to improving the living conditions of the people of Pakistan through sustainable economic development, strengthening democracy, rule of law and combating extremism that threatens Pakistan and the United States,” Gibbs added.

Obama signs Kerry-Lugar Bill into law
 
.
The timing couldn't be more perfect. When Pakistan is facing the worst turmoil, bill gets signed in the back ground hoping no one makes too much fuss about the insulting tone used in the bill that threatens the very foundations of the country called Pakistan. What a shame we still consider TTP as enemy number one when clearly it should be some one else starting with the letter U and ending with A.
 
.
The fiery Speech that for the time Shah Mahmud Qureshi is making in the National Assembly of Pakistan defending the cause of Carry-Bill making his mouth movement more hard and ridiculous than his wordings; if such a speech he would have been delivering on the defense of the country before the United States government machinery that would have been far more profitable to the country.
He has brought a trouble for the people and his government for its shortsightedness in the form of Bill and a noose of slavery for the nation.
 
.
Not defending your govt, however i feel the democratic govt's first priority is to ensure there is enough funds to run state functions , like police, rationing, food supply, reconstruction, employment.
On this forum we were recently reading comments and frustration by people about sugar and gas prices / prices of commodities.
See its simple.. If they dont take aid they face:
1. America's wrath.
2. Economy will collapse, and with it will all the state functions. which will lead to chaos and disorder and fall of the state.
3. With both above there is no guarantee that terror will stop.
4. But funds for Salary of Armed forces definitely will.

If they take the Bill :

1. Economy will survive and attempts to make it self sustaining can continue to be taken.
2. Get the money ASAP will help the Govt machinery today, if they in years or 2 time can become self relent, Govt can abandon the aid terms later at any stage.
3. Lanlord (Lessor) always have right to terminate the rental agreement with Lessee (America) at any stage it deems appropriate for her.
4. As far as ousting terrorists and terror safe havens from Pakistan every one in Pakistan on this forum etc have same opinion, so that condition should be okay with Pak.
5. As far as Nuclear assets are concerned i think it is over blown by Pakistani, non mainstream media. There are no actions from USA as of date to suggest that they want to finish Pak's nukes with conditions on the bill.
 
.
Jarnee, you are not right at the moment. It is not a sum so big to run the whole country however, it is well utilized by the political machinery as it gets directly into their pockets and are not asked about by Americans upto the time they play on their signals. The damage in the said war against terrorism is far more greater than the money that is received.
 
.
$7.5 B isn't enough to better the situation on ground. Things are going way bad and I bet this money is no way near what can help.
 
.
Reaping the whirlwind

By Inayatullah | Published: October 17, 2009

Pakistan's federal government, led by the PPP, sowed the wind and is now reaping the whirlwind. Its inadequacies, shenanigans and poor performance are taking their toll. It mishandled the energy problem. It let the sugar and atta crises spin out of control, while its grip on the law and order is weak and disappointing. Stories about corruption, extravagance and mismanagement abound. Cavalierly, it jogs along and hopes to muddle through for another three years.

What the government cannot get away from is the manner in which its present leadership managed to grab power. How very smart of it indeed. How, after the assassination of the Party's leader, a cabal of grasping upstarts rushed into the portals of power and how they resorted to all kinds of tricks to retain their hold on the helm. It is ironic, indeed, that all their endeavours to win the confidence of their masters in Washington and London have failed to improve their tarnished image. It is not only their past, but their inability to deliver that keeps them in the dock.

Furthermore, the Kerry-Lugar Bill, more than anything else, brings into bold relief the federal government's remarkable characteristics and capabilities.

One: Their obsession with begging. Give us otherwise we will die of starvation. Please, friends come to our help. Please, please don't let us down. If you don't help us, you too will suffer. The whole world will feel the pain. You are free to attach any conditions, just promise us a free flow of dollars.

Two: We are apprehensive of the military's influence. So please help us control their ambition.

Three: We have no objection to your interrogating our nationals involved with our nuclear programmes. It doesn't really matter. With friends like you why should we worry about the protection of our national assets?

Four: We have no objection to your monitoring activities of Pakistanis in places like Quetta and Muridke. Please help us to stop them using our territories against our neighbours. Of course, we are an independent country. We are only exercising our freedom when we let you do so many things, on our behalf. As the saying goes: "A friend in need is a friend indeed."

Five: Knowing that it is your money, it is only fair that we let you use it the way you think it is best for us. What is the harm in your bypassing the Government of Pakistan, in larger mutual interests? Let our procedures and rules of business not hamper you from selecting projects, choose places for various activities, opt for organisations and personnel. We are sure that your plans and designs will bring us prosperity and success. Whether you do it or we do it, after all the beneficiaries will be Pakistanis.

Six: Why should we object to the 50 percent or so of the funds going back to your country if you are good enough to provide consultants (whatever be their calibre), contractors and other intermediaries? Why shouldn't you too benefit? After all we are talking about an Enhanced Partnership, as spelt out in the Congressional Act of 2009. Partnership, indeed, implies benefits on both sides.

Seven: We are a democratic government elected by the people of Pakistan. Therefore, there was no need for us to consult the opposition, our coalition partners and the military as far as the Kerry-Lugar Bill is concerned. We, after all, have the peoples' mandate. But still when the opposition and the military stirred up a storm, we responded and permitted a discussion to be held on the bill in the Parliament. We have taken the extraordinary step to send our foreign minister back to Washington. He has been able to secure a "historic" explanation from the US Congressional leaders. They have certified that the sovereignty of Pakistan will remain unscathed. What more could we do? Just read the Joint Explanatory Statement: "The legislation does not seek in any way to compromise Pakistan's sovereignty, impinge on Pakistan's national security interests, or micromanage any aspect of Pakistani military or civilian operations."
(Quite another matter that the whole text of the Act, stays totally intact, with all its conditions and clearly spelt out obligations on the part of the Government of Pakistan.)

Eight: What is most disconcerting is that the opposition, military, judiciary, media and even the Americans do not trust us.

And finally a word about PML-N chief Mian Nawaz Sharif. For more than a month he was out of the country and now on his return he is accusing us of 'betraying the national interest'. All along he has been assuring us of his support. Why doesn't he keep his word?

Yes, we have usually not kept our word or commitments. We despite assurances have not repealed the 17th Amendment. But this does not mean that Mian Sahib should oppose the Kerry-Lugar Bill which brings so much money to our poor country. Strange that we do so much for the good of the people and our beloved country, and nobody appreciates our selfless services. Yes, we are the products of NRO. But it is because of the NRO that we forced Musharraf to resign and therefore the co-chairman of the PPP is the honourable occupant of the presidency. Long live NRO. Long live Kerry-Lugar Bill. Long live honourable Berman, Kerry, Lugar and Biden. Three cheers for Mr Barack Hussein Obama for signing the Kerry-Lugar Bill and turning it into an Act of partnership. Long live Islamabad-Washington partnership.

Pakistan Paindabad.
The writer is a political and international relations analyst.
Email: pacade@brain.net.pk

Reaping the whirlwind | Pakistan | News | Newspaper | Daily | English | Online
 
.
DAWN.COM | Columnists | Bullying the ?bloody civilians?

I have read the complete text of the Kerry-Lugar Bill four times. I find nothing in it that impinges on Pakistan’s sovereignty, which went out the window with the Pakistan Army’s first steps towards forming a symbiotic, but completely inferior, relationship with the United States military.

I give below verbatim (parenthesis mine) an exact copy, but slightly abbreviated, of a Top Secret but now declassified (vide NND 959417 14/1/93) letter written by Gen Mohammad Ayub Khan, C-in-C of the Pakistan Army, to Admiral Arthur Radford, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff, Pentagon [sic], Washington D.C. (Please read at Afghanistan - Pakistan documents - by Paul Wolf)

‘General Headquarters
Rawalpindi
[Pakistan]
27th Sep ‘55.
D.O. No. 7/36/C-in-C.

My dear Admiral Radford,
Considering that you have been such a good friend, I thought you would be interested to know how the affairs of military aid stand looked at from our angle … which to say the least is gloomy.

2. In early 1954, we were informed that Meyer’s Mission was coming out to Pakistan to negotiate details of military aid with us. In order to prepare our appreciation and plan for presentation to this Mission, we made several approaches to Pentagon [sic] to give us an indication of the scope of the aid. On failing to get any reply we prepared our case on the following basis.
In the event of major aggression against Pakistan, determine the forces required to:-
(a) Defend it.
(b) Launch a counter-offensive from it.
The result of appreciation on the above basis gave us an estimate of the additional effort to be put in by USA. [sic] after deducting our maximum effort on one or both scores, depending on how far America was prepared to go. It was not till the end of our briefing we were told [sic] that … the Mission had come out to find out our deficiencies in nuts and bolts and no more.

3. Then came our meeting in Washington in October ‘54. On it [sic] we were told
that America would be prepared to complete one ½ Division of our Armour and four Divisions of Infantry, and as we were spending the maximum we could on Armed Forces, apart from weapons etc required our additional
internal expense [salaries, staff cars?] would also be covered for these Formations. The programme was to take three years to complete. Thereafter our dealings began with the USMAAG.

4 .Now that the target was set, I thought the things will move smoothly so long as a sound working arrangement was evolved between the American Staff and our Staff. So, I issued a directive to my staff that they will work in close collaboration with the Americans, who were also asked to work more or less on a joint staff basis with our fellows. Unfortunately I failed to obtain American cooperation on this with the result that when our staff presented our requirements list it was objected to on the ground that our Divisional strength was in excess of theirs, which could not be supported. In any case no more than 40,000 additional men could be catered for. Our figure was 56,000 men. When asked for the working of the figure of 40,000 men, no satisfactory answer could be given.

5. Thereupon the whole thing was put in the melting pot and our staff went to work again. We reduced our establishments to remain within 40,000 men additional permissible limit with the following effect:-
(a) Reducing of officer strength by 20per cent.
(b) Reduction of JCO and OR strength by 10per cent.
(c) Conversion of A/Tk units to Fd Arty Units.
(d) Conversion of two 5.5’ gun units to 155 mm How units.
(e) Non-activation of certain units.
(f) Deletion of expansion in Schools & Centers [sic].

6. Our requirements based on above [sic] were then worked out and submitted to USMAAG and presumably accepted by the Department of the Army, who allotted certain amount of funds for internal use for the fiscal year 1954-55. Incidentally the allotment for a certain set of accommodation [!] estimated to cost 16.64 crores [sic] rupees was 7.40 crores and so on. Meanwhile, the whole of Pakistan Army [sic] in general and especially the five ½ Divisions earmarked for completion are being churned up and re-organised to conform as far as practicable to American establishments.

7. Then came the bomb-shell in the form of the message from the Head of the USMAAG … shorn of its verbiage it reads that as far as the Army is concerned the ceiling of military aid is 75.5 million dollars and that all talk of balancing five ½ Division [sic] is revoked.

8. Forgive me for being frank, but I would be failing in my duty if I did not tell you that our people are completely frustrated. They think they have been given an enormous amount of work unnecessarily and that they have been let down. They are in a mood not to accept an American word however solemnly given. This is sad in that it does not augur well for our future good relationship which was one of the things I had been hoping to develop.

9. What the political repercussions be [sic] when this news gets known, and after all you cannot conceal facts indefinitely in a Democracy [this is really rich coming from the grand-daddy of coups d’état in the Land of the Pure!], I do not know. But one thing I do know that [sic] this government will come under tremendous pressure and fire from within and without.
Hope you are in very good health.
With best wishes,
Yours sincerely,
M.A. Khan’

So, gentlemen, why the discourteous, nay rebellious reaction to the Kerry-Lugar bill? Bullying the ‘bloody civilians,’ eh? After all your great forebear even gave out the TO&E (table of organisation and equipment) of the Pakistan Army in such detail? Surely the bit about the secretary of state certifying ever so often that the bloody civilians in Pakistan ‘exercise effective control of the military…’!?

I can only appeal to President Obama not to change a single word in the bill except ‘or the reallocation of Pakistan’s financial resources that would otherwise be spent for programmes and activities unrelated to its nuclear weapons programme.’

For that is our money. Otherwise tell ‘em to take it or leave it. Our Rommels and Guderians are not about to alight from their top of the line BMWs and Mercedes and climb into Suzuki Mehrans.
 
. .
This is a very sad situation for pakistan, even with the promised 1.5 billion aid which equals to 7.5 billion for the 5 years, it will not be even close to what pakistan needs, in fact this will weaken pakistan as it will make them reply even more now on external help. What Pakistan must do is what India did in 1992 under the inspirational leadership of then finance minister Dr.Manmohan singh, he heavily regulated the economy, introduced new tax laws and opened up the country to foriegn investment. The amount of potential pakistan has can easily be utilized if there are educated and smart people governing the country not people like Zardari who's previous names we all know. I think it time that the people of pakistan choose the right leader and not people like Nawaz Sharif who are even worse than Zardari. I really think that Zardari is trying his level best, but he does not posses the intellectual knowledge to run a country. I am 100% sure the of the 7.5 billion dollars promised only 20% of the amount will actually make it to the people who need it as most of it will get eaten away by the numerous corrupt officials that exist. With the amount of regulations and conditions involved with this bill, Pakistan must deny this money to save its national pride, its better to starve to death than to accept something that will make you a slave. Can anyone tell me if there are any other potential leaders in pakistan ? i am not aware of any and im sure there are others who are worthy of leading, can someone answer this for me ?
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom