Armstrong
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 19,390
- Reaction score
- 94
- Country
- Location
@Armstrong
LeT and JeM are terrorist organizations and even banned by Pakistan. They were founded and supported by Pakistan before they gt banned.
They are like Al-Qaeda Wannabes.
Indeed they are banned in Pakistan I wonder what evidence do we really have for their involvement in Kashmir & at that the intensity of that involvement !
As for extra-judicial killings, aren't Pakistan Army and ISI doing it Pakistan, so why single out Indian Army. Of course, in conflicts , these things happen. Is it a big surprise for you ?
And spare me Holier than Thou Pakistan Army. You know why Mukti Bahini formed.
Because the issue is Kashmir not Pakistan & because I wasn't accusing the Indian Army of anything...I just said that I won't be surprised if that were found to be true when I look back at History & we do know why Mukhti Bahini was formed & that too is a part of the same discourse on opinions, exaggerations & omissions taken for incontrovertible history instead of an honest to god, neutral commission to determine what really happened in '71 & whether the figures quoted & those accused are rightly so or is it all just a farce whipped up by the other side.
The same applies to Kashmir....I'm not trying to convince you because without facts we can say nothing & the fact of the matter is that there are no facts...only opinions ! You, on the other hand, have created this thread & have maintained the discourse that you have to further what you believe really happened therein & who was responsible for it - I'm required to give you the space to express yourself but I'm also well within my rights to ask for evidence if I am to believe it ! Or was the intention of this thread just to think out load & not discuss the issue ? In that case I will say no more.
It has to be done for official purpose. But they accept this article to put it on their website. Disclaimer is always put on such articles.
BTW Did you read the article ?
Oh please they accept this article & yet explicitly mention that they don't endorse it ? I've read disclaimers in the past & I know what an article or a research paper is & what an official report is after conducting a proper fact finding mission.
Yes I did read the article & I did note the chronic dearth of any references mentioned therein or any attempt to explore the veracity of basic assertions instead of taking them on face value.
Last edited by a moderator: