New Recruit
New Recruit
..but that doesnt change the truthWho cares about BLA terrorists or you. And if you are very willing to bring this irrelevant Baluch issue in this thread. Why should we talk only about Kashmir freedom movement. Let's talk about everything from maoists to nagas. From ULFA to Khalistanis. From Mezoram to Chattisgarh. We were talking about IOK because it is an occupied territory and not an Indian territory. But sincw you keep bringing Pakistan's internal issues between the discussion then we can talk about Indian internal issues also.
No they dont! You sir, are absolutely wrong. It takes real brains to achieve something of that caliber. Any idiot can pick up an AK-47 and given some instructions can try to wreck havoc. But to come up as an IAS topper needs brains, which sorry to say, is scant in some places.
From a sane person's pov, those that disturb peace and install terror in the minds of the local population are called terrorists. Normal people dislike such kind and call them scumbags. They work with authorities to report the activities of such scumbags to help eliminate them. This is what is happening in Kashmir today. So, Pakistan's apparent policy of "moral" support is a just facade for territorial ambitions in the region.
Mark my words, no matter how hard Pakistan tries, its attempts to grab the territory will just fizzle out, just like your futile support for the Khalistani movement. Those so called slogans and support for Pakistan "shows" are few and far in between. The common Kashmiri is more concerned with the common welfare and what the Indian govt can provide. People have now realized the futility of the so called armed struggle, and are now working with the state government for a better future, the doctor's topping IAS being one prime example.
Good that we, atleast, agree on this.
There are multiple groups active in the region, to merely point to one particular group without any evidence smacks of a propaganda effort.
In most wars, infrastructure, civilian or military, has been attacked - the US has did it in Afghanistan and Iraq - so why only hold the Kashmiri insurgents feet to the fire?
In the Baitullah Mehsud killing, reports from US sources quoting US and Pakistani intelligence officials stated that the footage from the targeting UAV indicated his wife was present with other individuals (physician?). S-2 argued that 'associating with the enemy', or even being in their proximity, makes one the enemy, and that therefore the deliberate killing of these non-combatants is 'justified' in US eyes. Perhaps one should then hold the world's sole Super Power accountable before blaming Kashmiri insurgents.
No other groups have indicated any interest in fighting the Pakistani State in those regions, so yes, it can be claimed with reasonable certainty that those fighting the PA and attacking civilians and non-civilians belong to the aforementioned groups. Also, the fact that in most tribal agencies the PA has evacuated the locals means most of those remaining are terrorists fighting the State.
A civilian non-Baluch who teaches in a school or college, educating Baluch youth (amongst others) to have a better future is not a 'usurper' or 'occupier'. A non-Baluch who is a laborer doing really nasty work in poor conditions in a mine is not a 'usurper' or 'occupier'. Baluchistan is part of Pakistan, and when the rulers of the Princely States, and people of other territories comprising the modern province of Baluchistan, and people of all other provinces, chose to join Pakistan they accepted that there would be free movement of all Pakistanis across Pakistan. That is why Karachi is such an ethnically diverse city.
Sure, as there is evidence from AI, HRW and others about atrocities committed by the IA, but the leadership of most Kashmir groups, and the IA, has condemned such incidents and does not advocate it as SOP, do they?
