Stop trolling dear.
Only in IOK they mourned Black Day
I'm not Trolling. Feel Free to read the Article.
AJK observes Black Day
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stop trolling dear.
Only in IOK they mourned Black Day
You have only words like if, can. It seems the high voter turnout in Kashmir shocked many Pakistanis.
As i told you before,no Pakistani is shocked by such a large turnout. we completely trust PTI and how they censor "fake news" okay!!
You trust the PTI but PTI lost the Pakistan's election
That is why I went there. Handful of Separatist Leaders are Pro Pakistani and not all Kashmiris...
Its the sunni majority of kashmir who are against Indian rule and want to be with pakistan (or independent). The rest (hindus of jammu, buddists of laddakh, and shias of kashmir/laddakh) want to be with India.Overwhelming majority of Kashmiris do not want to live under Indian rule , that is a fact . Those handful of separatist leaders can get thousands of Kashmiris out to protest/demonstrate against Indian rule and declare strikes in the valley , get the people to hoist the crescent and star and burn the tricolor but no such thing ever happens in Azad Kashmir or Gilgit Baltistan , ironic , isn't it ? But , then again even the most biased of Indians know , where does the loyalty of Kashmiris in the valley lie , admitting it in front of us may be difficult though .
Its the sunni majority of kashmir who are against Indian rule and want to be with pakistan (or independent). The rest (hindus of jammu, buddists of laddakh, and shias of kashmir/laddakh) want to be with India.
Because sunnis enjoy majority in J&K, one can say most kashmiris hate India.
Assassination or side-lining efforts guaranteed. Either that or some serious spanking by the state is in order.
Well because the three group hindus/buddists/shia are minority, they risk persecution by sunnis if kashmir becomes Independent or goes to pakistan. Even now they are a minority nobody talks about and dominated by sunnis.Quite right , though I do not understand the Shia thing here . because they live on the Pakistani side too and we never ever had trouble from no one in Pakistan Administered Kashmir . What more can you tell me , about them ? Even you know , where the majority of the Kashmiris are concentrated . The Valley . Majority of them are secessionist and aren't content with Indian rule .
It looks like , even he's not happy with the Indian treatment of Kashmiris now . Hence the recent statements regarding ' mistreatment ' and ' being treated differently ' and ' solve the issue ' . Though , he's moving in the right direction by asking the Indian Govt to politically settle the issue by negotiations with secessionist and Pakistani Govt . Though , I can tell you from my study of the history of Kashmir , he's not that different from his father actually .
The partition wasn't handled properly it seems. Amongst others the 3 options which should be discussed are the "all or nothing" option, ie total re-partitioning which would be all Muslims under either a Muslim state or multiple Muslims states thus leaving a Hindustan India which comprises only Hindus /Sikhs/Jains/Christians/Athiests etc and offcourse banning any Muslim from being a citizen of this newly created state of India or ; a referendum in all existing states of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh to determine which states want to remain in which country; or maintaining the status quo of the current maps and agreeing that the existing demarcations become the recognized borders of each country. The first option seems to be the least workable and the least humane option imo.
Certain Indian members repeatedly point out that the conflict in IoK is perpetrated by Sunni Muslims who want to join with Pakistan. This is pure speculation . The Indian government or the state government of IoK should have carried out a survey in an attempt to determine what the aspiration and the wishes are of the majority of its people. Until it does so, it is purely speculating as to who wants what in that area. There are separatists who want independence, those who want to remain within India and those who want to be part of Pakistan. That is all we seem to know about IoK.
GoI or kashmir govt will not carry out any survey or referendum because they fear the worst.The partition wasn't handled properly it seems. Amongst others the 3 options which should be discussed are the "all or nothing" option, ie total re-partitioning which would be all Muslims under either a Muslim state or multiple Muslims states thus leaving a Hindustan India which comprises only Hindus /Sikhs/Jains/Christians/Athiests etc and offcourse banning any Muslim from being a citizen of this newly created state of India or ; a referendum in all existing states of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh to determine which states want to remain in which country; or maintaining the status quo of the current maps and agreeing that the existing demarcations become the recognized borders of each country. The first option seems to be the least workable and the least humane option imo.
Certain Indian members repeatedly point out that the conflict in IoK is perpetrated by Sunni Muslims who want to join with Pakistan. This is pure speculation . The Indian government or the state government of IoK should have carried out a survey in an attempt to determine what the aspiration and the wishes are of the majority of its people. Until it does so, it is purely speculating as to who wants what in that area. There are separatists who want independence, those who want to remain within India and those who want to be part of Pakistan. That is all we seem to know about IoK.
GoI or kashmir govt will not carry out any survey or referendum because they fear the worst.
The partition wasn't handled properly it seems. Amongst others the 3 options which should be discussed are the "all or nothing" option, ie total re-partitioning which would be all Muslims under either a Muslim state or multiple Muslims states thus leaving a Hindustan India which comprises only Hindus /Sikhs/Jains/Christians/Athiests etc and offcourse banning any Muslim from being a citizen of this newly created state of India or ; a referendum in all existing states of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh to determine which states want to remain in which country; or maintaining the status quo of the current maps and agreeing that the existing demarcations become the recognized borders of each country. The first option seems to be the least workable and the least humane option imo.
Thanks for the advice but we have a slightly different approach from Pakistan on such issues.
Yes, just like you are in the Northern Areas and Balochistan.
Oh yeah, you simply put a curfew. Call protestors paid hooligans and so on.
Btw, should I remind you of your tacit violation of forum rules in bringing in Pakistan as a diversionary and derailment tactic?
But then again , the title of senior members is joke for most. Lost of posts mean keyboard diarrhoea, not intelligence.