JL-3 Test

[j20611]

You must learned this in CPC reeducation camp.



We shutdown internet because internet is freely available in India. YouTube, Facebook etcq.and other channels are not banned like your country. Tqhat's why we shut it down for one or two days. When required . When you say that you can sink American aircraft carrier with couple of your missiles, that itself shows how much free access you have for World media in China.

You people only use internet to look up underage bobs and vegana

 

[Surya 1]

You people only use internet to look up underage bobs and vegana

The data is available on who surfs which site. You can check the results. It is very interesting.

 

[OIO]

It has potential to even surpass the Columbia class SSBN.

Since a de-industrialized US now has a lot of troubles to build a such sophisticated boomer.

It's hard to maintain sophisticated equipments after deindustrialization not to mention to build.

 

[Dante80]

It's hard to maintain sophisticated equipments after deindustrialization not to mention to build.

In principle, yes. But the military-industrial complex in the US has actually fared pretty well over the years, partly due to legislation like ITAR and pretty steady funding by the US Federal Government. Aggressive mergers over the last 20 years have definitely removed some capacity through the elimination of corporate redundancies, but overall output has remained pretty strong. Have in mind that while the prevalence of COTS low TRL items in defense projects has soared over the years, US has maintained the capacity to duplicate said items if the need arises.

If one would want to be ironic about this (from a Real Politik point of view), the war on terror and other ventures of the US Administrations historically have actually transferred immeasurable amounts of public monies to the indigenous defense industry, while a healthy foreign arm sales rate via the FMS and other programs combined with aggressive sanctions against potential competition have kept said industry booming.

 

[smooth manifold]

You must learned this in CPC reeducation camp.



We shutdown internet because internet is freely available in India. YouTube, Facebook etcq.and other channels are not banned like your country. Tqhat's why we shut it down for one or two days. When required . When you say that you can sink American aircraft carrier with couple of your missiles, that itself shows how much free access you have for World media in China.

Are you implying shutting down Internet is typical of Indian style freedom. then you're humiliating yourself by repeating the word "free".
Youtube, Facebook can be easily accessed by VPN if one wants. That's totally different from India's shutting down Internet physically. What do you mean by "world media"? They're just some US firms. They can not represent the world at all.

 

[j20blackdragon]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1209620423849234434

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1209620423849234434

LMAO @ his range "estimate" of 5,600 miles. The JL-3's range is not a millimetre shorter than the Trident D5, and very likely a fair bit longer.

 

[Dante80]

LMAO @ his range "estimate" of 5,600 miles. The JL-3's range is not a millimetre shorter than the Trident D5, and very likely a fair bit longer.

D5 doesn't have a published (unclassified) range though.

 

[LeGenD]

A video presentation of the US Aegis system. Currently installed on the most sophisticated US Navy warships and in the process of being set up throughout the entire range of NATO naval forces, this missile defense system was completely knocked out in the Black Sea by a Russian electronic warfare device.

As the Russian jet approached the US vessel, the electronic device disabled all radars, control circuits, systems, information transmission, etc. on board the US destroyer. In other words, the all-powerful Aegis system, now hooked up - or about to be - with the defense systems installed on NATO’s most modern ships was shut down, as turning off the TV set with the remote control.

The Russian Su-24 then simulated a missile attack against the USS Donald Cook, which was left literally deaf and blind. As if carrying out a training exercise, the Russian aircraft - unarmed - repeated the same maneuver 12 times before flying away.

After that, the 4th generation destroyer immediately set sail towards a port in Romania.
Since that incident, which the Atlanticist media have carefully covered up despite the widespread reactions sparked among defense industry experts, no US ship has ever approached Russian territorial waters again.
According to some specialized media, 27 sailors from the USS Donald Cook requested to be relieved from active service.

Russian theatrics are not to be taken seriously.

https://www.quora.com/What-happened-to-the-USS-Donald-Cook-in-the-Black-Sea-when-the-Russian-fighters-made-numerous-passes-and-zapped-the-ship’s-electronics

https://defensesystems.com/articles/2017/05/12/fakeew.aspx?m=1

Aegis Combat System is a far bigger and more powerful EW platform in itself. That aircraft will be toast in an actual EW exchange.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

LMAO @ his range "estimate" of 5,600 miles. The JL-3's range is not a millimetre shorter than the Trident D5, and very likely a fair bit longer.

The 5600 miles figure was given by The Diplomat, most likely an arbitrarily random number pulled out of their a$$.

According to China's reliable information, the JL-3 is about 50% longer ranged than the original JL-2, and it can carry up to ten 250KT MIRV nuclear warheads.

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

According to China's reliable information, the JL-3 is about 50% longer ranged than the original JL-2, and it can carry up to ten 250KT MIRV nuclear warheads.

50% longer range than the JL-2 (which is claimed to have a range of 7200km) is still too short. 10,800km range won't reach the US from the SCS. Maybe that's the range with the full 10 MIRV payload; if so, then lightening the payload to 6 or so warheads should still deliver an acceptable level of devastation while getting the range up to 14,000+km.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

50% longer range than the JL-2 (which is claimed to have a range of 7200km) is still too short. 10,800km range won't reach the US from the SCS. Maybe that's the range with the full 10 MIRV payload; if so, then lightening the payload to 6 or so warheads should still deliver an acceptable level of devastation while getting the range up to 14,000+km.

The original JL-2 could carry up to three MIRV nuclear warheads with a range about 8000KM.

With a single warhead, the JL-2 can exceed 10000KM.

The 12000KM range will be a full payload for the JL-3 with up to ten 250KT MIRV nuclear warheads.

 

[Aasimkhan]

DF-21D is big on hype but in a war, it won’t work. I’ve seen US experts discuss how vulnerable it is in a war and they already have multiple options to disable that missile. DF-21D is more of a propaganda weapon than an actually effective weapon in a real war.



An attack on the US is an attack on
NATO. It’s so stupid, not even the CCP will do it. The West has all the economic, financial, technological, military advantages and an unmatched global alliance network.

And yet your so called NATO has miserably failed in Afghanistan in spite of 18 years of war. NATO may be good but its not God. People have been made to believe that NATO is impregnable but actually it is not. That LITTLE ROCKET MAN of North Korea daily piisses on the grave of trump and Trump can do fcuk all to stop him.

 

[Broccoli]

The 12000KM range will be a full payload for the JL-3 with up to ten 250KT MIRV nuclear warheads.

According to who? As far I know Chinese military has never revealed how many and what kinda warheads their missiles carry.

 

[Figaro]

The Spy-6 is in production, and the PLA has nothing that approaches the NIFCA-CA battle network.

The Burke’s are superior in almost every way. It’s defensive suite of missiles is far superior. The Spy-6/Spy-1 networked to NIFCA-CA is far superior, and when the Maritime Strike Tomahawk reaches IOC it will outrange the Type 55 in antisurface warfare.

And when the SM-6 Block Ib achieves IOC, it will be the most formidable dual capable anti-air/antiship missile in the world. The current SM-6 Block Ia reaches out 250-300 miles in the anti/antiship role. The Block Ib replaces the Ia’s 13.5in rocket motor with a 21in rocket motor thereby extending its range and speed significantly, likely out to the 400-500 mile range.

The SM-6 Block Ib combined with the Spy-6 radar and NIFC-CA network will give the US Navy the capability to control huge swathes of air and sea space. And the Type 55 has nothing that compares to this capability. Nothing...

The Type 55 can’t match the Burkes. It doesn’t have the networking or suite of weapon systems to do it.

Why are you listing only the specs of the Arleigh Burke and not those of the 055? If you want a fair comparison, list out both of them. Most US naval observers put the 055 on par with the Arleigh Burkes ... not propaganda, just fact.

According to who? As far I know Chinese military has never revealed how many and what kinda warheads their missiles carry.

I havent seen any information about the JL-3 specs either.