JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]

[Windjammer]

 

[MIRauf]

No, it's only the export designation of the same missile. Why do you think?

Above in response to question by:

Tair-Lahoti said:

Is PL-15 shorter than pl-12?
======
Deino,

Wording of this post is the cause of confusion, I read this as that PL-15 is the export designation of PL-12, while your post afterwords says the SD-10 is the export designation of PL-12.

PS: I do know that SD-10 ( export ) is PL-12, PL-15E is the designation for PL-15.

 

[Tamiyah]

Above in response to question by:

Tair-Lahoti said:

Is PL-15 shorter than pl-12?
======
Deino,

Wording of this post is the cause of confusion, I read this as that PL-15 is the export designation of PL-12, while your post afterwords says the SD-10 is the export designation of PL-12.

PS: I do know that SD-10 ( export ) is PL-12, PL-15E is the designation for PL-15.

Don't ask him about his reply he get annoyed even though his reply was very confusing and misleading.

 

[siegecrossbow]

JF 17s of Myanmar AF with PL5E2, SD 10A and C 802AK.

View attachment 682559View attachment 682560View attachment 682561

First time I’ve seen a JF-17 carrying SD-10 without wingtip missiles.

 

[Xone]

First time I’ve seen a JF-17 carrying SD-10 without wingtip missiles.

Hit at the first sight, no need to go near, and do not let others get into a dog fight.

 

[Marker]

After successful integration of RD-93MA engines in JF-17 Block 3, PAF may upgrade all RD-93s into RD-93MAs.

Russia will definitely offer such upgradation kit for older RD-93s, as they did offer to India for AL-31s.

 

[Talon]

 

[Clairvoyant]

After successful integration of RD-93MA engines in JF-17 Block 3, PAF may upgrade all RD-93s into RD-93MAs.

Russia will definitely offer such upgradation kit for older RD-93s, as they did offer to India for AL-31s.

May I ask as to when was the RD. 93MA successfully integrated?

 

[Marker]

May I ask as to when was the RD. 93MA successfully integrated?

I never stated that "RD-93MA was successfully integrated".

 

[The Raven]

I never stated that "RD-93MA was successfully integrated".

Yes you did.

After successful integration of RD-93MA engines in JF-17 Block 3, PAF may upgrade all RD-93s into RD-93MAs.

Russia will definitely offer such upgradation kit for older RD-93s, as they did offer to India for AL-31s.

 

[Air Wolf]

Yes you did.

No he didn't. RIP English comprehension. He is referring to a future scenario where it might happen.

 

[JamD]

View attachment 684021

If I am not wrong that is the first picture of the NAF roundel on the JF-17.

 

[Avicenna]

If I am not wrong that is the first picture of the NAF roundel on the JF-17.

Yes.

Looks tastier than some nice Jollof.

 

[The Raven]

No he didn't. RIP English comprehension. He is referring to a future scenario where it might happen.

Maybe it's Pakistani English, but if you say...

After successful integration of RD-93MA engines in JF-17 Block 3, PAF may upgrade all RD-93s into RD-93MAs.

...it implies an event that has already occurred. It may suffice for colloquial verbal use, but in a forum where it's all text based communication, it needs to be made clearer.

If you were correcting for English comprehension, the correct term would have been...

If the RD-93MA is successfully integrated in the JF-17...

English lesson over, return to meaningless speculation.

 

[Dreamer.]

Perhaps you should just accept that you misunderstood his post and move on, rather than give (wrong) english lectures. Other people read the same post in text and understood it correctly. Sometimes one can misread or misinterpret someone else's words and it's no big deal, so no need to insist on your mistake.