JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]

[Marker]

Any idea about the attachments on the sides of his helmet? Doesn't seem normal.

Pakistani version of JHMS!!!! On live trial.

 

[Ali_Baba]

The JF17 Block II cockpit does not seem to have differed much from Block I cockpit. It would be interesting to see what they do with Block III, single piece large MFD as seems the trend, or the 3-piece from Block II to save on costs .. Lets see.

 

[mshan44]

 

[Metal 0-1]

Any idea about the attachments on the sides of his helmet? Doesn't seem normal.

Just shadows and grey shade nothing special.

 

[MastanKhan]

Hi,

This here is a very interesting video by an F35 pilot. I would like the young pakistanis to listen carefully to what he is saying---.

This video links itself by default of being about an aircraft that was inferior to the current F16 at the time of its inception---I am not talking about the JF17---but the F35---.

This is a gem pf a video.

It then also in-advertantly by default sheds light on the J20 program---as to why the J20 being developed without the right engine---.

 

[The Eagle]

 

[MastanKhan]

Hi,

This here is a very interesting video by an F35 pilot. I would like the young pakistanis to listen carefully to what he is saying---.

This video links itself by default of being about an aircraft that was inferior to the current F16 at the time of its inception---I am not talking about the JF17---but the F35---.

This is a gem pf a video.

It then also in-advertantly by default sheds light on the J20 program---as to why the J20 being developed without the right engine---.

Hi,

If the readers remember how the critics bashed the J20 and still have not stopped at it---just because it is flying with an " supposedly" underpower engine.

These kids don't understand and don't know that there is more to flying an aircraft at mach 2 or super cruise capability---.

The electronics side of the aircraft---the stealth capability of the aircraft---the cutting edge EW package---the flight parameters of the aircraft have become more important than speed and dash capabilities---. And testing these options and pilot training takes a long long time---as explained in the video---.

In the past---when the first aircraft of a new design flew---it was better than what it was replacing---right from the gitgo---. It was expected and anticipated that it would be better.

The F35---otoh threw a monkey wrench in the minds of the analysts---. To many of them---it appeared to show incompetency by the manufacturer / designer but only if they knew what was to come.

Even very well known analysts and critics did not understand what was to come.

 

[GriffinsRule]

Hi,

This here is a very interesting video by an F35 pilot. I would like the young pakistanis to listen carefully to what he is saying---.

This video links itself by default of being about an aircraft that was inferior to the current F16 at the time of its inception---I am not talking about the JF17---but the F35---.

This is a gem pf a video.

It then also in-advertantly by default sheds light on the J20 program---as to why the J20 being developed without the right engine---.

Something to keep in mind when discussing LCA/Tejas as well.

 

[MastanKhan]

Something to keep in mind when discussing LCA/Tejas as well.

Hi,

Yessir---that is the other side of the coin---.

 

[MastanKhan]

Hi,

Millenium 7 is at it again---his favorite topic now---DSI-----F35---JF17---J10---and why back to this topic---because the background of the person who designed it---.

 

[MastanKhan]

Hi,

And here is a video on the JF17 in Spanish---use CC to translate---.

JF17 is getting hot in south america.

 

[Nomad40]

@MastanKhan the short answer is that there is no G limit.

G is acceleration of gravity the faster you accelerate the more G you can pull just like the car.

G force is impacted by Configuration of the air craft, Gross weight and attitude of the aircraft and we have to keep in mind the whole airframe is impacted by G and not just the wings.

FCS limits the G on the Jf-17---once override you can literally go to the extent of ripping your wing of and turning your brain in to mush. The structural Limit is more of the JF-17 but it is regulated at +8/-3 this is done because of biology and Increasing air frame life.

Strengthen a single section of the wing will have not a drastic impact on the capability of the G load the wing can handle but might be able to bare more repeated stresses caused by the already rated G for the aircraft.

I am not an aeronautical engineer and nether am I a trained mechanic I just read books and talk to a lot of credible people.

 

[MastanKhan]

@MastanKhan the short answer is that there is no G limit.

G is acceleration of gravity the faster you accelerate the more G you can pull just like the car.

G force is impacted by Configuration of the air craft, Gross weight and attitude of the aircraft and we have to keep in mind the whole airframe is impacted by G and not just the wings.

FCS limits the G on the Jf-17---once override you can literally go to the extent of ripping your wing of and turning your brain in to mush. The structural Limit is more of the JF-17 but it is regulated at +8/-3 this is done because of biology and Increasing air frame life.

Strengthen a single section of the wing will have not a drastic impact on the capability of the G load the wing can handle but might be able to bare more repeated stresses caused by the already rated G for the aircraft.

I am not an aeronautical engineer and nether am I a trained mechanic I just read books and talk to a lot of credible people.

Hi,

You made me laugh at your answer---. Just trying to hold the ear from around the head---hehn.

 

[Nomad40]

Hi,

You made me laugh at your answer---. Just trying to hold the ear from around the head---hehn.

Im glad you had a good laugh.

 

[MastanKhan]

Im glad you had a good laugh.

Hi,

I liked the ingenuity of your answer---