What's new

JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]


ANALYSIS OF AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ORIGINAL
AND MODIFIED WING-STRAKE ARRANGEMENT OF JF-17

THUNDER AIRCRAFT
A. Maqsood, J. Masud, O. A. Qazi
Department of Aerospace Engineering, College of Aeronautical Engineering,
National University ofSciences and Technology, Risalpur 24090, Pakistan​

SUMMARY

The aim of the research is to carry out the comparative studies based on the change in aerodynamicbehavior of original and modified configurations of JF-17 wing-strake arrangement. Two geometries are analyzedto observe variation with the size of strake. The original configuration has comparatively smaller strake than themodified geometry. Both geometries are analyzed using a shareware software PANAIR based on linearized
potential flow theory to fulfill the baseline requirement of the project.

Figure-1-Isometric-View-of-Original-Geometry.png


INTRODUCTION

Even in this era of computer technology solving complete Navier-Stokes equations for an
aerodynamic problem for a complex geometryduring design phase is computationally very
expensive. Therefore there is a need for a simplifiedmodel that allows for an easy grasp of dominantaerodynamic effects. The classical model of a thinviscous boundary layer along a body’s surfacesurrounded by a mainly inviscid flow field has produced important engineering results. Thisapproach requires first the solution of the inviscidflow to obtain the pressure field and consequentlythe forces such as lift, induced drag and moments.

Then a solution of the viscous flow in the thin boundary layer allows for the calculation of the skinfriction effects. This methodology has been usedsuccessfully over years for most of the airplane andmarine vessel designs. With the development ofcomputer speed and capacity, the inviscid flow fieldover complex and detailed geometries like airplane,space shuttles, cars etc can be computed by means ofnumerical panel techniques.

A readily available shareware panel method codeA502i is a pilot version of PANAIR code developedjointly by Boeing and NASA. Modeling andmeshing were done in preprocessing softwareGambit. This research enabled us to establish theaccuracy of the available panel code A502i and alsostudy the effects of different flight conditions onaerodynamic characteristics of an aircraft withoutcarrying out the wind tunnel tests or solvingcomplete Navier-Stokes equations.

The analysis carried out in PANAIR isbased on potential flow theory. Both configurations
were tested at Mach# 0.6, 0.8, 1.4 and 1.6. Theangles of attack specified are 0,5,10 and 15 degrees


IA66M2Q.png


in PANAIR. The angles of attack specified are0,5,10 and 15 The parameters like Coefficient of lift,drag and pitching moment were of major interestand are plotted against different angle of attackskeeping the mach number same for comparison ofboth geometries.

Following are the baseline objectives of the research carried out

(a) The prediction of forces and momentsdeveloped over both configurations in subsonic and
supersonic regimes.

(b) Visualization of flow over the surfaces of both configurations.

RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The computed results in subsonic andsupersonic flow conditions for coefficient of lift,drag and pitching moments are compared for bothconfigurations. The pressure distributions over thesurfaces for different flight conditions are alsoshown. The graphs are plotted to have anapproximation for the changes in various aerodynamic parameters because of themodification.

The basic flow field around the modeledgeometries consists of free stream flow beingmodified by the presence of the aircraft bodies. Theflow adjacent to the aircraft generally follows theaircraft contour and as per the limitation of potential
flow, no flow separation is expected to occur even at high angle of attacks. The pressure variation atsubsonic flows at lower angle of attacks is shown for
both configurations at M# 0.6. Since the present analysis is based on
potential flow assumptions therefore the regions of locally high or low velocity can easily be identifiedby corresponding regions of low or high Cp values.

As the angle of attack increases, the flowaccordingly accelerates around the aircraftincreasingly larger region of negative Cp on theupper surface of the wings can be witnessed.

Conclusion from the Results

It can be concluded from the results that the major purpose of the wing-strake modification is toincrease the instability of the aircraft. Initially JF-17
was not having fly-by-wire system but now thesystem has been introduced in the aircraft. Thepurpose of this aerodynamic modification is narrated
below.


In the beginning, if we want to trim the aircraft at higher angles of attack, large deflection in horizontal tail was required which resulted in higher trim and
pressure drags contributed to the aircraft. After this modification, if we want to trim the aircraft at a higher angle of attack, the drag produced by the
horizontal tail will be less and as a cumulative factor, overall drag reduction will happen.


Source : https://www.researchgate.net/public...-STRAKE_ARRANGEMENT_OF_JF-17_THUNDER_AIRCRAFT


@Windjammer @Areesh @Arsalan @Imran Khan @The Eagle @Oscar @Myth_buster_1 @araz @DrWatson775 @Falcon26 @airmarshal @The Eagle @Flight of falcon @doorstar @RIWWIR @Irfan Baloch @CHACHA"G"
 
INTRODUCTION

We have dedicated section for JF-17 and then sticky threads w.r.t subject as such to cover that too of a study being carried out in 2008. A lot has been changed.
 
We have dedicated section for JF-17 and then sticky threads w.r.t subject as such to cover that too of a study being carried out in 2008. A lot has been changed.

Well, You should have kept it separate. It catches the eyes of enthusiast like me who want to spread the connectivity and fusion of Acedemic Exposure to Defence technologies especially at University Level.

many Pakistani Students visit PDF and they will love to understand what they can achive with MATLAB/PSPICE etc. in real world.
 
What part did JF-17 play on the day of 27th feb skirmish? It's now very clear that F-16 shot down the Mig-21 and allegedly an SU-30 as well. AM shahid lateef is quite an informed person regarding JF-17 and according to his remarks jF-17 played a decent role.....any remarks from senior members?
JF17 were deployed on an air to air role. sadly these two Indian aircraft didn't come their way else the result would have been the same. Shahid Lateef is a personal friend and we share the same musjid and lives at 5 minutes from me. He told me recently that the block 3 will be far superior to our f16s. remember he was one of the guys that started the jf17 project. He resigned because he argued with Zardari who wanted to shut down the jf17 programme due to American orders.
 
JF17 were deployed on an air to air role. sadly these two Indian aircraft didn't come their way else the result would have been the same. Shahid Lateef is a personal friend and we share the same musjid and lives at 5 minutes from me. He told me recently that the block 3 will be far superior to our f16s. remember he was one of the guys that started the jf17 project. He resigned because he argued with Zardari who wanted to shut down the jf17 programme due to American orders.

Shahid Lateef should be made the project director for Project Azm.
 
Well, You should have kept it separate. It catches the eyes of enthusiast like me who want to spread the connectivity and fusion of Acedemic Exposure to Defence technologies especially at University Level.

many Pakistani Students visit PDF and they will love to understand what they can achive with MATLAB/PSPICE etc. in real world.

can't keep every study separate but for the matter that visiting students can find most at one place rather scattered information.
 
JF17 were deployed on an air to air role. sadly these two Indian aircraft didn't come their way else the result would have been the same. Shahid Lateef is a personal friend and we share the same musjid and lives at 5 minutes from me. He told me recently that the block 3 will be far superior to our f16s. remember he was one of the guys that started the jf17 project. He resigned because he argued with Zardari who wanted to shut down the jf17 programme due to American orders.
Block 3 will be light weight fighter with lesser weapons load and inferior amraams. How will it be superior to F-16 . Even in range and maneuvering
 
We have JF-17 Block-III sticky thread with almost every possible development or analysis based upon the pattern of new tech, weapons and even any changes. Members are advised to move on to that thread and before posting any questions, may please go through the thread that seniors/aware members have put a lot of information with due efforts.

Regards,
 
Block 3 will be light weight fighter with lesser weapons load and inferior amraams. How will it be superior to F-16 . Even in range and maneuvering
Well u r the expert and you know more than the guys that help put together the fighter so I mean what does he know. I will get him to call u shall I
 
Block 3 will be light weight fighter with lesser weapons load and inferior amraams. How will it be superior to F-16 . Even in range and maneuvering
Block-3 will be far far more superior then F-16 block-52 in term of avionics/radars/ECM/EW (AESA+IRST, all digital quadrupal fly by wire system etc etc) lesser weapon payload as you said its light weight fighter jet, in fact weapon payload increases as compare to Block-1/2 3800 kg to 4500 kg and have better long range BVR (PL-15) then AMRAAM better precision guided munitions (ground attack missiles/glide bombs/anti ship missiles/dump bombs etc etc) @alee92nawaz :crazy::crazy::crazy:
 
Block-3 will be far far more superior then F-16 block-52 in term of avionics/radars/ECM/EW (AESA+IRST, all digital quadrupal fly by wire system etc etc) lesser weapon payload as you said its light weight fighter jet, in fact weapon payload increases as compare to Block-1/2 3800 kg to 4500 kg and have better long range BVR (PL-15) then AMRAAM better precision guided munitions (ground attack missiles/glide bombs/anti ship missiles/dump bombs etc etc) @alee92nawaz :crazy::crazy::crazy:
IRST isn't gonna be there
 
Back
Top Bottom