What's new

JF-17 Block III Multirole Fighter

Status
Not open for further replies.
IMG_0394.JPG


Can someone translate this pic ??

Block 3 ??? ;) willl block 3 have any structural changes ?? The only one being talked about was new hard points

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-2rJ_AKkN...XvyfHvf3p7NjsBfrQQCPcB/s1600/FC-1_stealth.jpg

A recent report (November 2016) suggested that 611 Institute is studying a semi-stealth concept of FC-1 (JF-17 Block IV?) to further extend its export potential. The aircraft might have certain stealth features such as a redesigned stealth nose with a one-piece F-22 style canopy.
 
Last edited:
.
View attachment 406392

Can someone translate this pic ??

Block 3 ??? ;) willl block 3 have any structural changes ?? The only one being talked about was new hard points

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-2rJ_AKkN...XvyfHvf3p7NjsBfrQQCPcB/s1600/FC-1_stealth.jpg

A recent report (November 2016) suggested that 611 Institute is studying a semi-stealth concept of FC-1 (JF-17 Block IV?) to further extend its export potential. The aircraft might have certain stealth features such as a redesigned stealth nose with a one-piece F-22 style canopy.

That's an old fanboy art.
 
. .
IMG_0395.JPG

IMG_0396.JPG

IMG_0397.JPG


These Pics are original from a PAC video plus I think Ldp pylon will look something like the one above
 
Last edited:
. . .
Personally i think

AESA
NEw engine with TVC
5th generation avionics
redesigned airframe
e.g Diamond nose
reduced RCS
IRST
PL-21D as Primary BVR or indegenous BVR
ECM like Spectra


and many more unknown goodies

---------- Post added at 06:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:22 PM ----------



A dedicated thread for JFT III as it is only 4 years far frrom reality
thats speculation not fact
 
.
thats speculation not fact
Absolutely, correct.... too much speculation and wish list. Wait and see is best approach at this point. This is just 3rd iteration and there will be a lot more more thereafter including possible engine replacement. We are still at very early development lifecycle. Kaizen approach is always the best; you dont want too many changes which will have their own side effects.

However the ultimate goal is to have a plane that matches capabilities of gripen both in terms of egronomics, operations albeit at much lower cost; airframe will evolve further to leveraging more composites and a cleaner frame which uses the body for lift as well.

Note, i am not referring to f-16 in terms of capabilities because that was never the goal; if however it comes close to it then even better.
 
Last edited:
.
i am just expecting AESA, updated engine, and 2 additional hard points under the fuselage
 
.
Is JF17 Thunder blk 1 & 2 both equipped with AESA radar.
 
Last edited:
. . . .
Block three is going to have aesa mach2.0 and irst confirmed

Bhai

AESA radar + Helment Mounted Display + IRST + Mach 2.0 + Better Avionics + More payload and Block 3 is truly going to be latest 4++ generation fighter jet.
 
.
Bhai

AESA radar + Helment Mounted Display + IRST + Mach 2.0 + Better Avionics + More payload and Block 3 is truly going to be latest 4++ generation fighter jet.
Mach 2 not happening ... design limitations ...

Although TWR will improve which is more important than speed
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom