Shah_Deu
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2019
- Messages
- 691
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
F-16s are good but value for money? Dependency on US sucks really. As much as i love PAF flying F-16s, I hate the bitter fact that it comes with strings attached. Like still paying so much money, and the machines are unable to deliver nukes? Infact even the old ones after upgrades have been rendered impotent if open media sources are to be believed.The F-16s will be the exception, always. For $4 billion US you can add 18 new Block-72 and upgrade our existing fleet to F-16V standards. That's a net-addition of 90+ fighters equipped with AESA radars.
So in that case, the PAF will probably think, "okay, let's delay Project Azm a bit" because it would have 4-5 units of high-end fighters to hold the fort down against anything the IAF throws at them. But no other import is going to get that consideration.
Furthermore, all these toys from muricans seems like carrots at the beginning but are turned to sticks whenever we need them most! What about the already ordered AH-1Zs? and we are dreaming of F-16Vs and Blocks 70s.
A reliable dealer that provides slightly blunt swords is still better than a unreliable dealer of sharp ones but which could turn its back anytime! We live in dangerous times, we need reliability in our supply chains so our planners can plan for the unexpected in advance.
The bitter reality is, the US has defined China as its next foe and India as its partner in crime. No matter how low we bend before uncle sam, the US strategic policy doesnt allow us to have that strategic edge over India. The earlier our planners get over this fact and look things from this prism, the better! Even if we get F-16s, they would be used to blackmail us to get americas wishes fulfilled, forget about countering India. My 10 cents.
Last edited: