Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually emphasis was on: SP3?
Serial production build - third stage of assembly.
All SSt designs are like the SSt and all the DSt would be like the DSt.
Some people here predicted from beginning that many would be disappointed. I think what's important is what the new block does add to the capability rather than what it doesn't.
The prospective radar for Block-III is capable of attacking 4 targets with BVR missiles. That leads me to believe that Block-III is capable of carrying 4 BVR missiles. Otherwise, there is no need to fit this radar onto JF-17 Block-III aircraft.JF-17 Block 3 definitely needs at least 4 BVRAAM missiles if not more. 4 planes networked with AWACS could in theory be a unstoppable A2A group.
I think he is not pleased with DSt (Dual Seat) & SSt (Single Seat) being similar to previous blocks.
For some reason, the PAF's JF-17s have yet to employ dual ejector racks. So, if they're indeed strengthening the wing-mounted hardpoints, we shouldn't stop at just 4 BVRAAM, it should be 6 at least (ideally 8).The prospective radar for Block-III is capable of attacking 4 targets with BVR missiles. That leads me to believe that Block-III is capable of carrying 4 BVR missiles. Otherwise, there is no need to fit this radar onto JF-17 Block-III aircraft.
I think he is not pleased with DSt (Dual Seat) & SSt (Single Seat) being similar to previous blocks.
*sigh*Some people here predicted from beginning that many would be disappointed. I think what's important is what the new block does add to the capability rather than what it doesn't.
No mig-29 style extension of spine then? @Bilal Khan (Quwa)
For some reason, the PAF's JF-17s have yet to employ dual ejector racks. So, if they're indeed strengthening the wing-mounted hardpoints, we shouldn't stop at just 4 BVRAAM, it should be 6 at least (ideally 8).
For some reason, the PAF's JF-17s have yet to employ dual ejector racks. So, if they're indeed strengthening the wing-mounted hardpoints, we shouldn't stop at just 4 BVRAAM, it should be 6 at least (ideally 8).
*sigh*
I cant stop laughing.
I think he is not pleased with DSt (Dual Seat) & SSt (Single Seat) being similar to previous blocks.
As per a genuine source at AMF, the block 3 will carry six IF needed. Four on DER and one each on two hardpoints.
Even block 2 and B can carry 4 but they are rarely carried.
Dont expect a significant change in 'shape' but marked improvement in aerodynamics from block 2. Quantum. @Dazzler
The prospective radar for Block-III is capable of attacking 4 targets with BVR missiles. That leads me to believe that Block-III is capable of carrying 4 BVR missiles. Otherwise, there is no need to fit this radar onto JF-17 Block-III aircraft.
sir JF-17 inspired by F-16 which able carry 6 AAM, but remember sir as F-16 or light weight fighter jet project same as our JF-17, i think early version of F-16 till ( Block-15) had have carry 4 AAM same as our JF-17 as for dual racks they also increases a drag hence overall performance parameter of JF-17 and 8 AAM are suited for Heavy air superiority jets like F-15/Su-27 @Bilal Khan (Quwa)For some reason, the PAF's JF-17s have yet to employ dual ejector racks. So, if they're indeed strengthening the wing-mounted hardpoints, we shouldn't stop at just 4 BVRAAM, it should be 6 at least (ideally 8).