Ultima Thule
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2012
- Messages
- 16,725
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
spreading a false rumors with no backup, this is serious thread not some fan boys threadChahe woh vese hi kehraha ho ap to serious hi ho gaye.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
spreading a false rumors with no backup, this is serious thread not some fan boys threadChahe woh vese hi kehraha ho ap to serious hi ho gaye.
I Understand Sir, My apologies from him. Next time I'll make sure nobody spread a false rumor. Bache ki jaan lenge kya ap?spreading a false rumors with no backup, this is serious thread not some fan boys thread
i think 01 sir .I have a question for everyone that what could be the possible number for Block-III prototype? For example 2P for Block-II and then we have seen BCxxxx for Block-B.
i think 01 sir .
So, the initial batch will be equipped with PD radars while later ones will have the AESA? Is this due to a selection or supplier issue or both?
I would assume it would be equal to or less than the prototypes made for JF17B. The reason being that JF17B's prototypes can be used to test for many of the internal avionics like the AESA radar. For the flight characteristics however the block III would need to be tested with its own airframe(which has reportedly seen some changes). That's just my guess.I have a question for everyone that what could be the possible number for Block-III prototype? For example 2P for Block-II and then we have seen BCxxxx for Block-B.
Boss, 01 could be the last number to say like 1st plane of block-III .... but . . .I mean P2 stands for Bloock-II & then we have seen Block-B like BCxx0x so what could be the possible tail number for Block-III prototype?
and no Sir please.
Alternatively if the wing tips are strengthened it gives us the possibility of loading PL12 on it just like the 16s do with the AMRAAMSStrengthen jf outer wing to add additional pylon carry one sd-10
View attachment 579235
View attachment 579236
i think 01 sir .
I would assume it would be equal to or less than the prototypes made for JF17B. The reason being that JF17B's prototypes can be used to test for many of the internal avionics like the AESA radar. For the flight characteristics however the block III would need to be tested with its own airframe(which has reportedly seen some changes). That's just my guess.
The tail number for JF-17B prototype flying in PAF is 17-601. This leads me to believe that either the aircraft will actually enter squadron service or perhaps will be retained as a test aircraft. The BCXXXXX are more like serial or part numbers and we even saw two different numbers on the same aircraft in production. Block III tail numbers will be something like 20-301 onwards if the trend is anything to go by.
Interesting to note:
F-16BM: 82-601 - 14-627
F-16D: 10-801 - 10-806 (800 series perhaps to differentiate between older and new blocks with substantial changes)
JF-17B: 17-601
FT-7P: 88-601 - 90-619
FT-7PG: 02-681 - 02-687
The Mirage series, in service for much longer, has a different numbering scheme, but the latest 3 jets inducted in PAF clearly show that twin-seat jets have their numbers in the 600 series.
is block 3 in production?Thank you for your input. This is what I meant by PT No. that you can see on vertical stabilizer.
View attachment 579263 View attachment 579266
is block 3 in production?
is block 3 in production?