What's new

Japan approves 5 years more funding for U.S. military presence as China, Russia and North Korea threats loom large

You know why you have so many military bases in Europe but not in France? You really thinks japanese would need your protection if they really have a choice? You are naiive..
Japan needs a partner ally. France is in the EU so it has Germany and other EU countries as top power. For Japan, that choice is either Russia, China, or the US. Pretty easy choice to keep it with the US.
 
Japan needs a partner ally. France is in the EU so it has Germany and other EU countries as top power. For Japan, that choice is either Russia, China, or the US. Pretty easy choice to keep it with the US.
Russia, China and Koreas are Japan's next door neighbors and biggest trading partners, energy suppliers and biggest market, US is oceans away.
 

Japan approves 5 years more funding for U.S. military presence as China, Russia and North Korea threats loom large​

BY LUCY CRAFT
MARCH 25, 2022 / 10:57 AM / CBS NEWS

Tokyo — Japanese government spending to cover the cost of hosting American troops — an issue which became contentious during the Trump administration — has been finalized by Japan's parliament. The new $8.6 billion, five-year, host-nation support budget takes effect in April and runs through 2027. It reflects a growing emphasis on integration between the two countries' forces and a focus on joint response and deterrence amid rising threats from China, North Korea and Russia.


Donald Trump had reportedly demanded that Japan quadruple its funding to support U.S. military bases in the country to $8 billion annually, apparently even threatening to withdraw American troops if Tokyo refused.

The budget approved on Friday represents a more moderate increase on the previous funding package, with almost $616 million more allocated over the five years, but it is also notable for its attempt to shift the focus to bilateral defense.

Once known as a "sympathy" budget, host-nation support has been controversial in Japan, with public uproar over spending on things like golf courses and bowling alleys, and more broadly on the impact of the large American troop presence on Japanese communities. But Tokyo has stopped calling it a "sympathy" and now refers to the cost-sharing as an important element of deepening the bilateral alliance.

Japan frequently cites a 2004 U.S. Department of Defense report which calculated that Tokyo covered nearly 75% of the cost of stationing U.S. troops in the country, compared to the 40% of costs covered by South Korea to keep American forces in that country.


As China pursues territorial claims in the East China Sea, site of the disputed Japanese-controlled Senkaku islands (known in China as Daioyu), Japan has ramped up joint training not only with the U.S., but with Australia, Britain and other partners.

The U.S. has about 55,000 troops deployed in Japan, stationed at more than half a dozen bases and other facilities.


No surprise there, the future looks very shaky and they need all the help they can get.
The problem is for their simp rulers they're getting themselves involved in all sorts of political conflicts they can ill afford. Of course they have China, but they've angered Russia.
 

Japan approves 5 years more funding for U.S. military presence as China, Russia and North Korea threats loom large​

BY LUCY CRAFT
MARCH 25, 2022 / 10:57 AM / CBS NEWS

Tokyo — Japanese government spending to cover the cost of hosting American troops — an issue which became contentious during the Trump administration — has been finalized by Japan's parliament. The new $8.6 billion, five-year, host-nation support budget takes effect in April and runs through 2027. It reflects a growing emphasis on integration between the two countries' forces and a focus on joint response and deterrence amid rising threats from China, North Korea and Russia.


Donald Trump had reportedly demanded that Japan quadruple its funding to support U.S. military bases in the country to $8 billion annually, apparently even threatening to withdraw American troops if Tokyo refused.

The budget approved on Friday represents a more moderate increase on the previous funding package, with almost $616 million more allocated over the five years, but it is also notable for its attempt to shift the focus to bilateral defense.

Once known as a "sympathy" budget, host-nation support has been controversial in Japan, with public uproar over spending on things like golf courses and bowling alleys, and more broadly on the impact of the large American troop presence on Japanese communities. But Tokyo has stopped calling it a "sympathy" and now refers to the cost-sharing as an important element of deepening the bilateral alliance.

Japan frequently cites a 2004 U.S. Department of Defense report which calculated that Tokyo covered nearly 75% of the cost of stationing U.S. troops in the country, compared to the 40% of costs covered by South Korea to keep American forces in that country.


As China pursues territorial claims in the East China Sea, site of the disputed Japanese-controlled Senkaku islands (known in China as Daioyu), Japan has ramped up joint training not only with the U.S., but with Australia, Britain and other partners.

The U.S. has about 55,000 troops deployed in Japan, stationed at more than half a dozen bases and other facilities.

$8.6b for 5y, that means $1.72b per year. That is very cheap, a good deal for Japan.

Without US umbrella, Japan would spend $50 billion per year more. Minimum.

Vietnam should seek such a good deal with the US. Without hosting US military bases.
 
No surprise there, the future looks very shaky and they need all the help they can get.
The problem is for their simp rulers they're getting themselves involved in all sorts of political conflicts they can ill afford. Of course they have China, but they've angered Russia.
Hostile neighbors
CSF965.gif
 
It's not smart for a small country to go nuclear, big countries like Russia and China can withstand several rounds of nuclear attacks but tiny countries like Japan and Korea can vanished from the face of the earth in a matter of minutes if not seconds if being nuclearly bombed.



Not really true that.

Actually it is even smarter for a smaller country to go nuclear as that alleviates their conventional inferiority.

Say Japan is somehow able to land 30 ICBMs on China, with 6 100kt thermonuclear warheads each then there will not be much left of China then as it will have lost all it's largest cities, ports, dams, major power generation centers etc.
 
---start--
TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — Only 15% of Taiwanese think their country should be close to China, less than half of the figure recorded the previous year, according to the results of an opinion poll published by the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association (JTEA) Friday (March 18).

The main topic of the annual poll covering 2021 was the Taiwanese attitude toward Japan, CNA reported. A record level of 46% of respondents said Japan was the country Taiwan should be the closest to from now on.

While 31% of people in the previous survey named China, the new 2021 edition found sympathy for the communist neighbor had plunged by more than half to 15%, JTEA said.
---
https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4477685
 
Not really true that.

Actually it is even smarter for a smaller country to go nuclear as that alleviates their conventional inferiority.

Say Japan is somehow able to land 30 ICBMs on China, with 6 100kt thermonuclear warheads each then there will not be much left of China then as it will have lost all it's largest cities, ports, dams, major power generation centers etc.
And Japan will become a memory in human history, a sane person won't risk their very lives just to hurt a giant. besides, If Japan were really that brave and reckless, it wouldn't have surrendered in WW2
 
And Japan will become a memory in human history, a sane person won't risk their very lives just to hurt a giant.




The point is that this will make a much larger country think very careful about attacking it.

Of course Japanese won't fire off their missiles without a very serious situation for them.
 
---start---
Taipei – A new survey on Friday showed that 60% of Taiwanese consider Japan their favorite foreign country, the highest number since such surveys began in 2009.

According to the survey conducted by an investigative agency commissioned by Tokyo’s de facto embassy in Taipei, Japan was by far the most favored country among Taiwanese, with China ranking second with 5% and the United States third with 4%.

Japan also topped the list of countries or regions with which respondents believe Taiwan should develop a close relationship in the future with 46%, up 9 percentage points from the previous survey in 2018 to hit a record high.



In the same question, the US was chosen by 24%, up 9 points, and China by 15%, down 16 points, amid tense relations across the Straits.

The US overtook China as the country respondents considered most influential to Taiwan, with a record 58% choosing the US, up from 33% in 2018, compared to 25% choosing China , a sharp decrease from 45% in the previous survey.

A total of 13% chose Japan.

A record 70% of respondents said Taiwan-Japan relations are strong, while 77% said they felt an affinity for Japan, up from 70% in 2018.

The survey was conducted among a random sample of 1,068 Taiwanese adults aged 20 to 80 by phone or online from January 5 to 20.
---
https://worldrepublicnews.com/60-of-taiwanese-choose-japan-as-their-favorite-foreign-country/
 
The point is that this will make a much larger country think very careful about attacking it.

Of course Japanese won't fire off their missiles without a very serious situation for them.
This will make bigger nuclear powers more likely to launch nuclear attacks to make sure small nuclear countries got no chance to fight back, this is why most small countries, no matter how rich and developed they are, won't touch nuclear weapons with a 10 foot pole
 
This will make bigger nuclear powers more likely to launch nuclear attacks to make sure small nuclear countries got no chance to fight back, this is why most small countries, no matter how rich and developed they are, won't touch nuclear weapons with a 10 foot pole



SLBMs and road mobile TELs solve the problem for Japan.

No, the reason a lot of countries do not touch nuclear weapons is due to sanctions and threat of attacks from other nuclear powers on their nuclear infrastructure.

Pakistan got away with it because of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan as otherwise it would have been heavily sanctioned by the US and Europe in the 1980s.
 
---start---
MANILA – The defense chiefs of the Philippines and Japan have agreed to further strengthen cooperation in all areas.

Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana and Japanese Defense Minister Nobuo Kishi made this commitment during a video conference on Wednesday.

"Both officials noted the increasing activities between the two countries' militaries across all major services and agreed that the Philippines and Japan should further deepen cooperation in all areas," Department of National Defense (DND) spokesperson Arsenio Andolong said in a statement on Friday.

He added that both officials reaffirmed commitment to support the upcoming activities between "Philippine and Japanese defense establishments".

Lorenzana, Andolong said, also expressed his appreciation for Japan's continued support to the capability-upgrade program of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP).

He said the TC-90 aircraft donation from Tokyo is being highly utilized for the AFP's reconnaissance missions.

Meanwhile, Kishi noted that the transfer of radar systems to the Philippines is progressing smoothly.

Both officials also acknowledged the importance of cooperation in fighting the spread of infectious diseases in light of the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic.

Kishi also thanked Manila for its support and participation in the recently conducted virtual Japan-Asean Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) Program, which focused on the military's role in addressing the pandemic.

The two officials also discussed various regional security issues, including the situation in Southeast Asia, Korean Peninsula, and the South China Sea/West Philippine Sea (SCS/WPS) and East China Sea (ECS).

Expressing grave concern over unilateral actions in the SCS/WPS and ECS, both Lorenzana and Kishi underscored the need for all parties to uphold the principles of freedom of navigation and to exercise self-restraint in accordance with universally recognized principles of international law, specifically the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
---
https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1142560
 
Back
Top Bottom