Akasa
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2008
- Messages
- 7,227
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
As of right now, the J-11B is better in terms of airframe quality (more composite materials and better built quality = longer service life), versatility (fire both Chinese & Russian weapons) and some avionics systems (missile warning, wide angle holographic HUD etc.) . Su-30MKI has a better radar, Israeli ECW (& other foreign sub-systems) and perhaps better maneuverability (canard + TVC).
J-11B is better than the Su-30MKI's agility in terms of climb rate as well.
It's not only the canards and TVC that decide its maneuverability, but also the composites in its airframe and its thrust-to-weight ratio. J-11B has advantages in thrust-to-weight ratio and composites while Su-30MKI may have the edge in canards and TVC. But the J-15 will have canards.
Speaking of avionics, the J-11B's present radar can track and engage more targets than the Su-30MKI's radar. Both radars have around the same range, so the J-11B's ability to track and and engage more targets puts it ahead.
J-11B variants and J-15 will also be getting AESA radar.