What's new

Israel plays wargame assuming Iran has nuclear bomb

Fighter488

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 5, 2009
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
0
Israel plays wargame assuming Iran has nuclear bomb


(Reuters) - A nuclear-armed Iran would blunt Israel's military autonomy, a wargame involving former Israeli generals and diplomats has concluded, though some players predicted Tehran would also exercise restraint.

Sunday's event at a campus north of Tel Aviv followed other high-profile Iran simulations in Israel and the United States in recent months. But it broke new ground by assuming the existence of what both countries have pledged to prevent: an Iranian bomb.

"Iranian deterrence proved dizzyingly effective," Eitan Ben-Eliahu, a retired air force commander who played the Israeli defence minister, said in his summary of the 20-team meeting.

Though the wargame saw Iran declaring itself a nuclear power in 2011, the ensuing confrontations were by proxy, in Lebanon.

In one, emboldened Hezbollah guerrillas fired missiles at the Defence Ministry in Tel Aviv. That was followed by U.S. and Israeli intelligence findings that Iran had slipped radioactive materials to its Lebanese cohort, to assemble a crude device.

Neither move drew Israeli attacks, though Ben-Eliahu said his delegation had received discreet encouragement from Arab rivals of Iran to "go all the way" in retaliating.

Instead, Israel conferred with the United States, which publicly supported its ally's "right to self-defence" and mobilised military reinforcements for the region while quietly insisting the Israelis stand down to give crisis talks a chance.

"As far as the United States was concerned, Israel was trigger-happy. It sought to use the Hezbollah (missile) attack as justification for what the United States was told would be an all-out war," said Dan Kurtzer, a former U.S. ambassador to Tel Aviv who played President Barack Obama.

Kurtzer voiced satisfaction with his team's response to the "dirty bomb," which entailed cajoling U.N. Security Council powers into mounting an armed intervention against Hezbollah.

"Countries like China and Russia have their own terrorists, and don't want to see them getting nuclear weapons," he said.

"In certain circumstances, agile U.S. diplomacy can actually work in this region, and it ends up not only leaving Israel in check but it also ends up (with Washington) leading a willing international coalition."

STRATEGIC BALANCE

Those playing Iran and Hezbollah went as far as to question the very premise that Tehran would let the Lebanese guerrillas goad Israel into a potentially catastrophic fight, or give them nuclear know-how that would worry even sympathisers like Syria.

Aharon Zeevi-Farkash, a retired Israeli intelligence chief acting as Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, insisted Iran would regard its bomb as a means of "self-defence and strategic balance" -- an allusion to Israel's own, assumed atomic arsenal.

Such assessments are seldom voiced by Israel's rightist government, which describes a nuclear-armed Iran as a mortal danger. Where Israeli officials would once make veiled threats to strike Iran, now they often try to warn the West against accommodating their foe, which denies seeking atomic weapons.

In what appeared to signal government discomfort with the wargame, a senior Israeli defence official who had been due to attend withdrew at short notice. A Foreign Ministry spokesman said a written summary would be studied at government-level.

That left Tzipi Livni, the centrist head of Israel's opposition, as the most prominent observer of the IDC event.

"As leader of the free world, the United States has the responsibility of leading more effective sanctions that can turn around, absolutely, this shift from a process of stopping (Iran's nuclear aims) to a process of acceptance," she said.

While the simulation found no immediate international drive to tackle Iran, Kurtzer attributed this to passive factors such as U.S. war-fatigue and complained of a failure to address ramifications such as a nuclear arms race among Arab powers.

Some of the participants -- including those playing Israel, the Palestinians and Syria -- saw an opportunity for renewed Middle East peacemaking that might head off Iran's ascendancy.

"This was tactical, but of course tactics can often serve real strategic interests, both for us and for the Americans," said Zalman Shoval, a former Israeli ambassador to Washington who acted as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

(Editing by Samia Nakhoul)

Israel plays wargame assuming Iran has nuclear bomb | Reuters
 
.
Only if there could have been a technology which would have 100% success rate of shooting down Balastic missiles. The eq has hampered the Israeli case in ME. Its only a race against time. The best thing would be that Israeli comply with the Arabs and make peace with the Palestinians but how will the Palestinians forget all that barbarism, Highly Unlikely.

At-Last the cries of innocent women and children will be heared.
The Israeli Sun is loosing shine in the ME better to migrate and settle in US and Europe.
 
.
Yoo baby yoo.. So Israel has sensed that it is indeed going to happen. I feel the day is near when our brother Iran will develop power that will bring peace in the world and world will be more safer place than it is now. War was very much a possibility when balance of power between India and Pakistan was unequal.. and when Iran would develop Nuclear arsenal, it is ultimately going to bring peace to the this part of the world.
 
.
Yoo baby yoo.. So Israel has sensed that it is indeed going to happen. I feel the day is near when our brother Iran will develop power that will bring peace in the world and world will be more safer place than it is now. War was very much a possibility when balance of power between India and Pakistan was unequal.. and when Iran would develop Nuclear arsenal, it is ultimately going to bring peace to the this part of the world.


what happens if theres one misadventure or a miscommunication...


It would be peace sitting on the verge of near total annihilation.. ??? :what:
 
. .
i think it is very unlikely israel will accept a nuclear iran as that is inconsistent with its foreign policy of the last 30 years, which is predicated on military superiority.

if a country like iran, which is already fighting israel through hamas and hezbollah, develops nuclear weapons...the middle east is dead.

a confrontation is inevitable, and the arab states will go nuclear as they have hinted over time.

it seems the smartest thing to do is chance a military confrontation, hopefully with the complicity of the USA and silent support of the arabs.

at least delay the program, then finish Iran off with crippling sanctions.
 
.
at least delay the program, then finish Iran off with crippling sanctions.

What makes you think that Iran would not retalliate,What if Iran has Nukes and retaliates by leveling the Arab Oil Drilling setup and Israeli cities .Such a scenarios will be catastrophic.
NoOnes gona support Israel in this.Not even US as it will lose a vital OIL corridor in a possible Iranian retaliation with nukes.The Global Economy will have a huge setback.
 
.
better to migrate and settle in US and Europe.

A very good suggestion for the Israelis! Americans can have a great opportunity to prove their endless love and generosity towards the Israelis by letting them have a new homeland inside the US. The state of New York could be the best possible spot.
 
.
better to migrate and settle in US and Europe.

A very good suggestion for the Israelis! Americans can have a great opportunity to prove their endless love and generosity towards the Israelis by letting them have a new homeland inside the US. The state of New York could be the best possible spot.For the Americans it should not be a big deal, after all, the land did not belong to them anyway so it should not hurt their feelings to give away part of the stolen land.
 
.
i think it is very unlikely israel will accept a nuclear iran as that is inconsistent with its foreign policy of the last 30 years, which is predicated on military superiority.

if a country like iran, which is already fighting israel through hamas and hezbollah, develops nuclear weapons...the middle east is dead.

a confrontation is inevitable, and the arab states will go nuclear as they have hinted over time.

it seems the smartest thing to do is chance a military confrontation, hopefully with the complicity of the USA and silent support of the arabs.

at least delay the program, then finish Iran off with crippling sanctions.

The days of double standard to ensure Israel's military superiority are about to end and playing the song "Arab states will go nuclear" won't change anything.The west should have thought of the consequence of allowing Israel to develop nukes!
 
. .
A very good suggestion for the Israelis! Americans can have a great opportunity to prove their endless love and generosity towards the Israelis by letting them have a new homeland inside the US. The state of New York could be the best possible spot.For the Americans it should not be a big deal, after all, the land did not belong to them anyway so it should not hurt their feelings to give away part of the stolen land.

i guess getting raped by pakistan didn't change much?

there is a reason why bangladesh is one of the poorest countries on the planet...compared to israel, which has one of the most competitive economies in the industrialized war.

maybe take a few lessons from israel instead of whining about it? improve your quality of life.
 
.
i guess getting raped by pakistan didn't change much?

there is a reason why bangladesh is one of the poorest countries on the planet...compared to israel, which has one of the most competitive economies in the industrialized war.

maybe take a few lessons from israel instead of whining about it? improve your quality of life.


:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
What makes you think that Iran would not retalliate,What if Iran has Nukes and retaliates by leveling the Arab Oil Drilling setup and Israeli cities .Such a scenarios will be catastrophic.
NoOnes gona support Israel in this.Not even US as it will lose a vital OIL corridor in a possible Iranian retaliation with nukes.The Global Economy will have a huge setback.

if Iran levels oil drills in Arab areas then Israelis aren't the only one they'll have to worry about , the arabs will be screaming bloody murder and half the world(that uses oil) will be breathing down their backs. but of course no one wants this but if push comes to shove i believe Israel will risk it rather than face a nuclear Iran.
 
.
i guess getting raped by pakistan didn't change much?

there is a reason why bangladesh is one of the poorest countries on the planet...compared to israel, which has one of the most competitive economies in the industrialized war.

maybe take a few lessons from israel instead of whining about it? improve your quality of life.


Empty vessel sounds much; a lot of words but all irrelevent. Americans can have a great opportunity to prove their endless love and generosity towards the Israelis by letting them have a new homeland inside the US. The state of New York could be the best possible spot.For the Americans it should not be a big deal, after all, the land did not belong to them anyway so it should not hurt their feelings to give away part of the stolen land. I figure the moron has no reply to this! BTW did the Jews learn much after being raped by the Nazis? I don't think so.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom