What's new

"Isolating the wrong bug" How India tried — and failed — to isolate Pakistan in 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are one desperate guy:
zblACix.jpg

You do have more than 1 father.

1 Clegane
2 Asif Mangi
3 Monkey with BJP flag
4 .....
5 ......

You even wished your father(s) on fathers day on Facebook. :rofl:

4-29.jpg


:lol:
 
.
.
This is the reality of the T90. The 650 number is incorrect

Age Exclusive: How India lost 6 years on T-90 tanks
THE ASIAN AGE. | SANJIB KR BARUAH Published : Dec 11, 2016, 12:56 am IST Updated : Dec 11, 2016, 3:31 am IST

The poor rate of production and delivery has forced the Army and the defence ministry to rely on import of T-90 tanks from Russia.
Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar (Photo: PTI)
New Delhi: In a telling commentary on the state of affairs in India’s defence manufacturing, a defence ministry internal report has pointed out that the production of the Russian origin T-90 tanks, a mainstay of the country’s Armoured Corps, was delayed by six years on account of inability to translate documents from Russian to English.

This is one of the several systemic failings to indigenously manufacture the T-90 tanks listed in a 55-page internal report of the defence ministry prepared in May 2016 and now with the minister.

Shocking and bordering on the absurd is the finding that while India started receiving the documents from Russia in installments 2001 onwards, the translation could be completed only in 2007, a staggering six-year-long delay in absorbing transfer of technology (TOT) by India’s Heavy Vehicle Factory (HVF) in Avadi, Tamil Nadu, and the ordnance factory boards (OFB), commissioned to roll out the tanks.

The report says: “The documents were in Russian and OFB efforts to get these documents translated into English failed. These documents were received between September 2001 and January 2003 following which HVF Avadi concluded four contracts between September 2003 and September 2006 for translation of these documents. The documents were completed by July 2007 after the expiry of scheduled delivery period of the first phase of 15 indigenous tanks by 2006-07. Thus translation of TOT documents from Russian to English language took almost six years.”

The report also states that though ordered to manufacture 945 T-90 tanks for the Indian Army, HVF/OFBs could churn out only 227 tanks by 2014-15 — less than 25 per cent of the target in 13 years. This despite the fact that the OFB failed substantially to indigenise and even now 70 per cent of the material (by value) is being imported. Indigenous production of T-90 tanks was to start in 2003-04.

“Due to serious slippages in production and delivery targets, HVF has been able to deliver only 227 tanks as against 945 tanks ordered by the Army and against their own cumulative capacity of 1,300 tanks (from 2003 to 2016) …As such HVF has been able to utilise only 25 per cent of their production capacity in the last 13 years,” the report says.

The poor rate of production and delivery has forced the Army and the defence ministry to rely on import of T-90 tanks from Russia. While the cost of an imported T-90 tank works out to Rs 14 crore apiece, the average cost of production and supply of a T-90 within India is at least Rs 21 crore, the report adds.

On November 7, the defence ministry had okayed the purchase of 464 T-90 tanks at a cost of Rs 13,448 crore under the “Buy Indian” basis from the HVF/OFBs. All tanks are produced at HVF, a dedicated departmental undertaking.

Defence minister Manohar Parrikar is understood to have asked state-owned PSUs to put their act together. At an event a few months ago, Mr Parrikar had slammed the work culture at PSUs and had asked them to step out of the “cocoon of comfort”.

The report also points out that TOT documents in respect of some critical assemblies were not transferred by the original manufacturers even after a lapse of 12 years, that is till July 2013. An important component was the T-90 gun system for which the design was not received till May 2014.

India has a mix of T-72, T-90 and Arjun tanks. After nearly three decades of relying on Russia-made T-72 tanks, 2000 onwards the government decided to gradually substitute T-72 tanks with the next generation T-90 in the Army’s tank regiments, as the DRDO-made main battle tank (MBT) Arjun was only reluctantly and partially accepted by the Army. T-90 continues to be the mainstay.

The government’s overall objective has been to import a few number of tanks and produce the bulk balance within the country through the dedicated PSUs


Its why they were forced to order from Russia


Arjun turned out to be a lemon and they have inducted only in nominal numbers

Indian made weapons are awfull they have faults and the workmanship is poor hence the above report
 
. . .
.
Even after taking into account informal economy Pakistan GDP per capita is still lower than India.
With Informal economy; GDP PCI of India $2106; and that of Pakistan $1991.

While I am no racist but this time I would like to mention that just go to any white supremacist web site like Stormfront and Ask them in case of India vs Pakistan who they would prefer the vast majority would say India as they view Indians as relatively superior to Pakistanis.
/pol/ would say the same thing too.

One can say that Pakistanis are racially inferior as it has a lower HDI index, 15-16 times less Forex reserves, lower literacy, higher child and infant mortality and even higher Life expectancy.

Another proof of Indian racial superiority an be that Indians are viewed more positively than Pakistanis Among global populations.
country-rating-poll.pdf



http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/epaper/2014-03/28/content_17385423.htm
:rofl::lol:


Who cares what the folk at stormfront.org think? Must of them are just crying and ranting as to why they can't get a date with a white girl and why so many of have have black partners/boyfriends......lol

When you talk of racial superiority it usually means how good looking the race is. Having most of your race look like malnourished deformed ETs who have more ugly features than apes and stink worst than faeces is not a pretext for a "superior race".

Out of all the races of men, indian men are the least "men" of all races. It is a proven scientific fact and explains the deep hatred indians have of Pakistanis:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6161691.stm

http://metro.co.uk/2015/02/28/want-...has-the-biggest-penises-in-the-world-5083922/

Also, indians cannot claim superiority over anyone ever. Especially since the indian race has between 30-40% of the ENTIRE Earth's most severely malnourished and extreme poor:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-third-of-worlds-poorest-says-World-Bank.html

http://m.timesofindia.com/india/India-has-40-of-worlds-malnourished-Expert/articleshow/20840897.cms

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-29/india's-battle-with-malnutrition/7056274

http://m.timesofindia.com/india/53-...-on-World-Toilet-Day/articleshow/26032829.cms

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...591/India-accused-of-poverty-smokescreen.html

And images of "superior" india (PS: Viewer discretion advised):

https://www.chinasmack.com/filthy-india-photos-chinese-netizen-reactions

The above is evidence of a sub-human species and not a "superior race" contrary to retarded indian delusional bollywood fantasies :azn:
 
. .
Here is another of your post on FB. You only achievement in life. :D

obama-giving-medal.jpg


:lol:




Aa gayi bhai. Tamil Nadu ki cheerleader bhi aa gayi.

Don't worry he would turn pink soon anyways. Let us play with him ill then.

:lol:

You've got to admit, despite being an ugly Bharati, @Gregor Clegane is a very accomplished individual.
424x1d9.jpg


:sarcastic:
 
.
I also found your picture.

comedy-posts-for-facebook.jpg



:rofl:


WHAT IS THAT????????....YUK!!!!!:confused:.....Is there a competition going on somewhere in the world as to who can produce the most hideous, ugliest and deformed creatures on planet earth?
 
.
Even after taking into account informal economy Pakistan GDP per capita is still lower than India.
With Informal economy; GDP PCI of India $2106; and that of Pakistan $1991.
Please show me how you worked this out.

While I am no racist but this time I would like to mention that just go to any white supremacist web site like Stormfront and Ask them in case of India vs Pakistan who they would prefer the vast majority would say India as they view Indians as relatively superior to Pakistanis.
Yeh. That same ignorant bunch place the Jews at bottom of the pile so I guess we are in good company. The Stormfront thing is just feeding on post millenial Muslim thing that has taken off post 9/11.

They only see India of Bollywood. We know the real India of Dalits, Aboriginals, Adivasis, Untouchables and other junglees carrying the superiority gene from the Austrolid pool in India.
 
.
Who cares what the folk at stormfront.org think? Must of them are just crying and ranting as to why they can't get a date with a white girl and why so many of have have black partners/boyfriends......lol

When you talk of racial superiority it usually means how good looking the race is. Having most of your race look like malnourished deformed ETs who have more ugly features than apes and stink worst than faeces is not a pretext for a "superior race".

Out of all the races of men, indian men are the least "men" of all races. It is a proven scientific fact and explains the deep hatred indians have of Pakistanis:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6161691.stm

http://metro.co.uk/2015/02/28/want-...has-the-biggest-penises-in-the-world-5083922/

Also, indians cannot claim superiority over anyone ever. Especially since the indian race has between 30-40% of the ENTIRE Earth's most severely malnourished and extreme poor:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-third-of-worlds-poorest-says-World-Bank.html

http://m.timesofindia.com/india/India-has-40-of-worlds-malnourished-Expert/articleshow/20840897.cms

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-29/india's-battle-with-malnutrition/7056274

http://m.timesofindia.com/india/53-...-on-World-Toilet-Day/articleshow/26032829.cms

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...591/India-accused-of-poverty-smokescreen.html

And images of "superior" india (PS: Viewer discretion advised):

https://www.chinasmack.com/filthy-india-photos-chinese-netizen-reactions

The above is evidence of a sub-human species and not a "superior race" contrary to retarded indian delusional bollywood fantasies :azn:
Pakistanis are so insecure that they did not allow any survey to measure their manhoods.

India has better HDI, econ growth, infant mortality maternal mortality life expectancy and literacy, by yiur logic one can interpret that Indian are a far superior race and have better genetics than Pakistani.

Also physical superiority of Indians can be prived by the fact that in past 6 Olympics India won 14 medals whereas Pakistan won none.
 
Last edited:
.
You've got to admit, despite being an ugly Bharati, @Gregor Clegane is a very accomplished individual.
424x1d9.jpg


:sarcastic:

True. @Gregor Clegane can surely apply for this job too.

66e88cd3f97e49d41f8ce38fc6068253.jpg


After all he would be pink soon. He needs a job desperately. :D

WHAT IS THAT????????....YUK!!!!!:confused:.....Is there a competition going on somewhere in the world as to who can produce the most hideous, ugliest and deformed creatures on planet earth?

May be. @Gregor Clegane has already won that competition. He is a 5 times undefeated champion. :)
 
.
In between April 2015-December 2016 India churned out another 220 T-90s.T-90 production rate is now 140/year:
http://tenders.gov.in/innerpage.asp?choice=tc5&tid=tamil704092&work=1
in addition in the past six years 124 Arjuns were produced.

Whereas Pakistan managed to produce only 2 AK in 2014-15 as per modp report.

HIT produces AK only when Army orders them. The previous contract was completed. The two you are referring to are prototypes of AK1 which are now in production. It is stupid to have a large fleet of the same vintage. Production should be in upgraded batches.

Off course i forgot about the 124 Arjuns which are almost all non-operational because of Technical and spare issues. Great work and serving Pakistan very well.
 
.
Pakistanis are so insecure that they did not allow any survey to measure their manhoods.

Yeah, Indians are definitely manlier than us with 2-inch members.
Condoms 'too big' for Indian men

The conclusion of all this scientific endeavour is that about 60% of Indian men have penises which are between three and five centimetres shorter than international standards used in condom manufacture.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom